-
Something wrong with this record ?
Development and external validation of new ultrasound-based mathematical models for preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer
Holsbeke C Van, L Ameye, AC Testa, F Mascilini, P Lindqvist, D Fischerova, F Fruhauf, S Fransis, Jonge E de, D Timmerman, E Epstein
Language English Country Great Britain
Grant support
NT13070
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Source
NLK
Wiley Free Content
from 1996 to 1 year ago
PubMed
24123609
DOI
10.1002/uog.13216
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Early Detection of Cancer MeSH
- Cervix Uteri * diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Neoplasm Invasiveness MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Myometrium * diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Endometrial Neoplasms * diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Models, Theoretical MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color * MeSH
- Ultrasonics * trends MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate strategies, using new ultrasound-based mathematical models, for the prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer and compare them with strategies using previously developed models or the use of preoperative grading only. METHODS: Women with endometrial cancer were prospectively examined using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound imaging. More than 25 ultrasound, demographic and histological variables were analyzed. Two logistic regression models were developed: one 'objective' model using mainly objective variables; and one 'subjective' model including subjective variables (i.e. subjective impression of myometrial and cervical invasion, preoperative grade and demographic variables). The following strategies were validated: a one-step strategy using only preoperative grading and two-step strategies using preoperative grading as the first step and one of the new models, subjective assessment or previously developed models as a second step. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the development set and 211 were included in the validation set. The 'objective' model retained preoperative grade and minimal tumor-free myometrium as variables. The 'subjective' model retained preoperative grade and subjective assessment of myometrial invasion. On external validation, the performance of the new models was similar to that on the development set. Sensitivity for the two-step strategy with the 'objective' model was 78% (95% CI, 69-84%) at a cut-off of 0.50, 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) for the strategy with the 'subjective' model and 83% (95% CI, 75-88%) for that with subjective assessment. Specificity was 68% (95% CI, 58-77%), 72% (95% CI, 62-80%) and 71% (95% CI, 61-79%) respectively. The two-step strategies detected up to twice as many high-risk cases as preoperative grading only. The new models had a significantly higher sensitivity than did previously developed models, at the same specificity. CONCLUSION: Two-step strategies with 'new' ultrasound-based models predict high-risk endometrial cancers with good accuracy and do this better than do previously developed models.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg Genk Belgium
Van Holsbeke C Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18037448
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190104102919.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181109s2014 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/uog.13216 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24123609
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Van Holsbeke C $u Van Holsbeke, C. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
- 245 10
- $a Development and external validation of new ultrasound-based mathematical models for preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer / $c Holsbeke C Van, L Ameye, AC Testa, F Mascilini, P Lindqvist, D Fischerova, F Fruhauf, S Fransis, Jonge E de, D Timmerman, E Epstein
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate strategies, using new ultrasound-based mathematical models, for the prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer and compare them with strategies using previously developed models or the use of preoperative grading only. METHODS: Women with endometrial cancer were prospectively examined using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound imaging. More than 25 ultrasound, demographic and histological variables were analyzed. Two logistic regression models were developed: one 'objective' model using mainly objective variables; and one 'subjective' model including subjective variables (i.e. subjective impression of myometrial and cervical invasion, preoperative grade and demographic variables). The following strategies were validated: a one-step strategy using only preoperative grading and two-step strategies using preoperative grading as the first step and one of the new models, subjective assessment or previously developed models as a second step. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the development set and 211 were included in the validation set. The 'objective' model retained preoperative grade and minimal tumor-free myometrium as variables. The 'subjective' model retained preoperative grade and subjective assessment of myometrial invasion. On external validation, the performance of the new models was similar to that on the development set. Sensitivity for the two-step strategy with the 'objective' model was 78% (95% CI, 69-84%) at a cut-off of 0.50, 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) for the strategy with the 'subjective' model and 83% (95% CI, 75-88%) for that with subjective assessment. Specificity was 68% (95% CI, 58-77%), 72% (95% CI, 62-80%) and 71% (95% CI, 61-79%) respectively. The two-step strategies detected up to twice as many high-risk cases as preoperative grading only. The new models had a significantly higher sensitivity than did previously developed models, at the same specificity. CONCLUSION: Two-step strategies with 'new' ultrasound-based models predict high-risk endometrial cancers with good accuracy and do this better than do previously developed models.<ovid:br /><ovid:br />Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 02
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 02
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 02
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a cervix uteri $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D002584
- 650 02
- $a časná detekce nádoru $7 D055088
- 650 12
- $a nádory endometria $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D016889
- 650 02
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 02
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 02
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 02
- $a teoretické modely $7 D008962
- 650 12
- $a myometrium $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D009215
- 650 02
- $a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
- 650 02
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 02
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 02
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 02
- $a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
- 650 02
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 12
- $a ultrazvuk $x trendy $7 D014465
- 650 12
- $a ultrasonografie dopplerovská barevná $7 D018615
- 700 1_
- $a Ameye L
- 700 1_
- $a Testa AC
- 700 1_
- $a Mascilini F
- 700 1_
- $a Lindqvist P
- 700 1_
- $a Fischerová, Daniela $7 xx0074804
- 700 1_
- $a Frühauf, Filip $7 xx0207709
- 700 1_
- $a Fransis S
- 700 1_
- $a de Jonge E
- 700 1_
- $a Timmerman D
- 700 1_
- $a Epstein E
- 773 0_
- $t Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology $g Roč. 43, č. 5 (2014), s. 586-595 $p Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x 0960-7692 $w MED00010717
- 773 0_
- $p Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $g 43(5):586-95, 2014 May
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181109141552 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190104103115 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1349772 $s 1034473
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 43 $c 5 $d 586-595 $x MED00010717 $i 0960-7692 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
- GRA __
- $a NT13070 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a NLK 2018/lp