• Something wrong with this record ?

Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a double-blind, randomized, single-center trial

P. Falt, V. Šmajstrla, P. Fojtík, M. Hill, O. Urban,

. 2017 ; 29 (3) : 355-359.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: Bowel distension by insufflated air causes abdominal discomfort after colonoscopy. Carbon dioxide (CO2) instead of air insufflation during colonoscopy can reduce postprocedural discomfort in diagnostic and screening cases. Discomfort after colonoscopy and CO2 insufflation have never been studied in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, characterized by younger age, structural changes of the colon, and need for repeated and frequently uncomfortable colonoscopies. Our trial was designed to evaluate postprocedural discomfort associated with CO2 compared with air insufflation in unsedated or minimally sedated patients with known IBD. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, single-center study, 64 patients were randomized to either CO2 insufflation (CO2) or air insufflation colonoscopy (Air). Abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence scores during 24 h after colonoscopy were recorded using a continuous scale of 0-10 (0=none, 10=maximum discomfort). The primary endpoint used for power calculation was bloating score at 1 h after colonoscopy. RESULTS: Pain, bloating, and flatulence scores at end, 1, and 3 h after colonoscopy were significantly lower in CO2 than in Air arm (P<0.001). Scores at 6, 12, and 24 h were comparable. Procedural parameters such as cecal and terminal ileum intubation rate, intubation and total time, pain during insertion, need for repositioning, and abdominal compression were not different between arms. No complications were recorded in the study. CONCLUSION: Compared with air, CO2 insufflation significantly reduces abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence scores during at least 3 h after colonoscopy in IBD patients, achieving comparable intraprocedural outcomes.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031293
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171030121627.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000791 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27845950
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Falt, Přemysl $u aDigestive Diseases Center, Vítkovice Hospital bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava cInstitute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a double-blind, randomized, single-center trial / $c P. Falt, V. Šmajstrla, P. Fojtík, M. Hill, O. Urban,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Bowel distension by insufflated air causes abdominal discomfort after colonoscopy. Carbon dioxide (CO2) instead of air insufflation during colonoscopy can reduce postprocedural discomfort in diagnostic and screening cases. Discomfort after colonoscopy and CO2 insufflation have never been studied in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, characterized by younger age, structural changes of the colon, and need for repeated and frequently uncomfortable colonoscopies. Our trial was designed to evaluate postprocedural discomfort associated with CO2 compared with air insufflation in unsedated or minimally sedated patients with known IBD. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, single-center study, 64 patients were randomized to either CO2 insufflation (CO2) or air insufflation colonoscopy (Air). Abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence scores during 24 h after colonoscopy were recorded using a continuous scale of 0-10 (0=none, 10=maximum discomfort). The primary endpoint used for power calculation was bloating score at 1 h after colonoscopy. RESULTS: Pain, bloating, and flatulence scores at end, 1, and 3 h after colonoscopy were significantly lower in CO2 than in Air arm (P<0.001). Scores at 6, 12, and 24 h were comparable. Procedural parameters such as cecal and terminal ileum intubation rate, intubation and total time, pain during insertion, need for repositioning, and abdominal compression were not different between arms. No complications were recorded in the study. CONCLUSION: Compared with air, CO2 insufflation significantly reduces abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence scores during at least 3 h after colonoscopy in IBD patients, achieving comparable intraprocedural outcomes.
650    _2
$a bolesti břicha $x etiologie $7 D015746
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a oxid uhličitý $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D002245
650    _2
$a ulcerózní kolitida $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D003093
650    _2
$a kolon $x patologie $7 D003106
650    _2
$a kolonoskopie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D003113
650    _2
$a Crohnova nemoc $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D003424
650    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a flatulence $x etiologie $7 D005414
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypnotika a sedativa $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D006993
650    _2
$a insuflace $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D007327
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Šmajstrla, Vít
700    1_
$a Fojtík, Petr
700    1_
$a Hill, Martin
700    1_
$a Urban, Ondřej
773    0_
$w MED00001618 $t European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology $x 1473-5687 $g Roč. 29, č. 3 (2017), s. 355-359
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27845950 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171030121716 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254886 $s 992320
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 29 $c 3 $d 355-359 $i 1473-5687 $m European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology $n Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol $x MED00001618
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...