Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Carpal tunnel syndrome aurgery anti-adhesion gel Is effective? [Chirurgické léčení syndromu karpálního tunelu – je antiadhezivní gel efektivní]

A. Bilge, R. G. Ulusoy, O. Ozturk, I. A. Ozturk, S. Aykut

. 2017 ; 84 (5) : 391-395.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky kontrolované, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18030356

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of the current study is to assess the efficacy of anti-adhesion gel on the symptom severity and functional outcomes after mini incision open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrom (CTS). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 200 CTS patients (154 women, 46 men) were included in this study. Group I (n = 100; 78 women, 22 men) did not receive local administration of anti-adhesion gel, while anti-adhesion gel consisting of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm®, SanofiBiosurgery, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) was locally applied to patients in Group II (n = 100; 76 women, 24 men). All patients recruited in this study had received conservative treatment comprised of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, steroid injection, replacement of vitamin B and stabilization with splints. Cases that did not benefit from these therapeutic options during one year were assigned as candidates for surgical treatment. RESULTS There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of mean age, gender distribution, preoperative and postoperative Boston questionnaire (BQ) scores, difference of BQ scores after the operation, and the presence of the disease on the left or right side. According to postoperative 1. Year results, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS Results of the current study demonstrated that use of anti-adhesion gel during mini incision open surgery for CTS did not bring about significant advantages in terms of functional or symptomatic outcomes. Further, controlled trials on larger series are warranted to understand the beneficial effects of anti-adhesive materials during the surgical treatment of CTS. Key words: anti-adhesion gel, Boston questionnaire, carpal tunnel syndrome.

Chirurgické léčení syndromu karpálního tunelu – je antiadhezivní gel efektivní

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18030356
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180920151450.0
007      
ta
008      
180904s2017 xr a f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2017/059 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29351542
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Bilge, A. $u Kafkas Univercity, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kars, Turkey
245    10
$a Carpal tunnel syndrome aurgery anti-adhesion gel Is effective? / $c A. Bilge, R. G. Ulusoy, O. Ozturk, I. A. Ozturk, S. Aykut
246    31
$a Chirurgické léčení syndromu karpálního tunelu – je antiadhezivní gel efektivní
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of the current study is to assess the efficacy of anti-adhesion gel on the symptom severity and functional outcomes after mini incision open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrom (CTS). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 200 CTS patients (154 women, 46 men) were included in this study. Group I (n = 100; 78 women, 22 men) did not receive local administration of anti-adhesion gel, while anti-adhesion gel consisting of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm®, SanofiBiosurgery, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) was locally applied to patients in Group II (n = 100; 76 women, 24 men). All patients recruited in this study had received conservative treatment comprised of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, steroid injection, replacement of vitamin B and stabilization with splints. Cases that did not benefit from these therapeutic options during one year were assigned as candidates for surgical treatment. RESULTS There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of mean age, gender distribution, preoperative and postoperative Boston questionnaire (BQ) scores, difference of BQ scores after the operation, and the presence of the disease on the left or right side. According to postoperative 1. Year results, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS Results of the current study demonstrated that use of anti-adhesion gel during mini incision open surgery for CTS did not bring about significant advantages in terms of functional or symptomatic outcomes. Further, controlled trials on larger series are warranted to understand the beneficial effects of anti-adhesive materials during the surgical treatment of CTS. Key words: anti-adhesion gel, Boston questionnaire, carpal tunnel syndrome.
650    _2
$a syndrom karpálního tunelu $x chirurgie $7 D002349
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a gely $7 D005782
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kyselina hyaluronová $x terapeutické užití $7 D006820
650    _2
$a peroperační péče $x metody $7 D007430
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
650    _2
$a adheze tkání $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D000267
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Ulusoy, R. G. $u Kafkas Univercity, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kars, Turkey
700    1_
$a Ozturk, O. $u Kafkas University, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Kars, Turkey
700    1_
$a Ozturk, I. A. $u Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Aykut, S. $u Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Istanbul, Turkey
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 84, č. 5 (2017), s. 391-395
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20180904 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180919143417 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1335291 $s 1027327
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 84 $c 5 $d 391-395 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20180904

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...