Severity of drug resistance and co-existence of Enterococcus faecalis in diabetic foot ulcer infections
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28889401
DOI
10.1007/s12223-017-0547-2
PII: 10.1007/s12223-017-0547-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bakteriální léková rezistence * MeSH
- diabetická noha mikrobiologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- Enterococcus faecalis klasifikace účinky léků genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- grampozitivní bakteriální infekce mikrobiologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The genes encoding aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus faecalis may promote collateral aminoglycoside resistance in polymicrobial wounds. We studied a total of 100 diabetic foot ulcer samples for infection and found 60 samples to be polymicrobial, 5 to be monomicrobial, and 35 samples to be culture negative. A total of 65 E. faecalis isolates were screened for six genes coding for aminoglycoside resistance, antibiotic resistance patterns, and biofilm production. Infectious Diseases Society of America/International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot system was used to classify the wound ulcers. Majority of the subjects with culture-positive wound were recommended conservative management, while 14 subjects underwent amputation. Enterococcal isolates showed higher resistance for erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin. Isolates from grade 3 ulcer showed higher frequency of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia, while all the isolates were negative for aph(2″)-Ib, aph(2″)-Ic, and aph(2″)-Id. The isolates from grade 3 ulcers showed higher resistance to aminoglycosides as well as teicoplanin and chloramphenicol. All the 39 biofilm producers were obtained from polymicrobial wound and showed higher resistance when compared to biofilm non-producers. Higher frequency of isolates carrying aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia in polymicrobial community showing resistance to key antibiotics suggests widespread distribution of aminoglycoside-resistant E. faecalis and their role in worsening diabetic foot ulcers.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Feb;47(2):159-69 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1997 Oct;179(20):6355-9 PubMed
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Feb;28 Suppl 1:163-78 PubMed
Science. 2003 Mar 28;299(5615):2071-4 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Aug 25;103(2):191-8 PubMed
Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1727-32 PubMed
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Mar 16;10(4):266-78 PubMed
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Mar;62 Suppl 1:S1-27 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2014 Oct;63(Pt 10):1377-85 PubMed
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 17;5:13296 PubMed
Diabetes Care. 2012 Mar;35(3):617-23 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul;186(13):4085-99 PubMed
Nature. 2011 Aug 31;477(7365):457-61 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Apr;45(4):999-1007 PubMed
Science. 2003 Nov 28;302(5650):1569-71 PubMed
Front Biosci. 2002 Aug 01;7:d1825-42 PubMed
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;32(3):141-6 PubMed
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Feb;67(2):433-9 PubMed
Foot (Edinb). 2011 Mar;21(1):6-14 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Sep;19(9):E398-404 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 May;43(5):2291-302 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 2016 Aug 28;428(17 ):3355-71 PubMed
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Apr;25(4):1272-8 PubMed
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(6):764-70 PubMed
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):586-9 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1986 Aug;167(2):631-8 PubMed
J Endod. 2006 Aug;32(8):722-6 PubMed
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27317 PubMed
Nature. 2005 Aug 25;436(7054):1171-5 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Mar;41(3):1109-13 PubMed
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Sep;15(3):495-501 PubMed
Microb Pathog. 2010 Jan;48(1):18-27 PubMed
J Infect. 2006 May;52(5):383-6 PubMed
Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Feb;18(2):233-9 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 9;342(10):710-21 PubMed
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Mar;67(3):551-8 PubMed
