-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pork protein addition effect on structural and qualitative parameters of frankfurter-type sausage
M. Petrášová, M. Král, M. Pospiech, P. Halamová, B. Tremlová, M. Walczycka,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
30264466
DOI
10.1002/jsfa.9384
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Color MeSH
- Taste MeSH
- Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings analysis MeSH
- Collagen analysis MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Food Handling MeSH
- Meat Products analysis MeSH
- Mechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Food Additives analysis MeSH
- Swine MeSH
- Cattle MeSH
- Hardness MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Cattle MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Several raw materials and additives are used in meat production. In terms of origin, proteins which are the closest related to meat are derived from slaughtered carcasses. The aim of the work was to assess the effect of their addition on the microstructure, texture and colour of frankfurter-type meat products. RESULTS: Calleja staining, instrumental textural analysis and colour analysis were applied. The microscopic results were evaluated qualitatively. Canonical component and Tukey's HSD were used for textural and RGB evaluation. Microscopically, protein matrix formation in products containing pork haemoglobin (155_16) and pork plasma P (158_16) was found to be different from that in other samples. Texture analysis revealed differences (P < 0.05) in shear force between pork haemoglobin 155_16 and all tested samples, in the hardness between the control (154_16) and pork collagen protein (157_16) and between 157_16 and 160_16. Chewiness showed differences between control 154_16 and collagen proteins 157_16. Colour analysis showed a difference between pork haemoglobin (155_16) and other products (P < 0.05) by component analysis. CONCLUSION: All tested additives were incorporated into the protein matrix. Therefore, they may be used as additives even for unrecommended meat products. Addition of pork haemoglobin has a significant impact on the colour of the final product. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012325
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201217134741.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jsfa.9384 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30264466
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Petrášová, Michaela $u Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Pork protein addition effect on structural and qualitative parameters of frankfurter-type sausage / $c M. Petrášová, M. Král, M. Pospiech, P. Halamová, B. Tremlová, M. Walczycka,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Several raw materials and additives are used in meat production. In terms of origin, proteins which are the closest related to meat are derived from slaughtered carcasses. The aim of the work was to assess the effect of their addition on the microstructure, texture and colour of frankfurter-type meat products. RESULTS: Calleja staining, instrumental textural analysis and colour analysis were applied. The microscopic results were evaluated qualitatively. Canonical component and Tukey's HSD were used for textural and RGB evaluation. Microscopically, protein matrix formation in products containing pork haemoglobin (155_16) and pork plasma P (158_16) was found to be different from that in other samples. Texture analysis revealed differences (P < 0.05) in shear force between pork haemoglobin 155_16 and all tested samples, in the hardness between the control (154_16) and pork collagen protein (157_16) and between 157_16 and 160_16. Chewiness showed differences between control 154_16 and collagen proteins 157_16. Colour analysis showed a difference between pork haemoglobin (155_16) and other products (P < 0.05) by component analysis. CONCLUSION: All tested additives were incorporated into the protein matrix. Therefore, they may be used as additives even for unrecommended meat products. Addition of pork haemoglobin has a significant impact on the colour of the final product. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a skot $7 D002417
- 650 _2
- $a kolagen $x analýza $7 D003094
- 650 _2
- $a barva $7 D003116
- 650 _2
- $a potravinářské přísady $x analýza $7 D005503
- 650 _2
- $a manipulace s potravinami $7 D005511
- 650 _2
- $a tvrdost $7 D006244
- 650 _2
- $a heterocyklické sloučeniny tetra- a více cyklické $x analýza $7 D006576
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a masné výrobky $x analýza $7 D008461
- 650 _2
- $a mechanické jevy $7 D055595
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 650 _2
- $a chuť $7 D013649
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Král, Martin $u Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pospiech, Matej $7 uzp2011630633 $u Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Halamová, Petra $u Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tremlová, Bohuslava $u Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Walczycka, Maria $u Department of Animal Products Processing, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003015 $t Journal of the science of food and agriculture $x 1097-0010 $g Roč. 99, č. 4 (2019), s. 1888-1897
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30264466 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201217134704 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391635 $s 1050630
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 99 $c 4 $d 1888-1897 $e 20181102 $i 1097-0010 $m Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture $n J Sci Food Agric $x MED00003015
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405