-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evaluation of intra-individual test-re-test variability of uroflowmetry in healthy women and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence
L. Lunacek, M. Gärtner, J. Krhut, D. Mika, R. Sykora, P. Zvara,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive physiopathology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Rheology methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress physiopathology MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence, Urge physiopathology MeSH
- Urodynamics physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Evaluation Study MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the intra-individual variability of uroflowmetry (UFM) in healthy control subjects and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence. METHODS: A total of 35 healthy controls (group A) and 105 women suffering from urinary incontinence were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five women suffered from stress urinary incontinence (group B), 35 women suffered from mixed urinary incontinence (group C), and 35 women with overactive bladder both dry and wet (group D). All participants were asked to perform UFM measurement three times. The following parameters were analyzed: voided volume (VV), peak flow (Qmax), average flow (Qave), volume-corrected peak flow cQmax (cQmax = Qmax/2√ VV), volume-corrected average flow (cQave = Qave/2√ VV), and postvoid residual volume (PVR). Statistical analysis was performed using the analysis of variance on repeated measurements. Relative error was calculated using variation coefficients reported as a percentage of the average. All descriptive characteristics were reported as means ± standard deviation (SD). p values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: No statistically significant intra-individual difference in any of the recorded parameters was identified among the three UFM recordings in groups A, C, and D. The intra-individual variability of the following parameters reached statistical significance in patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence (group B): Qmax (p = 0.0016), Qave (p = 0.0005), and cQave (p = 0.0389). A significant difference was only observed in comparison between the first and second consecutive recordings. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting the high yield and good intra-individual reproducibility of UFM.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012807
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190412100508.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-018-3571-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29478111
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Lunacek, Libor $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of intra-individual test-re-test variability of uroflowmetry in healthy women and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence / $c L. Lunacek, M. Gärtner, J. Krhut, D. Mika, R. Sykora, P. Zvara,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the intra-individual variability of uroflowmetry (UFM) in healthy control subjects and women suffering from stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence. METHODS: A total of 35 healthy controls (group A) and 105 women suffering from urinary incontinence were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five women suffered from stress urinary incontinence (group B), 35 women suffered from mixed urinary incontinence (group C), and 35 women with overactive bladder both dry and wet (group D). All participants were asked to perform UFM measurement three times. The following parameters were analyzed: voided volume (VV), peak flow (Qmax), average flow (Qave), volume-corrected peak flow cQmax (cQmax = Qmax/2√ VV), volume-corrected average flow (cQave = Qave/2√ VV), and postvoid residual volume (PVR). Statistical analysis was performed using the analysis of variance on repeated measurements. Relative error was calculated using variation coefficients reported as a percentage of the average. All descriptive characteristics were reported as means ± standard deviation (SD). p values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: No statistically significant intra-individual difference in any of the recorded parameters was identified among the three UFM recordings in groups A, C, and D. The intra-individual variability of the following parameters reached statistical significance in patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence (group B): Qmax (p = 0.0016), Qave (p = 0.0005), and cQave (p = 0.0389). A significant difference was only observed in comparison between the first and second consecutive recordings. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting the high yield and good intra-individual reproducibility of UFM.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a reologie $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012212
- 650 _2
- $a hyperaktivní močový měchýř $x patofyziologie $7 D053201
- 650 _2
- $a stresová inkontinence moči $x patofyziologie $7 D014550
- 650 _2
- $a urgentní inkontinence $x patofyziologie $7 D053202
- 650 _2
- $a urodynamika $x fyziologie $7 D014563
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Gärtner, Marcel $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Krhut, Jan $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. jan.krhut@fno.cz. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic. jan.krhut@fno.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Mika, David $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sykora, Radek $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic. Department of Surgical Studies, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zvara, Peter $u Department of Surgery, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Department of Urology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Biomedical Laboratory, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 29, č. 10 (2018), s. 1523-1527
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29478111 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190412100527 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1392117 $s 1051112
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 29 $c 10 $d 1523-1527 $e 20180224 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405