-
Something wrong with this record ?
Czech Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory: Translation and Validation in Incurable Patients
H. Kisvetrová, D. Školoudík, L. Danielová, K. Langová, R. Váverková, M. Bretšnajdrová, Y. Yamada,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Validation Study
Grant support
NV16-28628A
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
NLK
Freely Accessible Journals
from 1995 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Factor Analysis, Statistical MeSH
- Critical Illness psychology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasms diagnosis psychology MeSH
- Translating MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Respect * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
CONTEXT: The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) is a valid, reliable screening tool to assess a range of issues that have been reported to affect the sense of dignity in patients with life-limiting conditions. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the item characteristics, factor structure, and reliability of the Czech version of the PDI (PDI-CZ) among cancer and noncancer patients. METHODS: The PDI was translated into the Czech language following state-of-the-art criteria (a five-stage proceeding method for the translation). Two hundred thirty-nine participants completed the study (136 cancer and 103 noncancer patients). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and factor analysis were used for validation of the PDI-CZ. RESULTS: A Czech version of the PDI was obtained. The Cronbach's α for PDI-CZ was 0.92. Item 22 (not feeling supported by my health care providers) did not correlate with any other items, and it was skipped for factor analysis processing for this reason. Factor analysis resulted in a four-factor solution, accounting for 56.34% of the overall variance (factor loadings range, 0.37-0.92). The factor labels were as follows: loss of purpose of life; loss of autonomy; loss of confidence; and loss of social support (internal consistencies range, Cronbach's α 0.58-0.90). Test-retest reliability was assessed with 25 patients after two weeks. The resulting range of the Gwet's coefficient, AC1, was between 0.58 and 1.00. CONCLUSION: The results from the study support the reliability of the PDI-CZ and its future use in patients with incurable cancer and noncancer patients.
Department of Geriatrics University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19028697
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201007082142.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.008 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29128432
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kisvetrová, Helena $u Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: helena.kisvetrova@upol.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Czech Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory: Translation and Validation in Incurable Patients / $c H. Kisvetrová, D. Školoudík, L. Danielová, K. Langová, R. Váverková, M. Bretšnajdrová, Y. Yamada,
- 520 9_
- $a CONTEXT: The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) is a valid, reliable screening tool to assess a range of issues that have been reported to affect the sense of dignity in patients with life-limiting conditions. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the item characteristics, factor structure, and reliability of the Czech version of the PDI (PDI-CZ) among cancer and noncancer patients. METHODS: The PDI was translated into the Czech language following state-of-the-art criteria (a five-stage proceeding method for the translation). Two hundred thirty-nine participants completed the study (136 cancer and 103 noncancer patients). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and factor analysis were used for validation of the PDI-CZ. RESULTS: A Czech version of the PDI was obtained. The Cronbach's α for PDI-CZ was 0.92. Item 22 (not feeling supported by my health care providers) did not correlate with any other items, and it was skipped for factor analysis processing for this reason. Factor analysis resulted in a four-factor solution, accounting for 56.34% of the overall variance (factor loadings range, 0.37-0.92). The factor labels were as follows: loss of purpose of life; loss of autonomy; loss of confidence; and loss of social support (internal consistencies range, Cronbach's α 0.58-0.90). Test-retest reliability was assessed with 25 patients after two weeks. The resulting range of the Gwet's coefficient, AC1, was between 0.58 and 1.00. CONCLUSION: The results from the study support the reliability of the PDI-CZ and its future use in patients with incurable cancer and noncancer patients.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a kritický stav $x psychologie $7 D016638
- 650 _2
- $a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a nádory $x diagnóza $x psychologie $7 D009369
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 12
- $a uznání $7 D000078682
- 650 _2
- $a překládání $7 D014175
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a validační studie $7 D023361
- 700 1_
- $a Školoudík, David $u Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Danielová, Libuše $u Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Langová, Kateřina $u Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Váverková, Renáta $7 xx0252460 $u Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bretšnajdrová, Milena $u Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Yamada, Yukari $u Centre for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005093 $t Journal of pain and symptom management $x 1873-6513 $g Roč. 55, č. 2 (2018), s. 444-450
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29128432 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201007082139 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433846 $s 1067157
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 55 $c 2 $d 444-450 $e 20171109 $i 1873-6513 $m Journal of pain and symptom management $n J Pain Symptom Manage $x MED00005093
- GRA __
- $a NV16-28628A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813