Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Sex and ancestry related differences between two Central European populations determined using exocranial meshes

B. Musilová, J. Dupej, J. Brůžek, Š. Bejdová, J. Velemínská,

. 2019 ; 297 (-) : 364-369. [pub] 20190226

Language English Country Ireland

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago

Assessing sex and population affinity is an important part of the process of biologically identifying unknown human remains, and the skull is usually one of the best structures for assessing both these components of the biological profile. Population affinity is known to be a hugely important variable when estimating sex because the manifestation of sexually dimorphic traits, body size or social and behavioural habits differs across populations. Therefore, for forensic purposes, the estimation of ancestry is a necessary step in the identification of bone remains. The present study improves on the results of a previously developed virtual method using the exocranial surface for sex estimation and assessing population affinity. The ability to assess these components of the biological profile was successfully tested on 208 individuals from two recent European populations. The original classifier was based on geometric morphometric analyses (CPD-DCA, PCA, SVM) and was able to assess the sex of individuals belonging to one French population with an accuracy exceeding 90 % Musilová et al. [1]. To improve the reliability of the method, the Czech population sample was added to the dataset, yielding the highest accuracy of 96.2 %; using the combined dataset, the reliability of the method was 91.8 %. Secondly, we used the same method utilizing inter-population differences to classify individuals based on the shape of the skull. The greatest accuracy rate was 92.8 %, which makes our method a promising tool for sex estimation and assessing population affinity.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19027711
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190819113726.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.034 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30879959
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Musilová, Barbora $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic. Electronic address: musilob@natur.cuni.cz.
245    10
$a Sex and ancestry related differences between two Central European populations determined using exocranial meshes / $c B. Musilová, J. Dupej, J. Brůžek, Š. Bejdová, J. Velemínská,
520    9_
$a Assessing sex and population affinity is an important part of the process of biologically identifying unknown human remains, and the skull is usually one of the best structures for assessing both these components of the biological profile. Population affinity is known to be a hugely important variable when estimating sex because the manifestation of sexually dimorphic traits, body size or social and behavioural habits differs across populations. Therefore, for forensic purposes, the estimation of ancestry is a necessary step in the identification of bone remains. The present study improves on the results of a previously developed virtual method using the exocranial surface for sex estimation and assessing population affinity. The ability to assess these components of the biological profile was successfully tested on 208 individuals from two recent European populations. The original classifier was based on geometric morphometric analyses (CPD-DCA, PCA, SVM) and was able to assess the sex of individuals belonging to one French population with an accuracy exceeding 90 % Musilová et al. [1]. To improve the reliability of the method, the Czech population sample was added to the dataset, yielding the highest accuracy of 96.2 %; using the combined dataset, the reliability of the method was 91.8 %. Secondly, we used the same method utilizing inter-population differences to classify individuals based on the shape of the skull. The greatest accuracy rate was 92.8 %, which makes our method a promising tool for sex estimation and assessing population affinity.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a běloši $7 D044465
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a soudní antropologie $7 D018732
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $7 D021621
650    _2
$a strojové učení $7 D000069550
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a analýza hlavních komponent $7 D025341
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a určení pohlaví podle kostry $x metody $7 D054881
650    _2
$a lebka $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012886
650    _2
$a support vector machine $7 D060388
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Francie $7 D005602
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dupej, Ján $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic; Department of Software and Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Brůžek, Jaroslav $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bejdová, Šárka $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Velemínská, Jana $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001844 $t Forensic science international $x 1872-6283 $g Roč. 297, č. - (2019), s. 364-369
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30879959 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190819114001 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1432860 $s 1066171
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 297 $c - $d 364-369 $e 20190226 $i 1872-6283 $m Forensic science international $n Forensic Sci Int $x MED00001844
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...