-
Something wrong with this record ?
Prognostic Implications of Magnetic Resonance-Derived Quantification in Asymptomatic Patients With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Doppler Echocardiography-Derived Integrative Approach
M. Penicka, J. Vecera, DC. Mirica, M. Kotrc, R. Kockova, G. Van Camp,
Language English Country United States
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1950 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1950-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 1950-01-01
- MeSH
- Echocardiography, Doppler * MeSH
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging * MeSH
- Mitral Valve diagnostic imaging surgery MeSH
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency diagnosis mortality pathology MeSH
- Area Under Curve MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Proportional Hazards Models MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate method for the quantitative assessment of organic mitral regurgitation (OMR). The aim of the present study was to compare the discriminative power of MRI quantification and the recommended Doppler echocardiography (ECHO)-derived integrative approach to identify asymptomatic patients with OMR and adverse outcome. METHODS: The study population consisted of 258 asymptomatic patients (63±14 years, 60% men) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>60%) and chronic moderate and severe OMR (flail 25%, prolapse 75%) defined by using the ECHO-derived integrative approach. All patients underwent MRI to quantify regurgitant volume (RV) of OMR by subtracting the aortic forward flow volume from the total left ventricular stroke volume. Severe OMR was defined as RV≥60 mL. RESULTS: Mean ECHO-derived RV was on average 17.1 mL larger than the MRI-derived RV (P<0.05). Concordant grading of OMR severity with both techniques was observed in 197 (76%) individuals with 62 (31%) patients having severe OMR (MRI SEV-ECHO SEV) and 135 (69%) patients having moderate OMR (MRI MOD-ECHO MOD). The remaining 61 (24%) individuals had discordant findings (MRI SEV-ECHO MOD or MRI MOD-ECHO SEV) between the 2 techniques. The majority of these differences in OMR classification were observed in patients with late systolic or multiple jets (both κ<0.2). Patients with eccentric jets showed moderate agreement (κ=0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.64). In contrast, a very good agreement (κ=0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) was observed in a combination of holosystolic, central, and single jet. During a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 3.5-6.0 years), 38 (15%) patients died and 106 (41%) either died or developed indication for mitral valve surgery. In separate Cox regression analyses, the MRI-derived left ventricular end-systolic volume index, RV, and OMR category (severe versus moderate), and the ECHO-derived OMR category were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (all P<0.05). The MRI-derived RV showed the largest area under the curve to predict mortality (0.72) or its combination with the development of indication for mitral valve surgery (0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study suggest that the MRI-derived assessment of OMR can better identify patients with severe OMR and adverse outcome than ECHO-derived integrative approach warranting close follow-up and perhaps, early mitral valve surgery.
Cardiovascular Center Aalst OLV Clinic Aalst Belgium
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19028655
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190822093429.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029332 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29269390
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Penicka, Martin $u Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium (M.P., J.V., D.C.M., G.V.C.) martin.penicka@olvz-aalst.be.
- 245 10
- $a Prognostic Implications of Magnetic Resonance-Derived Quantification in Asymptomatic Patients With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Doppler Echocardiography-Derived Integrative Approach / $c M. Penicka, J. Vecera, DC. Mirica, M. Kotrc, R. Kockova, G. Van Camp,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate method for the quantitative assessment of organic mitral regurgitation (OMR). The aim of the present study was to compare the discriminative power of MRI quantification and the recommended Doppler echocardiography (ECHO)-derived integrative approach to identify asymptomatic patients with OMR and adverse outcome. METHODS: The study population consisted of 258 asymptomatic patients (63±14 years, 60% men) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>60%) and chronic moderate and severe OMR (flail 25%, prolapse 75%) defined by using the ECHO-derived integrative approach. All patients underwent MRI to quantify regurgitant volume (RV) of OMR by subtracting the aortic forward flow volume from the total left ventricular stroke volume. Severe OMR was defined as RV≥60 mL. RESULTS: Mean ECHO-derived RV was on average 17.1 mL larger than the MRI-derived RV (P<0.05). Concordant grading of OMR severity with both techniques was observed in 197 (76%) individuals with 62 (31%) patients having severe OMR (MRI SEV-ECHO SEV) and 135 (69%) patients having moderate OMR (MRI MOD-ECHO MOD). The remaining 61 (24%) individuals had discordant findings (MRI SEV-ECHO MOD or MRI MOD-ECHO SEV) between the 2 techniques. The majority of these differences in OMR classification were observed in patients with late systolic or multiple jets (both κ<0.2). Patients with eccentric jets showed moderate agreement (κ=0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.64). In contrast, a very good agreement (κ=0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) was observed in a combination of holosystolic, central, and single jet. During a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 3.5-6.0 years), 38 (15%) patients died and 106 (41%) either died or developed indication for mitral valve surgery. In separate Cox regression analyses, the MRI-derived left ventricular end-systolic volume index, RV, and OMR category (severe versus moderate), and the ECHO-derived OMR category were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (all P<0.05). The MRI-derived RV showed the largest area under the curve to predict mortality (0.72) or its combination with the development of indication for mitral valve surgery (0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study suggest that the MRI-derived assessment of OMR can better identify patients with severe OMR and adverse outcome than ECHO-derived integrative approach warranting close follow-up and perhaps, early mitral valve surgery.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a plocha pod křivkou $7 D019540
- 650 12
- $a dopplerovská echokardiografie $7 D015150
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
- 650 12
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a mitrální chlopeň $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D008943
- 650 _2
- $a mitrální insuficience $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x patologie $7 D008944
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a proporcionální rizikové modely $7 D016016
- 650 _2
- $a ROC křivka $7 D012372
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vecera, Jan $u Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium (M.P., J.V., D.C.M., G.V.C.).
- 700 1_
- $a Mirica, Daniela C $u Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium (M.P., J.V., D.C.M., G.V.C.).
- 700 1_
- $a Kotrc, Martin $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic (M.K., R.K.).
- 700 1_
- $a Kockova, Radka $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic (M.K., R.K.).
- 700 1_
- $a Van Camp, Guy $u Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium (M.P., J.V., D.C.M., G.V.C.).
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001091 $t Circulation $x 1524-4539 $g Roč. 137, č. 13 (2018), s. 1349-1360
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29269390 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190822093708 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433804 $s 1067115
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 137 $c 13 $d 1349-1360 $e 20171221 $i 1524-4539 $m Circulation (New York, N.Y.) $n Circulation (New York) $x MED00001091
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813