-
Something wrong with this record ?
Rheopheresis in treatment of idiopathic sensorineural sudden hearing loss
M. Kostal, J. Drsata, M. Bláha, M. Lánská, V. Chrobok,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2013-12-01 to 2023-12-31
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2013
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2013
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
ProQuest Central
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-02-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2013-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2008
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2013-12-01 to 2023-12-31
- MeSH
- Analysis of Variance MeSH
- Audiometry, Pure-Tone methods MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones administration & dosage MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Drug Resistance MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Hearing Loss, Sudden diagnosis therapy MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Statistics, Nonparametric MeSH
- Recovery of Function MeSH
- Plasmapheresis methods MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Salvage Therapy methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKROUND: Only few therapeutic options exist for patients with refractory sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (SISHL). Little is known about the efficacy of second-line therapies. Rheopheresis seems to be an effective therapeutic possibility. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 106 patients with SISHL were enrolled in the study, of whom 52 were refractory to initial treatment. As salvage therapy, these patients were offered either 3 sessions of rheopheresis (33 pts) or intratympanic steroid treatment through MicroWick application (19 pts). Pure tone audiometry was performed at diagnosis, at the 1st month and the 1st year during the follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the rheopheretic arm had higher hearing loss than in the MicroWick arm (81% vs. 52%, p = 0.04). In spite of this, there was a significant improvement for patients in the rheopheretic arm (27% of hearing loss reduction, p < 0.001) after the 1st month and this remained unchanged during the 1st year, while no improvement was seen in the MicroWick arm (0% of hearing loss reduction, p = 0.424). We found no predictive factor for steroid-failure in first-line therapy. Older age (p = 0.003), presence of vertigo (p = 0.006) and more profound initial hearing loss (p < 0.001) were identified as negative prognostic markers. CONCLUSION: Rheopheresis can be used as a potentially effective and safe salvage therapy for patients with cortico-refractory SISHL.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18033847
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181119144028.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s40463-017-0228-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28662721
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kostal, Milan $u 4th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. kosmil@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Rheopheresis in treatment of idiopathic sensorineural sudden hearing loss / $c M. Kostal, J. Drsata, M. Bláha, M. Lánská, V. Chrobok,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKROUND: Only few therapeutic options exist for patients with refractory sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (SISHL). Little is known about the efficacy of second-line therapies. Rheopheresis seems to be an effective therapeutic possibility. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 106 patients with SISHL were enrolled in the study, of whom 52 were refractory to initial treatment. As salvage therapy, these patients were offered either 3 sessions of rheopheresis (33 pts) or intratympanic steroid treatment through MicroWick application (19 pts). Pure tone audiometry was performed at diagnosis, at the 1st month and the 1st year during the follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the rheopheretic arm had higher hearing loss than in the MicroWick arm (81% vs. 52%, p = 0.04). In spite of this, there was a significant improvement for patients in the rheopheretic arm (27% of hearing loss reduction, p < 0.001) after the 1st month and this remained unchanged during the 1st year, while no improvement was seen in the MicroWick arm (0% of hearing loss reduction, p = 0.424). We found no predictive factor for steroid-failure in first-line therapy. Older age (p = 0.003), presence of vertigo (p = 0.006) and more profound initial hearing loss (p < 0.001) were identified as negative prognostic markers. CONCLUSION: Rheopheresis can be used as a potentially effective and safe salvage therapy for patients with cortico-refractory SISHL.
- 650 _2
- $a hormony kůry nadledvin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000305
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a audiometrie čistými tóny $x metody $7 D001301
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a léková rezistence $7 D004351
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a náhlá nedoslýchavost $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D003639
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a plazmaferéza $x metody $7 D010956
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a obnova funkce $7 D020127
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a záchranná terapie $x metody $7 D016879
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
- 650 _2
- $a neparametrická statistika $7 D018709
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Drsata, Jakub $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bláha, Milan $u 4th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lánská, Miriam $u 4th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Chrobok, Viktor $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00196704 $t Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery $x 1916-0216 $g Roč. 46, č. 1 (2017), s. 50
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28662721 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181119144121 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1340320 $s 1030841
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 46 $c 1 $d 50 $e 20170629 $i 1916-0216 $m Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery $n J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg $x MED00196704
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008