• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Severity of drug resistance and co-existence of Enterococcus faecalis in diabetic foot ulcer infections

K. Shettigar, DV. Bhat, K. Satyamoorthy, TS. Murali,

. 2018 ; 63 (1) : 115-122. [pub] 20170909

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18026871

The genes encoding aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus faecalis may promote collateral aminoglycoside resistance in polymicrobial wounds. We studied a total of 100 diabetic foot ulcer samples for infection and found 60 samples to be polymicrobial, 5 to be monomicrobial, and 35 samples to be culture negative. A total of 65 E. faecalis isolates were screened for six genes coding for aminoglycoside resistance, antibiotic resistance patterns, and biofilm production. Infectious Diseases Society of America/International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot system was used to classify the wound ulcers. Majority of the subjects with culture-positive wound were recommended conservative management, while 14 subjects underwent amputation. Enterococcal isolates showed higher resistance for erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin. Isolates from grade 3 ulcer showed higher frequency of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia, while all the isolates were negative for aph(2″)-Ib, aph(2″)-Ic, and aph(2″)-Id. The isolates from grade 3 ulcers showed higher resistance to aminoglycosides as well as teicoplanin and chloramphenicol. All the 39 biofilm producers were obtained from polymicrobial wound and showed higher resistance when compared to biofilm non-producers. Higher frequency of isolates carrying aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia in polymicrobial community showing resistance to key antibiotics suggests widespread distribution of aminoglycoside-resistant E. faecalis and their role in worsening diabetic foot ulcers.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18026871
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180730110102.0
007      
ta
008      
180730s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-017-0547-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28889401
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Shettigar, Kavitha $u Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, India.
245    10
$a Severity of drug resistance and co-existence of Enterococcus faecalis in diabetic foot ulcer infections / $c K. Shettigar, DV. Bhat, K. Satyamoorthy, TS. Murali,
520    9_
$a The genes encoding aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus faecalis may promote collateral aminoglycoside resistance in polymicrobial wounds. We studied a total of 100 diabetic foot ulcer samples for infection and found 60 samples to be polymicrobial, 5 to be monomicrobial, and 35 samples to be culture negative. A total of 65 E. faecalis isolates were screened for six genes coding for aminoglycoside resistance, antibiotic resistance patterns, and biofilm production. Infectious Diseases Society of America/International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot system was used to classify the wound ulcers. Majority of the subjects with culture-positive wound were recommended conservative management, while 14 subjects underwent amputation. Enterococcal isolates showed higher resistance for erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin. Isolates from grade 3 ulcer showed higher frequency of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia, while all the isolates were negative for aph(2″)-Ib, aph(2″)-Ic, and aph(2″)-Id. The isolates from grade 3 ulcers showed higher resistance to aminoglycosides as well as teicoplanin and chloramphenicol. All the 39 biofilm producers were obtained from polymicrobial wound and showed higher resistance when compared to biofilm non-producers. Higher frequency of isolates carrying aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia in polymicrobial community showing resistance to key antibiotics suggests widespread distribution of aminoglycoside-resistant E. faecalis and their role in worsening diabetic foot ulcers.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a diabetická noha $x mikrobiologie $7 D017719
650    12
$a bakteriální léková rezistence $7 D024881
650    _2
$a Enterococcus faecalis $x klasifikace $x účinky léků $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D013293
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a grampozitivní bakteriální infekce $x mikrobiologie $7 D016908
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bhat, Deepika V $u Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, India.
700    1_
$a Satyamoorthy, Kapaettu $u Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, School of Life Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, India.
700    1_
$a Murali, Thokur Sreepathy $u Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, India. murali.ts@manipal.edu.
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 63, č. 1 (2018), s. 115-122
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28889401 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180730 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180730110413 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1322097 $s 1023802
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 63 $c 1 $d 115-122 $e 20170909 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180730

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace