Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend regimen for diabetic macular oedema: the RETAIN study

C. Prünte, F. Fajnkuchen, S. Mahmood, F. Ricci, K. Hatz, J. Studnička, V. Bezlyak, S. Parikh, WJ. Stubbings, A. Wenzel, J. Figueira, . ,

. 2016 ; 100 (6) : 787-95. [pub] 20151009

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17024223
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1922-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1922-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci

AIMS: To demonstrate non-inferiority of ranibizumab treat-and-extend (T&E) with/without laser to ranibizumab pro re nata (PRN) for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: A 24-month single-masked study with patients randomised 1:1:1 to T&E+laser (n=121), T&E (n=128) or PRN (control; n=123). All patients received monthly injections until BCVA stabilisation. The investigator decided on re-treatment in the PRN and treatment-interval adaptations in the T&E groups based on loss of BCVA stability due to DMO activity. Likewise, laser treatment was at investigator's discretion. Collectively, these features reflect a real-life scenario. Endpoints included mean average change in BCVA from baseline to months 1-12 (primary), mean BCVA change from baseline to months 12 and 24, treatment exposure and safety profile. RESULTS: Both T&E regimens were non-inferior to PRN based on mean average BCVA change from baseline to months 1-12 (T&E+laser: +5.9 and T&E: +6.1 vs PRN: +6.2 letters; both p<0.0001). Mean BCVA change at month 24 was similar across groups (+8.3, +6.5 and +8.1 letters, respectively). The mean number of injections was 12.4 and 12.8 in the T&E+laser and T&E groups and 10.7 in the PRN group. The T&E regimens showed 46% reduction in the number of clinic visits. Over 70% of patients maintained their BCVA, with treatment intervals of ≥2 months over 24 months. Safety profile was consistent with that described in the product information. CONCLUSIONS: T&E is a feasible treatment option for patients with DMO, with a potential to reduce treatment burden. Slightly more injections were required versus PRN, likely due to the specifics of the T&E regimen applied here. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01171976.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17024223
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170831103606.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307249 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26453639
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Prünte, Christian $u Department of Ophthalmology, Vista Klinik, Binningen, Switzerland Kantonsspital Baselland, Eye Clinic, Liestal, Switzerland University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
245    10
$a Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend regimen for diabetic macular oedema: the RETAIN study / $c C. Prünte, F. Fajnkuchen, S. Mahmood, F. Ricci, K. Hatz, J. Studnička, V. Bezlyak, S. Parikh, WJ. Stubbings, A. Wenzel, J. Figueira, . ,
520    9_
$a AIMS: To demonstrate non-inferiority of ranibizumab treat-and-extend (T&E) with/without laser to ranibizumab pro re nata (PRN) for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: A 24-month single-masked study with patients randomised 1:1:1 to T&E+laser (n=121), T&E (n=128) or PRN (control; n=123). All patients received monthly injections until BCVA stabilisation. The investigator decided on re-treatment in the PRN and treatment-interval adaptations in the T&E groups based on loss of BCVA stability due to DMO activity. Likewise, laser treatment was at investigator's discretion. Collectively, these features reflect a real-life scenario. Endpoints included mean average change in BCVA from baseline to months 1-12 (primary), mean BCVA change from baseline to months 12 and 24, treatment exposure and safety profile. RESULTS: Both T&E regimens were non-inferior to PRN based on mean average BCVA change from baseline to months 1-12 (T&E+laser: +5.9 and T&E: +6.1 vs PRN: +6.2 letters; both p<0.0001). Mean BCVA change at month 24 was similar across groups (+8.3, +6.5 and +8.1 letters, respectively). The mean number of injections was 12.4 and 12.8 in the T&E+laser and T&E groups and 10.7 in the PRN group. The T&E regimens showed 46% reduction in the number of clinic visits. Over 70% of patients maintained their BCVA, with treatment intervals of ≥2 months over 24 months. Safety profile was consistent with that described in the product information. CONCLUSIONS: T&E is a feasible treatment option for patients with DMO, with a potential to reduce treatment burden. Slightly more injections were required versus PRN, likely due to the specifics of the T&E regimen applied here. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01171976.
650    _2
$a inhibitory angiogeneze $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D020533
650    _2
$a diabetická retinopatie $x komplikace $x diagnóza $7 D003930
650    _2
$a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a injekce intravitreální $7 D058449
650    _2
$a macula lutea $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008266
650    _2
$a makulární edém $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $x etiologie $7 D008269
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a ranibizumab $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000069579
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a optická koherentní tomografie $7 D041623
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A $x antagonisté a inhibitory $7 D042461
650    12
$a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Fajnkuchen, Franck $u Centre d'Imagerie et Laser, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Mahmood, Sajjad $u Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
700    1_
$a Ricci, Federico $u PTV Foundation, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
700    1_
$a Hatz, Katja $u Department of Ophthalmology, Vista Klinik, Binningen, Switzerland University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Studnička, Jan $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bezlyak, Vladimir $u Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Parikh, Soumil $u Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Stubbings, William John $u Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Wenzel, Andreas $u Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Figueira, João $u AIBILI, Coimbra, Portugal Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
700    1_
$a ,
773    0_
$w MED00000875 $t The British journal of ophthalmology $x 1468-2079 $g Roč. 100, č. 6 (2016), s. 787-95
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26453639 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170831104156 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239904 $s 985136
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 100 $c 6 $d 787-95 $e 20151009 $i 1468-2079 $m British journal of ophthalmology $n Br J Ophthalmol $x MED00000875
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...