Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Evaluation of intra-individual test-re-test variability of uroflowmetry in healthy women and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence

L. Lunacek, M. Gärtner, J. Krhut, D. Mika, R. Sykora, P. Zvara,

. 2018 ; 29 (10) : 1523-1527. [pub] 20180224

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the intra-individual variability of uroflowmetry (UFM) in healthy control subjects and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence. METHODS: A total of 35 healthy controls (group A) and 105 women suffering from urinary incontinence were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five women suffered from stress urinary incontinence (group B), 35 women suffered from mixed urinary incontinence (group C), and 35 women with overactive bladder both dry and wet (group D). All participants were asked to perform UFM measurement three times. The following parameters were analyzed: voided volume (VV), peak flow (Qmax), average flow (Qave), volume-corrected peak flow cQmax (cQmax = Qmax/2√ VV), volume-corrected average flow (cQave = Qave/2√ VV), and postvoid residual volume (PVR). Statistical analysis was performed using the analysis of variance on repeated measurements. Relative error was calculated using variation coefficients reported as a percentage of the average. All descriptive characteristics were reported as means ± standard deviation (SD). p values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: No statistically significant intra-individual difference in any of the recorded parameters was identified among the three UFM recordings in groups A, C, and D. The intra-individual variability of the following parameters reached statistical significance in patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence (group B): Qmax (p = 0.0016), Qave (p = 0.0005), and cQave (p = 0.0389). A significant difference was only observed in comparison between the first and second consecutive recordings. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting the high yield and good intra-individual reproducibility of UFM.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012807
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190412100508.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00192-018-3571-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29478111
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Lunacek, Libor $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Evaluation of intra-individual test-re-test variability of uroflowmetry in healthy women and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence / $c L. Lunacek, M. Gärtner, J. Krhut, D. Mika, R. Sykora, P. Zvara,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the intra-individual variability of uroflowmetry (UFM) in healthy control subjects and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence. METHODS: A total of 35 healthy controls (group A) and 105 women suffering from urinary incontinence were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five women suffered from stress urinary incontinence (group B), 35 women suffered from mixed urinary incontinence (group C), and 35 women with overactive bladder both dry and wet (group D). All participants were asked to perform UFM measurement three times. The following parameters were analyzed: voided volume (VV), peak flow (Qmax), average flow (Qave), volume-corrected peak flow cQmax (cQmax = Qmax/2√ VV), volume-corrected average flow (cQave = Qave/2√ VV), and postvoid residual volume (PVR). Statistical analysis was performed using the analysis of variance on repeated measurements. Relative error was calculated using variation coefficients reported as a percentage of the average. All descriptive characteristics were reported as means ± standard deviation (SD). p values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: No statistically significant intra-individual difference in any of the recorded parameters was identified among the three UFM recordings in groups A, C, and D. The intra-individual variability of the following parameters reached statistical significance in patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence (group B): Qmax (p = 0.0016), Qave (p = 0.0005), and cQave (p = 0.0389). A significant difference was only observed in comparison between the first and second consecutive recordings. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting the high yield and good intra-individual reproducibility of UFM.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a reologie $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012212
650    _2
$a hyperaktivní močový měchýř $x patofyziologie $7 D053201
650    _2
$a stresová inkontinence moči $x patofyziologie $7 D014550
650    _2
$a urgentní inkontinence $x patofyziologie $7 D053202
650    _2
$a urodynamika $x fyziologie $7 D014563
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Gärtner, Marcel $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krhut, Jan $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. jan.krhut@fno.cz. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic. jan.krhut@fno.cz.
700    1_
$a Mika, David $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sykora, Radek $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zvara, Peter $u Department of Surgery, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Department of Urology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Biomedical Laboratory, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
773    0_
$w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 29, č. 10 (2018), s. 1523-1527
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29478111 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190412100527 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1392117 $s 1051112
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 29 $c 10 $d 1523-1527 $e 20180224 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...