Background Stomach preparation by ischaemic conditioning prior to oesophageal resection represents a potential method of reducing the risk of anastomotic complications. This study compares the results of the anastomotic complications of cervical anastomosis after oesophagectomy with a short interval after ischaemic conditioning (group S) and a long interval (group L). Methods Subjects undergoing oesophagectomy for carcinoma after ischaemic conditioning were divided into two groups. Group S had a median interval between ischaemic conditioning and resection of 20 days, while for group L the median interval was 49 days. Anastomotic leak and anastomotic stenosis in relation to the interval between ischaemic conditioning and actual resection were followed. Results After ischaemic conditioning, 33 subjects in total underwent surgery for carcinoma; 19 subjects in group S and 14 subjects in group L. Anastomotic leak incidence was comparable in both groups. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 21% of cases in group S and 7% of cases in group L (not statistically significant). Conclusions A long interval between ischaemic conditioning and oesophagectomy does not adversely affect the postoperative complications. A lower incidence of anastomosis stenoses was found in subjects with a longer interval, however, given the size of our sample, the statistical significance was not demonstrated. Both groups seem comparable in surgical procedure course and postoperative complications.

Department of Surgery University Hospital Brno Bohunice Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Czech Republic

Department of Surgery University Hospital Brno Bohunice Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Czech Republic Department of Gastroenterology University Hospital Brno Bohunice Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Czech Republic

000      

00000naa a2200000 a 4500

001      

bmc18033038

003      

CZ-PrNML

005      

20181022120313.0

007      

ta

008      

181008s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||

009      

AR

024    7_

$a 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066 $2 doi

035    __

$a (PubMed)29909668

040    __

$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2

041    0_

$a eng

044    __

$a enk

100    1_

$a Prochazka, V $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

245    10

$a Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning / $c V. Prochazka, F. Marek, L. Kunovsky, R. Svaton, T. Grolich, P. Moravcik, M. Farkasova, Z. Kala,

520    9_

$a Background Stomach preparation by ischaemic conditioning prior to oesophageal resection represents a potential method of reducing the risk of anastomotic complications. This study compares the results of the anastomotic complications of cervical anastomosis after oesophagectomy with a short interval after ischaemic conditioning (group S) and a long interval (group L). Methods Subjects undergoing oesophagectomy for carcinoma after ischaemic conditioning were divided into two groups. Group S had a median interval between ischaemic conditioning and resection of 20 days, while for group L the median interval was 49 days. Anastomotic leak and anastomotic stenosis in relation to the interval between ischaemic conditioning and actual resection were followed. Results After ischaemic conditioning, 33 subjects in total underwent surgery for carcinoma; 19 subjects in group S and 14 subjects in group L. Anastomotic leak incidence was comparable in both groups. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 21% of cases in group S and 7% of cases in group L (not statistically significant). Conclusions A long interval between ischaemic conditioning and oesophagectomy does not adversely affect the postoperative complications. A lower incidence of anastomosis stenoses was found in subjects with a longer interval, however, given the size of our sample, the statistical significance was not demonstrated. Both groups seem comparable in surgical procedure course and postoperative complications.

650    _2

$a dospělí $7 D000328

650    _2

$a senioři $7 D000368

650    _2

$a anastomóza chirurgická $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D000714

650    _2

$a netěsnost anastomózy $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D057868

650    _2

$a stenóza $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D003251

650    _2

$a nádory jícnu $x chirurgie $7 D004938

650    _2

$a ezofagektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016629

650    _2

$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260

650    _2

$a lidé $7 D006801

650    _2

$a incidence $7 D015994

650    _2

$a přivykání k ischémii $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019194

650    _2

$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297

650    _2

$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875

650    _2

$a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019060

650    _2

$a žaludek $x chirurgie $7 D013270

650    _2

$a časové faktory $7 D013997

655    _2

$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160

655    _2

$a časopisecké články $7 D016428

700    1_

$a Marek, F $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

700    1_

$a Kunovsky, L $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

700    1_

$a Svaton, R $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

700    1_

$a Grolich, T $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

700    1_

$a Moravcik, P $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

700    1_

$a Farkasova, M $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

700    1_

$a Kala, Z $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno Bohunice, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University , Czech Republic.

773    0_

$w MED00000445 $t Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England $x 1478-7083 $g Roč. 100, č. 7 (2018), s. 509-514

856    41

$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29909668 $y Pubmed

910    __

$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0

990    __

$a 20181008 $b ABA008

991    __

$a 20181022120819 $b ABA008

999    __

$a ok $b bmc $g 1339993 $s 1030032

BAS    __

$a 3

BAS    __

$a PreBMC

BMC    __

$a 2018 $b 100 $c 7 $d 509-514 $e 20180618 $i 1478-7083 $m Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England $n Ann R Coll Surg Engl $x MED00000445

LZP    __

$a Pubmed-20181008