Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Klasifikační systémy hodnocení pes equinovarus congenitusa jejich možné využití v predikci průběhu a výsledku léčby Ponsetiho konceptem
[Classification systems to evaluate the clubfoot and their potential use to predict the course and the results of the ponseti method treatment]

J. Jochymek, J. Turek, T. Peterková

. 2018 ; 85 (5) : 331-335.

Language Czech Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article

Digital library NLK
Source

E-resources Online

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2006

Links

PubMed 30383529

INTRODUCTION The clubfoot ranks among the most frequent paediatric structural deformities of the lower extremity. Currently, the Ponseti method is considered the gold standard for the treatment. To evaluate the degree and severity of the deformity, clinical classification systems have been developed, commonly used in clinical practice. This study aims to verify whether the Pirani and Dimeglio clinical scoring systems can be used to predict the results of treatment by the Ponseti method. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 31 patients. The patients had been referred from the neonatal departments to the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Brno with the diagnosed clubfoot deformity, where they were treated by an erudite orthopaedist experienced in this field according to the Ponseti treatment standards. The Pirani and Dimeglio clinical scoring of the deformity were performed always before the commencement of the therapy and after the second plaster cast fixation. The number of plaster cast fixations, the necessity to carry out achillotomy and the relapse rate were set as the parameters of treatment results. In the first stage of statistical analysis, the respective clinical systems were correlated with the treatment results, in the second part of the study the patients were based on the clinical evaluation divided into 3 groups depending on the severity of the deformity, and these groups were subsequently compared. RESULTS 22 patients from the group (71%) underwent percutaneous achillotomy and in 3 patients (9.7%) a relapse occurred. To correct deformities 7.1 corrective casts were used on average. The correlation between the number of plaster cast fixations and classification systems was significant in all the cases, with the strongest dependency shown by the correlation with the Pirani score after the second corrective cast (r = 0.594, p < 0.001). Positive correlation was found also between the necessity to perform achillotomy and both the classification systems. In this case the strongest correlation was established in the case of the Pirani clinical scoring after the second plaster cast fixation (r = 0.488, p = 0.003). Conversely, significant correlation was not established between the relapse rate and the used classification systems, not even in a single case (p ≥ 0.05). In the second stage of the statistical analysis, in the case of the Pirani scoring before the therapy no difference was found between the individual groups with diverse severity of clubfoot deformity during the evaluation of the aforementioned parameters of treatment results. In the Pirani classification after the second plaster cast fixation, a statistically significant difference was established in the number of plaster cast fixations (p = 0.003) and the necessity to perform achillotomy (p = 0.012). When the Dimeglio scoring was applied before the therapy, a statistically significant difference between the groups was found in the number of plaster cast fixations (p = 0.031) and after the second plaster cast fixation in the relapse rate (p = 0.035). DISCUSSION Although the clinical scoring systems belong to key indicators of severity of the deformity and are commonly used in clinical practice, the current literature provides only an inconsistent picture of their application in predicting the course and the results of treatment. Concurrently, the authors opinions on this issue differ. The scoring in later stages of treatment shows a better predictive value than the scoring at the beginning of the treatment, which was confirmed also by the results of our study. CONCLUSIONS Even though the clinical scoring systems show a certain dependency on the parameters of the treatment results, in practice their predictive function can be used to a limited degree only. The complexity of the evaluation of the deformity itself and subsequently of the results of treatment requires also the use of other parameters than the clinical classifications only so that the prediction of the course and results of the treatment of clubfoot according to Ponseti shows a higher degree of reliability. Key words:clubfoot, Ponseti, Pirani classification, Dimeglio classification.

Classification systems to evaluate the clubfoot and their potential use to predict the course and the results of the ponseti method treatment

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19008828
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190320100059.0
007      
ta
008      
190307s2018 xr a f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2018/057
035    __
$a (PubMed)30383529
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Jochymek, Jiří $u Klinika dětské chirurgie, ortopedie a traumatologie Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno $7 xx0170628
245    10
$a Klasifikační systémy hodnocení pes equinovarus congenitusa jejich možné využití v predikci průběhu a výsledku léčby Ponsetiho konceptem / $c J. Jochymek, J. Turek, T. Peterková
246    31
$a Classification systems to evaluate the clubfoot and their potential use to predict the course and the results of the ponseti method treatment
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION The clubfoot ranks among the most frequent paediatric structural deformities of the lower extremity. Currently, the Ponseti method is considered the gold standard for the treatment. To evaluate the degree and severity of the deformity, clinical classification systems have been developed, commonly used in clinical practice. This study aims to verify whether the Pirani and Dimeglio clinical scoring systems can be used to predict the results of treatment by the Ponseti method. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 31 patients. The patients had been referred from the neonatal departments to the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Brno with the diagnosed clubfoot deformity, where they were treated by an erudite orthopaedist experienced in this field according to the Ponseti treatment standards. The Pirani and Dimeglio clinical scoring of the deformity were performed always before the commencement of the therapy and after the second plaster cast fixation. The number of plaster cast fixations, the necessity to carry out achillotomy and the relapse rate were set as the parameters of treatment results. In the first stage of statistical analysis, the respective clinical systems were correlated with the treatment results, in the second part of the study the patients were based on the clinical evaluation divided into 3 groups depending on the severity of the deformity, and these groups were subsequently compared. RESULTS 22 patients from the group (71%) underwent percutaneous achillotomy and in 3 patients (9.7%) a relapse occurred. To correct deformities 7.1 corrective casts were used on average. The correlation between the number of plaster cast fixations and classification systems was significant in all the cases, with the strongest dependency shown by the correlation with the Pirani score after the second corrective cast (r = 0.594, p < 0.001). Positive correlation was found also between the necessity to perform achillotomy and both the classification systems. In this case the strongest correlation was established in the case of the Pirani clinical scoring after the second plaster cast fixation (r = 0.488, p = 0.003). Conversely, significant correlation was not established between the relapse rate and the used classification systems, not even in a single case (p ≥ 0.05). In the second stage of the statistical analysis, in the case of the Pirani scoring before the therapy no difference was found between the individual groups with diverse severity of clubfoot deformity during the evaluation of the aforementioned parameters of treatment results. In the Pirani classification after the second plaster cast fixation, a statistically significant difference was established in the number of plaster cast fixations (p = 0.003) and the necessity to perform achillotomy (p = 0.012). When the Dimeglio scoring was applied before the therapy, a statistically significant difference between the groups was found in the number of plaster cast fixations (p = 0.031) and after the second plaster cast fixation in the relapse rate (p = 0.035). DISCUSSION Although the clinical scoring systems belong to key indicators of severity of the deformity and are commonly used in clinical practice, the current literature provides only an inconsistent picture of their application in predicting the course and the results of treatment. Concurrently, the authors opinions on this issue differ. The scoring in later stages of treatment shows a better predictive value than the scoring at the beginning of the treatment, which was confirmed also by the results of our study. CONCLUSIONS Even though the clinical scoring systems show a certain dependency on the parameters of the treatment results, in practice their predictive function can be used to a limited degree only. The complexity of the evaluation of the deformity itself and subsequently of the results of treatment requires also the use of other parameters than the clinical classifications only so that the prediction of the course and results of the treatment of clubfoot according to Ponseti shows a higher degree of reliability. Key words:clubfoot, Ponseti, Pirani classification, Dimeglio classification.
650    _2
$a sádrové obvazy $x normy $7 D002370
650    _2
$a pes equinovarus $x klasifikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D003025
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $x normy $7 D012107
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a tenotomie $x metody $7 D058971
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Turek, Jakub $7 xx0231279 $u Klinika dětské chirurgie, ortopedie a traumatologie Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno
700    1_
$a Peterková, Tereza. $7 xx0234648 $u Klinika dětské chirurgie, ortopedie a traumatologie Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 85, č. 5 (2018), s. 331-335
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20190307 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190312141728 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1386354 $s 1047086
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 85 $c 5 $d 331-335 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20190307

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...