• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Development and external validation of new ultrasound-based mathematical models for preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer

Holsbeke C Van, L Ameye, AC Testa, F Mascilini, P Lindqvist, D Fischerova, F Fruhauf, S Fransis, Jonge E de, D Timmerman, E Epstein

. 2014 ; 43 (5) : 586-595.

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18037448

Grantová podpora
NT13070 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate strategies, using new ultrasound-based mathematical models, for the prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer and compare them with strategies using previously developed models or the use of preoperative grading only. METHODS: Women with endometrial cancer were prospectively examined using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound imaging. More than 25 ultrasound, demographic and histological variables were analyzed. Two logistic regression models were developed: one 'objective' model using mainly objective variables; and one 'subjective' model including subjective variables (i.e. subjective impression of myometrial and cervical invasion, preoperative grade and demographic variables). The following strategies were validated: a one-step strategy using only preoperative grading and two-step strategies using preoperative grading as the first step and one of the new models, subjective assessment or previously developed models as a second step. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the development set and 211 were included in the validation set. The 'objective' model retained preoperative grade and minimal tumor-free myometrium as variables. The 'subjective' model retained preoperative grade and subjective assessment of myometrial invasion. On external validation, the performance of the new models was similar to that on the development set. Sensitivity for the two-step strategy with the 'objective' model was 78% (95% CI, 69-84%) at a cut-off of 0.50, 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) for the strategy with the 'subjective' model and 83% (95% CI, 75-88%) for that with subjective assessment. Specificity was 68% (95% CI, 58-77%), 72% (95% CI, 62-80%) and 71% (95% CI, 61-79%) respectively. The two-step strategies detected up to twice as many high-risk cases as preoperative grading only. The new models had a significantly higher sensitivity than did previously developed models, at the same specificity. CONCLUSION: Two-step strategies with 'new' ultrasound-based models predict high-risk endometrial cancers with good accuracy and do this better than do previously developed models.Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18037448
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190104102919.0
007      
ta
008      
181109s2014 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/uog.13216 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24123609
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Van Holsbeke C $u Van Holsbeke, C. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
245    10
$a Development and external validation of new ultrasound-based mathematical models for preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer / $c Holsbeke C Van, L Ameye, AC Testa, F Mascilini, P Lindqvist, D Fischerova, F Fruhauf, S Fransis, Jonge E de, D Timmerman, E Epstein
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate strategies, using new ultrasound-based mathematical models, for the prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer and compare them with strategies using previously developed models or the use of preoperative grading only. METHODS: Women with endometrial cancer were prospectively examined using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound imaging. More than 25 ultrasound, demographic and histological variables were analyzed. Two logistic regression models were developed: one 'objective' model using mainly objective variables; and one 'subjective' model including subjective variables (i.e. subjective impression of myometrial and cervical invasion, preoperative grade and demographic variables). The following strategies were validated: a one-step strategy using only preoperative grading and two-step strategies using preoperative grading as the first step and one of the new models, subjective assessment or previously developed models as a second step. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the development set and 211 were included in the validation set. The 'objective' model retained preoperative grade and minimal tumor-free myometrium as variables. The 'subjective' model retained preoperative grade and subjective assessment of myometrial invasion. On external validation, the performance of the new models was similar to that on the development set. Sensitivity for the two-step strategy with the 'objective' model was 78% (95% CI, 69-84%) at a cut-off of 0.50, 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) for the strategy with the 'subjective' model and 83% (95% CI, 75-88%) for that with subjective assessment. Specificity was 68% (95% CI, 58-77%), 72% (95% CI, 62-80%) and 71% (95% CI, 61-79%) respectively. The two-step strategies detected up to twice as many high-risk cases as preoperative grading only. The new models had a significantly higher sensitivity than did previously developed models, at the same specificity. CONCLUSION: Two-step strategies with 'new' ultrasound-based models predict high-risk endometrial cancers with good accuracy and do this better than do previously developed models.<ovid:br /><ovid:br />Copyright &#xa9; 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
590    __
$a bohemika - dle Pubmed
650    02
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    02
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    02
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a cervix uteri $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D002584
650    02
$a časná detekce nádoru $7 D055088
650    12
$a nádory endometria $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D016889
650    02
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    02
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    02
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    02
$a teoretické modely $7 D008962
650    12
$a myometrium $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D009215
650    02
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    02
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    02
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    02
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    02
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    02
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    12
$a ultrazvuk $x trendy $7 D014465
650    12
$a ultrasonografie dopplerovská barevná $7 D018615
700    1_
$a Ameye L
700    1_
$a Testa AC
700    1_
$a Mascilini F
700    1_
$a Lindqvist P
700    1_
$a Fischerová, Daniela $7 xx0074804
700    1_
$a Frühauf, Filip $7 xx0207709
700    1_
$a Fransis S
700    1_
$a de Jonge E
700    1_
$a Timmerman D
700    1_
$a Epstein E
773    0_
$t Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology $g Roč. 43, č. 5 (2014), s. 586-595 $p Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x 0960-7692 $w MED00010717
773    0_
$p Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $g 43(5):586-95, 2014 May
910    __
$a ABA008 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20181109141552 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190104103115 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1349772 $s 1034473
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 43 $c 5 $d 586-595 $x MED00010717 $i 0960-7692 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
GRA    __
$a NT13070 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a NLK 2018/lp

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...