Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Is Next-Generation Sequencing the way to go for Residual Disease Monitoring in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

M. Kotrova, J. Trka, M. Kneba, M. Brüggemann,

. 2017 ; 21 (5) : 481-492.

Language English Country New Zealand

Document type Journal Article, Review

Grant support
NV16-32568A MZ0 CEP Register

Digital library NLK
Full text - Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2008-05-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2008-05-01 to 1 year ago

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most important independent prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Since it has been implemented into in treatment stratification strategies, cure rates have improved significantly for all age groups. Real time quantitative (RQ)-PCR of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements using allele-specific primers is currently regarded as the gold standard for MRD analysis in ALL, as it is not only highly sensitive and specific but also provides accurate MRD quantification. Following recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), much attention has been devoted to the development of NGS-based MRD assays. This new technique can enhance sensitivity provided that sufficient numbers of cells are analyzed. Recent reports have shown that NGS-MRD also tends to be more specific for relapse prediction than RQ-PCR. In addition, NGS provides information on the physiological B- and T-cell repertoire during and after treatment, which has been shown to be prognostically relevant. However, before implementation of NGS-MRD detection in clinical practice, several issues must be addressed and the whole workflow needs to be standardized, including not only the analytical phase (spike-in calibrators, quality controls) but also the pre-analytical (e.g. sample preparation) and the post-analytical phases (e.g. bioinformatics pipeline, guidelines for correct data interpretation). These topics are currently addressed by a European network, the EuroClonality-NGS Consortium. In conclusion, NGS is a promising tool for MRD detection with the potential to overcome most of the limitations of RQ-PCR and to become the new gold standard for MRD detection in ALL.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033921
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181012104231.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2017 nz f 000 0| 000
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s40291-017-0277-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28452038
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a nz
100    1_
$a Kotrova, Michaela $u Department of Hematology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Langer Segen 8-10, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
245    10
$a Is Next-Generation Sequencing the way to go for Residual Disease Monitoring in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia / $c M. Kotrova, J. Trka, M. Kneba, M. Brüggemann,
520    9_
$a Minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most important independent prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Since it has been implemented into in treatment stratification strategies, cure rates have improved significantly for all age groups. Real time quantitative (RQ)-PCR of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements using allele-specific primers is currently regarded as the gold standard for MRD analysis in ALL, as it is not only highly sensitive and specific but also provides accurate MRD quantification. Following recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), much attention has been devoted to the development of NGS-based MRD assays. This new technique can enhance sensitivity provided that sufficient numbers of cells are analyzed. Recent reports have shown that NGS-MRD also tends to be more specific for relapse prediction than RQ-PCR. In addition, NGS provides information on the physiological B- and T-cell repertoire during and after treatment, which has been shown to be prognostically relevant. However, before implementation of NGS-MRD detection in clinical practice, several issues must be addressed and the whole workflow needs to be standardized, including not only the analytical phase (spike-in calibrators, quality controls) but also the pre-analytical (e.g. sample preparation) and the post-analytical phases (e.g. bioinformatics pipeline, guidelines for correct data interpretation). These topics are currently addressed by a European network, the EuroClonality-NGS Consortium. In conclusion, NGS is a promising tool for MRD detection with the potential to overcome most of the limitations of RQ-PCR and to become the new gold standard for MRD detection in ALL.
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $x metody $7 D059014
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a reziduální nádor $7 D018365
650    _2
$a akutní lymfatická leukemie $x genetika $7 D054198
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a receptory antigenů T-buněk $x genetika $7 D011948
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza DNA $x metody $7 D017422
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Trka, Jan $u CLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kneba, Michael $u Department of Hematology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Langer Segen 8-10, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
700    1_
$a Brüggemann, Monika $u Department of Hematology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Langer Segen 8-10, 24105, Kiel, Germany. m.brueggemann@med2.uni-kiel.de.
773    0_
$w MED00163193 $t Molecular diagnosis & therapy $x 1179-2000 $g Roč. 21, č. 5 (2017), s. 481-492
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28452038 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181012104723 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1341001 $s 1030915
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 21 $c 5 $d 481-492 $i 1179-2000 $m Molecular diagnosis & therapy $n Mol. diag. ther. $x MED00163193
GRA    __
$a NV16-32568A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...