-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Lessons Learned from Implementing a New Testing/Educational Tool for Patients Using an Insulin Pump
K. Stechova, M. Vanis, M. Tuhackova, K. Urbaniec, M. Kvapil,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
29883192
DOI
10.1089/dia.2018.0095
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu krev farmakoterapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hypoglykemika aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- inzulin aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- inzulinové infuzní systémy * MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- motivace MeSH
- osobnost MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- vzdělávání pacientů jako téma * MeSH
- zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: To improve insulin pump therapy results, a special test for patients was devised. The model successfully used to achieve a license to operate different machines was followed. METHODS: The test (a practice and a full run, with a time limit) contained 42 questions, each with four optional choices, and could be answered online. Patients could familiarize themselves with the whole question pool first. Patients could repeat a full run attempt if they failed and were offered focused remedial education. The study group composed of adults, 46 females, and 54 males, all treated for type 1 diabetes, 38/100 newly introduced to insulin pump therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-five of 100 patients successfully completed their first full run attempt (80% or higher correct answers) and 3 of 100 on their second full run attempt; 12 of 100 patients were not able to succeed. The median of the test score was 2 mistakes (range 0-17 mistakes). The most problematic topics were diet and insulin regimens and their application. The crucial factor influencing the test score was the willingness to try practice run(s). Those who practiced had a significantly higher total test score with better results in 5 of 8 tested knowledge domains. Age and diabetes existing >15 years had an impact on the result, too. Both patients' and caregivers' opinions on the test were predominantly positive (or neutral). CONCLUSIONS: The type of test introduced is a good tool for checking a patient's theoretical knowledge and indirectly revealing a patient's level of motivation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19000662
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190110094500.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1089/dia.2018.0095 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29883192
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Stechova, Katerina $u 1 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 245 10
- $a Lessons Learned from Implementing a New Testing/Educational Tool for Patients Using an Insulin Pump / $c K. Stechova, M. Vanis, M. Tuhackova, K. Urbaniec, M. Kvapil,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: To improve insulin pump therapy results, a special test for patients was devised. The model successfully used to achieve a license to operate different machines was followed. METHODS: The test (a practice and a full run, with a time limit) contained 42 questions, each with four optional choices, and could be answered online. Patients could familiarize themselves with the whole question pool first. Patients could repeat a full run attempt if they failed and were offered focused remedial education. The study group composed of adults, 46 females, and 54 males, all treated for type 1 diabetes, 38/100 newly introduced to insulin pump therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-five of 100 patients successfully completed their first full run attempt (80% or higher correct answers) and 3 of 100 on their second full run attempt; 12 of 100 patients were not able to succeed. The median of the test score was 2 mistakes (range 0-17 mistakes). The most problematic topics were diet and insulin regimens and their application. The crucial factor influencing the test score was the willingness to try practice run(s). Those who practiced had a significantly higher total test score with better results in 5 of 8 tested knowledge domains. Age and diabetes existing >15 years had an impact on the result, too. Both patients' and caregivers' opinions on the test were predominantly positive (or neutral). CONCLUSIONS: The type of test introduced is a good tool for checking a patient's theoretical knowledge and indirectly revealing a patient's level of motivation.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a krevní glukóza $7 D001786
- 650 _2
- $a diabetes mellitus 1. typu $x krev $x farmakoterapie $7 D003922
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe $7 D007722
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hypoglykemika $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D007004
- 650 _2
- $a inzulin $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D007328
- 650 12
- $a inzulinové infuzní systémy $7 D007332
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a motivace $7 D009042
- 650 12
- $a vzdělávání pacientů jako téma $7 D010353
- 650 _2
- $a osobnost $7 D010551
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vanis, Miroslav $u 1 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol , Prague, Czech Republic . 2 Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Czech Technical University , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 700 1_
- $a Tuhackova, Martina $u 1 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 700 1_
- $a Urbaniec, Krzysztof $u 1 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol , Prague, Czech Republic . 2 Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Czech Technical University , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 700 1_
- $a Kvapil, Milan $u 1 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol , Prague, Czech Republic .
- 773 0_
- $w MED00173679 $t Diabetes technology & therapeutics $x 1557-8593 $g Roč. 20, č. 8 (2018), s. 524-530
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29883192 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190110094703 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1363891 $s 1038785
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 20 $c 8 $d 524-530 $e 20180608 $i 1557-8593 $m Diabetes technology & therapeutics $n Diabetes Technol Ther $x MED00173679
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107