-
Something wrong with this record ?
Ultrasound characteristics of a symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy
V. Weinberger, D. Fischerova, I. Semeradova, J. Slama, D. Cibula, M. Zikan,
Language English Country Taiwan
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
NV17-32030A
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2004
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
Open Access Digital Library
from 2004-03-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
- MeSH
- Asymptomatic Diseases MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Longitudinal Studies MeSH
- Lymph Node Excision statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Lymphocele diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Genital Neoplasms, Female surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Ultrasonography * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To describe the sonographic characteristics of a lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancy, analyze and identify ultrasound characteristics related to the symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphoceles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of ultrasound examination data collected consecutively in patients after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy in one institution. We recorded the number of lymphoceles, localization, size; ultrasound morphology following International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group classification and symptoms. RESULTS: We described and analyzed 227 lymphoceles (150 asymptomatic and 77 symptomatic) in 161 patients. The asymptomatic lymphocele is typically a thick-walled cystic lesion without vascularization, round and unilocular with anechoic or ground-glass content. The symptomatic lymphocele is typically an oval, or ovoid, unilocular lesion with low-level or anechoic content (ground glass content is unlikely to be present, p < 0.001) and the presence of debris and septations. The lymphocele size (p = 0.001), number of lymphoceles (>1) (p = 0.005), septa (p = 0.002), and debris (p < 0.001) were independent ultrasound features correlating to symptoms development. More than one lymphocele (p = 0.047), septations (p = 0.007) and presence of debris (p < 0.001) were independent ultrasound features correlated to infection. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound features of symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele differ. The clues for lymphocele differential diagnosis are the history of lymphadenectomy and the finding cystic lesion with typically ultrasound features of lymphocele, adjacent to great pelvic vessels. Unique ultrasound features of lymphocele may help to distinguish from tumor relapse, hematoma, abscess, seroma or urinoma.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19027687
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190816120607.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2019 ch f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.01.018 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30910151
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ch
- 100 1_
- $a Weinberger, Vit $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Ultrasound characteristics of a symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy / $c V. Weinberger, D. Fischerova, I. Semeradova, J. Slama, D. Cibula, M. Zikan,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To describe the sonographic characteristics of a lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancy, analyze and identify ultrasound characteristics related to the symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphoceles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of ultrasound examination data collected consecutively in patients after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy in one institution. We recorded the number of lymphoceles, localization, size; ultrasound morphology following International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group classification and symptoms. RESULTS: We described and analyzed 227 lymphoceles (150 asymptomatic and 77 symptomatic) in 161 patients. The asymptomatic lymphocele is typically a thick-walled cystic lesion without vascularization, round and unilocular with anechoic or ground-glass content. The symptomatic lymphocele is typically an oval, or ovoid, unilocular lesion with low-level or anechoic content (ground glass content is unlikely to be present, p < 0.001) and the presence of debris and septations. The lymphocele size (p = 0.001), number of lymphoceles (>1) (p = 0.005), septa (p = 0.002), and debris (p < 0.001) were independent ultrasound features correlating to symptoms development. More than one lymphocele (p = 0.047), septations (p = 0.007) and presence of debris (p < 0.001) were independent ultrasound features correlated to infection. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound features of symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele differ. The clues for lymphocele differential diagnosis are the history of lymphadenectomy and the finding cystic lesion with typically ultrasound features of lymphocele, adjacent to great pelvic vessels. Unique ultrasound features of lymphocele may help to distinguish from tumor relapse, hematoma, abscess, seroma or urinoma.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a asymptomatické nemoci $7 D058070
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a nádory ženských pohlavních orgánů $x chirurgie $7 D005833
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
- 650 _2
- $a lymfadenektomie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008197
- 650 _2
- $a lymfokela $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D008210
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a ultrasonografie $7 D014463
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Fischerova, Daniela $u Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University - First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Apolinarska 18, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Semeradova, Ivana $u Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University - First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Apolinarska 18, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Slama, Jiri $u Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University - First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Apolinarska 18, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, David $u Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University - First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Apolinarska 18, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zikan, Michal $u Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University - First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Apolinarska 18, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University - First Faculty of Medicine and Na Bulovce Hospital, Budinova 67/2, 181 00 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: michal.zikan@lf1.cuni.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167593 $t Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology $x 1875-6263 $g Roč. 58, č. 2 (2019), s. 266-272
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30910151 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190816120837 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1432836 $s 1066147
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 58 $c 2 $d 266-272 $e - $i 1875-6263 $m Taiwanese journal of obstetrics and gynecology $n Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol $x MED00167593
- GRA __
- $a NV17-32030A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813