-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Economic analysis of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis
J. Pokladnikova, P. Maresova, J. Dolejs, AL. Park, B. Wang, X. Guan, F. Musil,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2009
Free Medical Journals
od 2005
PubMed Central
od 2005
Europe PubMed Central
od 2005
ProQuest Central
od 2005-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Taylor & Francis Open Access
od 2005-12-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2005
PubMed
30519026
DOI
10.2147/ndt.s174870
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background: Acupuncture has become a viable option for migraine prophylaxis in Europe; however, despite its wide use, more data on the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness are needed when considering the perspectives of a paying third-party, the patient, and of society in general. The aim was to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of adjuvant acupuncture to pharmacologic treatment vs pharmacologic treatment alone in migraine patients after a 3-month acupuncture course and a 6-month follow-up from all perspectives. Methods: The study involved an open-label randomized clinical trial of patients receiving acupuncture (n=42), and a waiting list control group (n=44). The number of migraine days during the last 28 days, as well as direct and indirect costs were considered. The trial was registered under DRKS00009803. Results: The total cost per patient reached €696 vs €285 after 3 months of acupuncture and €66 vs €132 in the acupuncture and control groups after a 6-month follow-up, respectively (P=0.071). The trends observed in effectiveness and costs from all perspectives are discussed. Conclusion: The inclusion of acupuncture in health care results beneficial mainly for its observed trend in reduced losses of productivity and income, with the latter often exceeding the costs of acupuncture treatment. As such, acupuncture may be recommended as an adjuvant treatment in migraine prophylaxis to standard pharmacotherapy.
Faculty of Informatics and Management University of Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Shanghai China
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19001473
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190108130758.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 nz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2147/NDT.S174870 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30519026
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a nz
- 100 1_
- $a Pokladnikova, Jitka $u Czech-Chinese Centre for Traditional Chinese Medicine, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, jitka.pokladnikova@faf.cuni.cz. Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, jitka.pokladnikova@faf.cuni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Economic analysis of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis / $c J. Pokladnikova, P. Maresova, J. Dolejs, AL. Park, B. Wang, X. Guan, F. Musil,
- 520 9_
- $a Background: Acupuncture has become a viable option for migraine prophylaxis in Europe; however, despite its wide use, more data on the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness are needed when considering the perspectives of a paying third-party, the patient, and of society in general. The aim was to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of adjuvant acupuncture to pharmacologic treatment vs pharmacologic treatment alone in migraine patients after a 3-month acupuncture course and a 6-month follow-up from all perspectives. Methods: The study involved an open-label randomized clinical trial of patients receiving acupuncture (n=42), and a waiting list control group (n=44). The number of migraine days during the last 28 days, as well as direct and indirect costs were considered. The trial was registered under DRKS00009803. Results: The total cost per patient reached €696 vs €285 after 3 months of acupuncture and €66 vs €132 in the acupuncture and control groups after a 6-month follow-up, respectively (P=0.071). The trends observed in effectiveness and costs from all perspectives are discussed. Conclusion: The inclusion of acupuncture in health care results beneficial mainly for its observed trend in reduced losses of productivity and income, with the latter often exceeding the costs of acupuncture treatment. As such, acupuncture may be recommended as an adjuvant treatment in migraine prophylaxis to standard pharmacotherapy.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Maresova, Petra $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dolejs, Josef $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Park, A-La $u Personal Social Services Research Unit, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Wang, Bo $u Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- 700 1_
- $a Guan, Xin $u Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- 700 1_
- $a Musil, Frantisek $u Czech-Chinese Centre for Traditional Chinese Medicine, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, jitka.pokladnikova@faf.cuni.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00183034 $t Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment $x 1176-6328 $g Roč. 14, č. - (2018), s. 3053-3061
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30519026 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190108130959 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1365298 $s 1039596
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 14 $c - $d 3053-3061 $e 20181112 $i 1176-6328 $m Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment $n Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat $x MED00183034
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107