-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol
H. Kandárová, H. Bendova, S. Letasiova, KP. Coleman, WH. De Jong, D. Jírova,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- alternativy testů na zvířatech MeSH
- benchmarking MeSH
- dodecylsíran sodný toxicita MeSH
- dráždivé látky toxicita MeSH
- králíci MeSH
- kůže účinky léků MeSH
- kyselina mléčná toxicita MeSH
- kyseliny heptylové toxicita MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náplasťové testy metody MeSH
- polyethylenglykoly toxicita MeSH
- polyvinylchlorid toxicita MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- testy kožní dráždivosti metody MeSH
- zdravotnické prostředky * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- králíci MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Several irritants were used in the in vitro irritation medical device round robin. The objective of this study was to verify their irritation potential using the human patch test (HPT), an in vitro assay, and in vivo data. The irritants were lactic acid (LA), heptanoic acid (HA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Genapol® X-80 (GP), and Y-4 polymer. Dilute saline and sesame seed oil (SSO) solutions of each were evaluated using a 4 and 18 h HPT and the EpiDerm™ SIT-MD RhE assay; results were then compared to existing rabbit skin irritation test data. Results from the 4 h HPT were negative in most cases except for GP and SDS, while the 18 h HPT also identified some LA, HA, and GP samples as irritants. EpiDerm™ SIT-MD correctly identified all irritants except GP in SSO due to limited solubility. Data from cutaneous rabbit irritation tests were negative, while all intracutaneous results were strongly or weakly positive except for the most dilute GP solutions. These findings indicate that EpiDerm™ SIT-MD results correlate with those from the rabbit intracutaneous test and confirm that RhE assays are suitable replacements for animals in evaluating the tissue irritation potential of medical devices.
MatTek In vitro Life Science Laboratories Bratislava Slovak Republic
Medtronic Biomaterials Department Minneapolis MN USA
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Bilthoven The Netherlands
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19000907
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190121113417.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.02.009 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29462660
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kandárová, Helena $u MatTek In vitro Life Science Laboratories, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: hkandarova@mattek.com.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol / $c H. Kandárová, H. Bendova, S. Letasiova, KP. Coleman, WH. De Jong, D. Jírova,
- 520 9_
- $a Several irritants were used in the in vitro irritation medical device round robin. The objective of this study was to verify their irritation potential using the human patch test (HPT), an in vitro assay, and in vivo data. The irritants were lactic acid (LA), heptanoic acid (HA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Genapol® X-80 (GP), and Y-4 polymer. Dilute saline and sesame seed oil (SSO) solutions of each were evaluated using a 4 and 18 h HPT and the EpiDerm™ SIT-MD RhE assay; results were then compared to existing rabbit skin irritation test data. Results from the 4 h HPT were negative in most cases except for GP and SDS, while the 18 h HPT also identified some LA, HA, and GP samples as irritants. EpiDerm™ SIT-MD correctly identified all irritants except GP in SSO due to limited solubility. Data from cutaneous rabbit irritation tests were negative, while all intracutaneous results were strongly or weakly positive except for the most dilute GP solutions. These findings indicate that EpiDerm™ SIT-MD results correlate with those from the rabbit intracutaneous test and confirm that RhE assays are suitable replacements for animals in evaluating the tissue irritation potential of medical devices.
- 650 _2
- $a alternativy testů na zvířatech $7 D000826
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a benchmarking $7 D019985
- 650 12
- $a zdravotnické prostředky $7 D004864
- 650 _2
- $a kyseliny heptylové $x toxicita $7 D006538
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a dráždivé látky $x toxicita $7 D007509
- 650 _2
- $a kyselina mléčná $x toxicita $7 D019344
- 650 _2
- $a náplasťové testy $x metody $7 D010328
- 650 _2
- $a polyethylenglykoly $x toxicita $7 D011092
- 650 _2
- $a polyvinylchlorid $x toxicita $7 D011143
- 650 _2
- $a králíci $7 D011817
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a kůže $x účinky léků $7 D012867
- 650 _2
- $a testy kožní dráždivosti $x metody $7 D023422
- 650 _2
- $a dodecylsíran sodný $x toxicita $7 D012967
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bendova, Hana $u National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Letasiova, Silvia $u MatTek In vitro Life Science Laboratories, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Coleman, Kelly P $u Medtronic Biomaterials Department, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a De Jong, Wim H $u National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Jírova, Dagmar $u National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004536 $t Toxicology in vitro an international journal published in association with BIBRA $x 1879-3177 $g Roč. 50, č. - (2018), s. 433-438
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29462660 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190121113635 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1364884 $s 1039030
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 50 $c - $d 433-438 $e 20180217 $i 1879-3177 $m Toxicology in vitro $n Toxicol In Vitro $x MED00004536
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107