• Something wrong with this record ?

A feasibility study comparing pharmacist and physician recommendations for sildenafil treatment

T. Symonds, JD. Dean, A. Carr, M. Carlsson, A. Marfatia, G. Schnetzler,

. 2011 ; 8 (5) : 1463-1471. [pub] 20110216

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

INTRODUCTION: In Europe, pharmacists may be an important first point of contact for men with erectile dysfunction (ED) asking for advice and treatment. AIM: To determine if European community pharmacists could appropriately recommend suitability for supply of sildenafil 50 mg for the treatment of ED. METHODS: For this cross-sectional, observational study, the current Summary of Product Characteristics was adapted to create a study drug information sheet for use in a pharmacy setting in which, for certain patients, supply is not suitable and referral to a physician is recommended. After training and with use of a guidance questionnaire, pharmacists assessed the suitability of supply of sildenafil 50 mg for men presenting to their pharmacy. Men with self-reported ED who were not currently using a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor were recruited. Within 7 days of the pharmacist-patient interaction, a physician with experience in the management of ED telephoned the subject to assess suitability. If there was discordance between the pharmacist and physician recommendations, the case was independently reassessed by a physician specialist in sexual medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the concordance rate (with 95% confidence intervals) between pharmacist and physician recommendations. Rates were weighted by country sample sizes. RESULTS: Concordance (95% confidence interval) was 0.70 (0.66-0.74) between pharmacist and physician recommendation, indicating agreement in 70% of cases, and was 0.90 (0.86-0.94) between pharmacist and physician specialist in sexual medicine. Furthermore, if the cases in which the pharmacist did not put subjects at risk (i.e., gave an acceptable recommendation) are assessed, the success rate is 83.5% (79.6-87.4%) and 92.8% (90.1-95.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists were accurate in providing suitable treatment recommendation, generally not recommending sildenafil for men without ED and recommending physician assessment when there was any question about cardiovascular health, other comorbidity, or co-medication.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20014989
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200929120614.0
007      
ta
008      
200922s2011 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02212.x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21324090
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Symonds, Tara $u Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA. tara.symonds@pfizer.com
245    12
$a A feasibility study comparing pharmacist and physician recommendations for sildenafil treatment / $c T. Symonds, JD. Dean, A. Carr, M. Carlsson, A. Marfatia, G. Schnetzler,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: In Europe, pharmacists may be an important first point of contact for men with erectile dysfunction (ED) asking for advice and treatment. AIM: To determine if European community pharmacists could appropriately recommend suitability for supply of sildenafil 50 mg for the treatment of ED. METHODS: For this cross-sectional, observational study, the current Summary of Product Characteristics was adapted to create a study drug information sheet for use in a pharmacy setting in which, for certain patients, supply is not suitable and referral to a physician is recommended. After training and with use of a guidance questionnaire, pharmacists assessed the suitability of supply of sildenafil 50 mg for men presenting to their pharmacy. Men with self-reported ED who were not currently using a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor were recruited. Within 7 days of the pharmacist-patient interaction, a physician with experience in the management of ED telephoned the subject to assess suitability. If there was discordance between the pharmacist and physician recommendations, the case was independently reassessed by a physician specialist in sexual medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the concordance rate (with 95% confidence intervals) between pharmacist and physician recommendations. Rates were weighted by country sample sizes. RESULTS: Concordance (95% confidence interval) was 0.70 (0.66-0.74) between pharmacist and physician recommendation, indicating agreement in 70% of cases, and was 0.90 (0.86-0.94) between pharmacist and physician specialist in sexual medicine. Furthermore, if the cases in which the pharmacist did not put subjects at risk (i.e., gave an acceptable recommendation) are assessed, the success rate is 83.5% (79.6-87.4%) and 92.8% (90.1-95.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists were accurate in providing suitable treatment recommendation, generally not recommending sildenafil for men without ED and recommending physician assessment when there was any question about cardiovascular health, other comorbidity, or co-medication.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a klinické kompetence $7 D002983
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a erektilní dysfunkce $x farmakoterapie $7 D007172
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a farmaceuti $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010595
650    _2
$a inhibitory fosfodiesterasy 5 $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D058986
650    _2
$a piperaziny $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D010879
650    _2
$a lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010818
650    _2
$a odborná způsobilost $7 D011361
650    _2
$a puriny $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D011687
650    _2
$a sildenafil citrát $7 D000068677
650    _2
$a sulfony $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D013450
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Německo $7 D005858
651    _2
$a Španělsko $7 D013030
651    _2
$a Spojené království $7 D006113
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dean, John D
700    1_
$a Carr, Alison
700    1_
$a Carlsson, Martin
700    1_
$a Marfatia, Aditya
700    1_
$a Schnetzler, Gabriel
773    0_
$w MED00177480 $t The journal of sexual medicine $x 1743-6109 $g Roč. 8, č. 5 (2011), s. 1463-1471
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21324090 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200922 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200929120610 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1567838 $s 1105149
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 8 $c 5 $d 1463-1471 $e 20110216 $i 1743-6109 $m The journal of sexual medicine $n J Sex Med $x MED00177480
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200922

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...