-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Disparities in ratings of internal and external applicants: A case for model-based inter-rater reliability
P. Martinková, D. Goldhaber, E. Erosheva,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- posudkové řízení normy MeSH
- školy normy MeSH
- učení fyziologie MeSH
- učitelé normy MeSH
- veřejný sektor MeSH
- výběr pracovníků normy MeSH
- zaměstnanost normy MeSH
- zkreslení výsledků (epidemiologie) MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Ratings are present in many areas of assessment including peer review of research proposals and journal articles, teacher observations, university admissions and selection of new hires. One feature present in any rating process with multiple raters is that different raters often assign different scores to the same assessee, with the potential for bias and inconsistencies related to rater or assessee covariates. This paper analyzes disparities in ratings of internal and external applicants to teaching positions using applicant data from Spokane Public Schools. We first test for biases in rating while accounting for measures of teacher applicant qualifications and quality. Then, we develop model-based inter-rater reliability (IRR) estimates that allow us to account for various sources of measurement error, the hierarchical structure of the data, and to test whether covariates, such as applicant status, moderate IRR. We find that applicants external to the district receive lower ratings for job applications compared to internal applicants. This gap in ratings remains significant even after including measures of qualifications and quality such as experience, state licensure scores, or estimated teacher value added. With model-based IRR, we further show that consistency between raters is significantly lower when rating external applicants. We conclude the paper by discussing policy implications and possible applications of our model-based IRR estimate for hiring and selection practices in and out of the teacher labor market.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012298
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190409160223.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0203002 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30289923
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Martinková, Patrícia $u Department of Statistical Modelling, Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. Institute for Research and Development of Education, Faculty of Education, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Disparities in ratings of internal and external applicants: A case for model-based inter-rater reliability / $c P. Martinková, D. Goldhaber, E. Erosheva,
- 520 9_
- $a Ratings are present in many areas of assessment including peer review of research proposals and journal articles, teacher observations, university admissions and selection of new hires. One feature present in any rating process with multiple raters is that different raters often assign different scores to the same assessee, with the potential for bias and inconsistencies related to rater or assessee covariates. This paper analyzes disparities in ratings of internal and external applicants to teaching positions using applicant data from Spokane Public Schools. We first test for biases in rating while accounting for measures of teacher applicant qualifications and quality. Then, we develop model-based inter-rater reliability (IRR) estimates that allow us to account for various sources of measurement error, the hierarchical structure of the data, and to test whether covariates, such as applicant status, moderate IRR. We find that applicants external to the district receive lower ratings for job applications compared to internal applicants. This gap in ratings remains significant even after including measures of qualifications and quality such as experience, state licensure scores, or estimated teacher value added. With model-based IRR, we further show that consistency between raters is significantly lower when rating external applicants. We conclude the paper by discussing policy implications and possible applications of our model-based IRR estimate for hiring and selection practices in and out of the teacher labor market.
- 650 _2
- $a zkreslení výsledků (epidemiologie) $7 D015982
- 650 _2
- $a zaměstnanost $x normy $7 D004651
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a učení $x fyziologie $7 D007858
- 650 _2
- $a posudkové řízení $x normy $7 D010380
- 650 _2
- $a výběr pracovníků $x normy $7 D010560
- 650 _2
- $a veřejný sektor $7 D017150
- 650 _2
- $a učitelé $x normy $7 D000070777
- 650 _2
- $a školy $x normy $7 D012574
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Goldhaber, Dan $u Center for Education Data and Research, School of Social Work, and the Center for Statistics in the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
- 700 1_
- $a Erosheva, Elena $u Department of Statistics, School of Social Work, and the Center for Statistics in the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Laboratoire J.A. Dieudonné, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Nice, France.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 13, č. 10 (2018), s. e0203002
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30289923 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190409160238 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391608 $s 1050603
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 13 $c 10 $d e0203002 $e 20181005 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405