-
Something wrong with this record ?
Benzathine penicillin G once-every-3-week prophylaxis for recurrent erysipelas a retrospective study of 132 patients
F. Rob, J. Hercogová,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Patient Compliance MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Penicillin G Benzathine therapeutic use MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Erysipelas complications drug therapy epidemiology MeSH
- Incidence MeSH
- Injections, Intramuscular MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Obesity complications MeSH
- Odds Ratio MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Drug Administration Schedule MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectivity, safety and patients' adherence to benzathine penicillin G (BPG) 1,200,000 units (1.2 MU) once-every-3-week intramuscularly prophylaxis for recurrent erysipelas. METHODS: Patients with documented two or more erysipelas episodes in last two years who received at least one of 10 planned doses of BPG 1.2 MU intramuscularly between January 2009 and December 2015 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Number of recurrences during the 30-week prophylaxis and in the 30-week follow-up period, frequency of adverse events, patients' adherence to the treatment and factors associated with the recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: From 132 patients, 109 (82.6%) finished the 30-week prophylactic regimen successfully. The incidence of erysipelas was 8 per 100 patient-years during the prophylactic period and 28 per 100 patient-years in the follow-up period (incidence rate ratio = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05-0.34; p < .01). In univariate analysis recurrence was significantly associated only with presence of any local risk factor concurrently with obesity (OR 3.40; 95% CI: 1.10-10.50; p < .05). CONCLUSION: Benzathine penicillin G 1.2 MU once every 3 weeks is an effective and well-tolerated prophylaxis of recurrent erysipelas with good patient adherence to the treatment. Further studies to determine the appropriate duration of prophylaxis are necessary.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18025035
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180718111232.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/09546634.2017.1329507 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28489486
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Rob, Filip $u a Dermatovenereology Department , Na Bulovce Hospital, 2nd Medical Faculty Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Benzathine penicillin G once-every-3-week prophylaxis for recurrent erysipelas a retrospective study of 132 patients / $c F. Rob, J. Hercogová,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectivity, safety and patients' adherence to benzathine penicillin G (BPG) 1,200,000 units (1.2 MU) once-every-3-week intramuscularly prophylaxis for recurrent erysipelas. METHODS: Patients with documented two or more erysipelas episodes in last two years who received at least one of 10 planned doses of BPG 1.2 MU intramuscularly between January 2009 and December 2015 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Number of recurrences during the 30-week prophylaxis and in the 30-week follow-up period, frequency of adverse events, patients' adherence to the treatment and factors associated with the recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: From 132 patients, 109 (82.6%) finished the 30-week prophylactic regimen successfully. The incidence of erysipelas was 8 per 100 patient-years during the prophylactic period and 28 per 100 patient-years in the follow-up period (incidence rate ratio = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05-0.34; p < .01). In univariate analysis recurrence was significantly associated only with presence of any local risk factor concurrently with obesity (OR 3.40; 95% CI: 1.10-10.50; p < .05). CONCLUSION: Benzathine penicillin G 1.2 MU once every 3 weeks is an effective and well-tolerated prophylaxis of recurrent erysipelas with good patient adherence to the treatment. Further studies to determine the appropriate duration of prophylaxis are necessary.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000900
- 650 _2
- $a rozvrh dávkování léků $7 D004334
- 650 _2
- $a erysipel $x komplikace $x farmakoterapie $x epidemiologie $7 D004886
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a incidence $7 D015994
- 650 _2
- $a injekce intramuskulární $7 D007273
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a obezita $x komplikace $7 D009765
- 650 _2
- $a odds ratio $7 D016017
- 650 _2
- $a adherence pacienta $7 D010349
- 650 _2
- $a benzathin-penicilin G $x terapeutické užití $7 D010401
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hercogová, Jana $u a Dermatovenereology Department , Na Bulovce Hospital, 2nd Medical Faculty Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004913 $t The Journal of dermatological treatment $x 1471-1753 $g Roč. 29, č. 1 (2018), s. 39-43
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28489486 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180718111532 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317166 $s 1021956
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 29 $c 1 $d 39-43 $e 20170530 $i 1471-1753 $m Journal of dermatological treatment $n J Dermatolog Treat $x MED00004913
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709