-
Something wrong with this record ?
A large scale prospective clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC colorectal (QLQ-CR29) module in Polish patients with colorectal cancer
B. Sanna, K. Bereza, D. Paradowska, E. Kucharska, IM. Tomaszewska, Z. Dudkiewicz, J. Golec, A. Bottomley, KA. Tomaszewski,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Validation Study
PubMed
28497549
DOI
10.1111/ecc.12713
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Surgical Stomas MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Fecal Incontinence physiopathology psychology MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence MeSH
- Colorectal Neoplasms physiopathology psychology therapy MeSH
- Colostomy psychology MeSH
- Quality of Life * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Body Image MeSH
- Translations MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Psychometrics MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms physiopathology psychology MeSH
- Health Status MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Poland MeSH
The purpose of our study was to assess if the Polish translation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Colorectal Cancer (CRC)-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29) is an acceptable and psychometrically valid measure to collect quality of life (QoL) data in Polish patients with CRC for use in clinical trials and clinical practice. A total of 150 patients undergoing treatment for CRC were prospectively enrolled in the study. Psychometric assessment of the translated QLQ-CR29 structure, reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and clinical validity was subsequently performed. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.70-0.89, indicating acceptable internal consistency. For test-retest reliability, the ICCs for each item ranged from 0.59-0.91, with exceptions for urinary incontinence and dysuria, indicating good to excellent reproducibility. In multi-trait scaling analyses, the criterion for item convergent and divergent validity was satisfied. The correlations between the EORTC QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-C30 scales were mostly low (r < .40), with a few items demonstrating higher correlations. The known group comparisons analyses demonstrated the ability of the questionnaire to distinguish between patients' differing age, stoma status, and treatment intent. The Polish translation of the QLQ-CR29 is a psychometrically reliable and valid tool. The results of this study are congruent with that of EORTC validation.
Department of Clinical Oncology John Paul 2 Specialist Hospital Krakow Poland
Department of Clinical Rehabilitation Bronislaw Czech University of Physical Education Krakow Poland
Department of Gerontology Geriatrics and Social Work Ignatianum Academy Krakow Poland
Department of Gynaecological Care Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
Department of Medical Education Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Cagliari Sardinia Italy
Faculty of Physiotherapy Lodz Medical University Lodz Poland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18033905
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181024160837.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/ecc.12713 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28497549
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Sanna, B $u Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
- 245 12
- $a A large scale prospective clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC colorectal (QLQ-CR29) module in Polish patients with colorectal cancer / $c B. Sanna, K. Bereza, D. Paradowska, E. Kucharska, IM. Tomaszewska, Z. Dudkiewicz, J. Golec, A. Bottomley, KA. Tomaszewski,
- 520 9_
- $a The purpose of our study was to assess if the Polish translation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Colorectal Cancer (CRC)-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29) is an acceptable and psychometrically valid measure to collect quality of life (QoL) data in Polish patients with CRC for use in clinical trials and clinical practice. A total of 150 patients undergoing treatment for CRC were prospectively enrolled in the study. Psychometric assessment of the translated QLQ-CR29 structure, reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and clinical validity was subsequently performed. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.70-0.89, indicating acceptable internal consistency. For test-retest reliability, the ICCs for each item ranged from 0.59-0.91, with exceptions for urinary incontinence and dysuria, indicating good to excellent reproducibility. In multi-trait scaling analyses, the criterion for item convergent and divergent validity was satisfied. The correlations between the EORTC QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-C30 scales were mostly low (r < .40), with a few items demonstrating higher correlations. The known group comparisons analyses demonstrated the ability of the questionnaire to distinguish between patients' differing age, stoma status, and treatment intent. The Polish translation of the QLQ-CR29 is a psychometrically reliable and valid tool. The results of this study are congruent with that of EORTC validation.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a představa o vlastním těle $7 D001828
- 650 _2
- $a kolorektální nádory $x patofyziologie $x psychologie $x terapie $7 D015179
- 650 _2
- $a kolostomie $x psychologie $7 D003125
- 650 _2
- $a fekální inkontinence $x patofyziologie $x psychologie $7 D005242
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a zdravotní stav $7 D006304
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a symptomy dolních močových cest $x patofyziologie $x psychologie $7 D059411
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
- 650 _2
- $a Polsko $7 D011044
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 12
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgické stomie $7 D054047
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a překlady $7 D014177
- 650 _2
- $a inkontinence moči $7 D014549
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a validační studie $7 D023361
- 700 1_
- $a Bereza, K $u Department of Gynaecological Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Paradowska, D $u Department of Clinical Oncology, John Paul II Specialist Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Kucharska, E $u Department of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Social Work, Ignatianum Academy, Krakow, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Tomaszewska, I M $u Department of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Dudkiewicz, Z $u Faculty of Physiotherapy, Lodz Medical University, Lodz, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Golec, J $u Department of Clinical Rehabilitation, Bronislaw Czech University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Bottomley, A $u Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Tomaszewski, K A $u Health Outcomes Research Unit, Department of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Social Work, Faculty of Education, Ignatianum Academy, Krakow, Poland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007221 $t European journal of cancer care $x 1365-2354 $g Roč. 26, č. 6 (2017)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28497549 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181024161345 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1340340 $s 1030899
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 26 $c 6 $e 20170511 $i 1365-2354 $m European journal of cancer care $n Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) $x MED00007221
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008