• Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of GreenLight laser and transurethral resection of the prostate baseline characteristics and outcomes: lessons learned from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society GreenLight Laser Study

G. Muir, J. Klecka, DJ. Culkin, GH. Barusso, J. Kums, C. Brunken, G. Eure, C. Rioja Sanz, F. Gomez Sancha, MM. Yildiz, JJ. de la Rosette, . ,

. 2017 ; 69 (3) : 285-292. [pub] 20161005

Language English Country Italy

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Observational Study

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18017008

BACKGROUND: To compare baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing GreenLight laser vaporization (GL) or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a real life setting. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort, the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) collected data of consecutive GL or TURP treated patients. Treatment involved one of three GL laser powers (80 W, 120 W or 180 W) based on availability in each participating centre, or TURP. Data on baseline characteristics as well as functional measures were collected at three time points: 6-12 weeks, 6, and 12months after surgery. Functional measures included urinary flow parameters, perceived prostate function (IPSS), perceived erectile function (IIEF-5) and complications. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirteen patients underwent GL, and 234 patients underwent TURP. Overall, patients treated with GL show higher BMI, IIEF and medication use, together with lower urinary function (voided volume, incontinence, urinary retention) at baseline. After the procedure, despite higher antibiotic and antimuscarinic use and shorter hospital stay, readmission rates, PVR, PSA were higher, but Qmax, and IIEF were lower in the GL group. The rate of post-operative complications was 10.3% and 5.2% for the TURP and GL group, respectively (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to categorically state which procedure is superior. This observational study confirms that treatment decision for either TURP or GL is not based on patient characteristics.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18017008
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180521103128.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02721-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27706124
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Muir, Gordon $u Department of Urology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
245    10
$a Comparison of GreenLight laser and transurethral resection of the prostate baseline characteristics and outcomes: lessons learned from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society GreenLight Laser Study / $c G. Muir, J. Klecka, DJ. Culkin, GH. Barusso, J. Kums, C. Brunken, G. Eure, C. Rioja Sanz, F. Gomez Sancha, MM. Yildiz, JJ. de la Rosette, . ,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: To compare baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing GreenLight laser vaporization (GL) or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a real life setting. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort, the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) collected data of consecutive GL or TURP treated patients. Treatment involved one of three GL laser powers (80 W, 120 W or 180 W) based on availability in each participating centre, or TURP. Data on baseline characteristics as well as functional measures were collected at three time points: 6-12 weeks, 6, and 12months after surgery. Functional measures included urinary flow parameters, perceived prostate function (IPSS), perceived erectile function (IIEF-5) and complications. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirteen patients underwent GL, and 234 patients underwent TURP. Overall, patients treated with GL show higher BMI, IIEF and medication use, together with lower urinary function (voided volume, incontinence, urinary retention) at baseline. After the procedure, despite higher antibiotic and antimuscarinic use and shorter hospital stay, readmission rates, PVR, PSA were higher, but Qmax, and IIEF were lower in the GL group. The rate of post-operative complications was 10.3% and 5.2% for the TURP and GL group, respectively (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to categorically state which procedure is superior. This observational study confirms that treatment decision for either TURP or GL is not based on patient characteristics.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laserová terapie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D053685
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a hyperplazie prostaty $x chirurgie $7 D011470
650    _2
$a transuretrální resekce prostaty $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D020728
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a inkontinence moči $x etiologie $7 D014549
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Klecka, Jiri $u Department of Urology, Faculty and Teaching Hospital, Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Culkin, Daniel J $u Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, OK, USA.
700    1_
$a Barusso, Gabriel H $u Department of Urology, Center of Urology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
700    1_
$a Kums, Jan $u Department of Urology, Isala Clinic, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Brunken, Claus $u Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Eure, Gregg $u Department of Urology, Urology of Virginia, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Virginia Beach, VA, USA.
700    1_
$a Rioja Sanz, Carlos $u Department of Urology, Hospital General Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain.
700    1_
$a Gomez Sancha, Fernando $u Department of Urology, Advanced Urologic Surgery Institute, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Yildiz, Muharrem M $u Department of Urology, Private Lokman Hekim Hospitals, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.
700    1_
$a de la Rosette, Jean J $u Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands - J.J.delaRosette@amc.uva.nl.
700    1_
$a ,
773    0_
$w MED00003372 $t Minerva urologica e nefrologica The Italian journal of urology and nephrology $x 1827-1758 $g Roč. 69, č. 3 (2017), s. 285-292
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27706124 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180521103309 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300632 $s 1013848
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 69 $c 3 $d 285-292 $e 20161005 $i 1827-1758 $m Minerva urologica e nefrologica $n Minerva Urol Nefrol $x MED00003372
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options