-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Long-term relationship between unattended automated blood pressure and auscultatory BP measurements in hypertensive patients
J. Seidlerová, J. Ceral, M. Mateřánková, P. König, I. Řiháček, P. Vysočanová, M. Souček, J. Filipovský,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1998-04-20
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1992
- MeSH
- ambulantní monitorování krevního tlaku MeSH
- automatizace MeSH
- hypertenze diagnóza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření krevního tlaku přístrojové vybavení metody normy MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIMS: Unattended automated office blood pressure (uAutoOBP) has attracted more attention since SPRINT trial had been published. However, its long-term relationship to attended office blood pressure (AuscOBP) is not known. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stable treated hypertensive subjects were examined in four Czech academic hypertension centers. All subjects attended four clinical visits three months apart. uAutoOBP was measured with the BP Tru device; AuscOBP was measured three times with auscultatory method by the physician. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed within one week from the second clinical visit. RESULTS: Data on 112 subjects aged 65.6 ± 10.8 years with mean AuscOBP 128.2 ± 12.2/78.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg are reported. Across the four clinical visits, the uAutoOBP was by 10.1/3.7 mm Hg lower than AuscOBP and the mean difference was similar during all four visits (P≥.061). Both uAutoOBP and AuscOBP had similar intra-individual variability during study follow-up as demonstrated by similar intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, for systolic ICC = 0.50, for diastolic ICC = 0.72). However, the intra-individual variability of the systolic AuscOBP and uAutoOBP difference was high as demonstrated by low ICCs for absolute (ICC = 0.17 [95%CI, 0.09 - 0.25]) and low κ coefficients for categorized differences (κ ≤ 0.16). The main determinant of AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference was AuscOBP level. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference was poor tool to identify hypertension control categories defined on the basis of AuscOBP and ABPM. CONCLUSIONS: Although mean AuscOBP-uAutoOBP differences were relatively similar across the four clinical visits, intra-individual variability of this difference was high. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference was poor tool to identify hypertension control categories defined on the basis of AuscOBP and ABPM. Therefore, uAutoOBP cannot be used as a replacement for ABPM.
c Department of Cardiology Faculty Hospital Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic
e Department of Cardiology Faculty Hospital Bohunice Brno Czech Republic
Internal Department 2 Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19028041
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200110075300.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/08037051.2018.1540260 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30474412
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Seidlerová, Jitka $u a Internal Department II, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic. b Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Long-term relationship between unattended automated blood pressure and auscultatory BP measurements in hypertensive patients / $c J. Seidlerová, J. Ceral, M. Mateřánková, P. König, I. Řiháček, P. Vysočanová, M. Souček, J. Filipovský,
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: Unattended automated office blood pressure (uAutoOBP) has attracted more attention since SPRINT trial had been published. However, its long-term relationship to attended office blood pressure (AuscOBP) is not known. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stable treated hypertensive subjects were examined in four Czech academic hypertension centers. All subjects attended four clinical visits three months apart. uAutoOBP was measured with the BP Tru device; AuscOBP was measured three times with auscultatory method by the physician. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed within one week from the second clinical visit. RESULTS: Data on 112 subjects aged 65.6 ± 10.8 years with mean AuscOBP 128.2 ± 12.2/78.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg are reported. Across the four clinical visits, the uAutoOBP was by 10.1/3.7 mm Hg lower than AuscOBP and the mean difference was similar during all four visits (P≥.061). Both uAutoOBP and AuscOBP had similar intra-individual variability during study follow-up as demonstrated by similar intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, for systolic ICC = 0.50, for diastolic ICC = 0.72). However, the intra-individual variability of the systolic AuscOBP and uAutoOBP difference was high as demonstrated by low ICCs for absolute (ICC = 0.17 [95%CI, 0.09 - 0.25]) and low κ coefficients for categorized differences (κ ≤ 0.16). The main determinant of AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference was AuscOBP level. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference was poor tool to identify hypertension control categories defined on the basis of AuscOBP and ABPM. CONCLUSIONS: Although mean AuscOBP-uAutoOBP differences were relatively similar across the four clinical visits, intra-individual variability of this difference was high. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference was poor tool to identify hypertension control categories defined on the basis of AuscOBP and ABPM. Therefore, uAutoOBP cannot be used as a replacement for ABPM.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a automatizace $7 D001331
- 650 _2
- $a měření krevního tlaku $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $x normy $7 D001795
- 650 _2
- $a ambulantní monitorování krevního tlaku $7 D018660
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hypertenze $x diagnóza $7 D006973
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Ceral, Jiří $u c Department of Cardiology , Faculty Hospital Hradec Králové , Hradec Králové , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mateřánková, Markéta $u a Internal Department II, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a König, Petr $7 xx0243659 $u a Internal Department II, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Řiháček, Ivan $u d Faculty of Medicine, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine , St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vysočanová, Petra $u e Department of Cardiology , Faculty Hospital Bohunice , Brno , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Souček, Miroslav $u d Faculty of Medicine, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine , St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Filipovský, Jan $u a Internal Department II, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic. b Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000810 $t Blood pressure $x 1651-1999 $g Roč. 28, č. 1 (2019), s. 34-39
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30474412 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200110075630 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433190 $s 1066501
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 28 $c 1 $d 34-39 $e 20181125 $i 1651-1999 $m Blood pressure $n Blood Press $x MED00000810
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813