-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bioindication Testing of Stream Environment Suitability for Young Freshwater Pearl Mussels Using In Situ Exposure Methods
M. Bílý, S. Němčíková, OP. Simon, K. Douda, V. Barák, B. Dort,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, audiovizuální média
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2006 do 2018
PubMed Central
od 2006 do 2018
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006 do 2018
PubMed
30247468
DOI
10.3791/57446
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chemické látky znečišťující vodu analýza toxicita MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- mlži účinky léků MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí metody MeSH
- řeky chemie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- audiovizuální média MeSH
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Knowledge of habitat suitability for freshwater mussels is an important step in the conservation of this endangered species group. We describe a protocol for performing in situ juvenile exposure tests within oligotrophic river catchments over one-month and three-month periods. Two methods (in both modifications) are presented to evaluate the juvenile growth and survival rate. The methods and modifications differ in value for the locality bioindication and each has its benefits as well as limitations. The sandy cage method works with a large set of individuals, but only some of the individuals are measured and the results are evaluated in bulk. In the mesh cage method, the individuals are kept and measured separately, but a low individual number is evaluated. The open water exposure modification is relatively easy to apply; it shows the juvenile growth potential of sites and can also be effective for water toxicity testing. The within-bed exposure modification needs a high workload but is closer to the conditions of a natural juvenile environment and it is better for reporting the real suitability of localities. On the other hand, more replications are needed in this modification due to its high-hyporheic environment variability.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19000353
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190122095840.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3791/57446 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30247468
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Bílý, Michal $u Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague; bilym@fzp.czu.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Bioindication Testing of Stream Environment Suitability for Young Freshwater Pearl Mussels Using In Situ Exposure Methods / $c M. Bílý, S. Němčíková, OP. Simon, K. Douda, V. Barák, B. Dort,
- 520 9_
- $a Knowledge of habitat suitability for freshwater mussels is an important step in the conservation of this endangered species group. We describe a protocol for performing in situ juvenile exposure tests within oligotrophic river catchments over one-month and three-month periods. Two methods (in both modifications) are presented to evaluate the juvenile growth and survival rate. The methods and modifications differ in value for the locality bioindication and each has its benefits as well as limitations. The sandy cage method works with a large set of individuals, but only some of the individuals are measured and the results are evaluated in bulk. In the mesh cage method, the individuals are kept and measured separately, but a low individual number is evaluated. The open water exposure modification is relatively easy to apply; it shows the juvenile growth potential of sites and can also be effective for water toxicity testing. The within-bed exposure modification needs a high workload but is closer to the conditions of a natural juvenile environment and it is better for reporting the real suitability of localities. On the other hand, more replications are needed in this modification due to its high-hyporheic environment variability.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a mlži $x účinky léků $7 D049872
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
- 650 _2
- $a řeky $x chemie $7 D045483
- 650 _2
- $a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x analýza $x toxicita $7 D014874
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a audiovizuální média $7 D059040
- 700 1_
- $a Němčíková, Simona $u Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.
- 700 1_
- $a Simon, Ondřej P $u Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague; T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute.
- 700 1_
- $a Douda, Karel $u Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.
- 700 1_
- $a Barák, Vojtěch $u Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.
- 700 1_
- $a Dort, Bohumil $u Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00190569 $t Journal of visualized experiments JoVE $x 1940-087X $g č. 139 (2018)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30247468 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190122100100 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1363821 $s 1038476
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $c 139 $e 20180905 $i 1940-087X $m Journal of visualized experiments $n J. vis. exp. $x MED00190569
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107