• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ultrasound-guided versus conventional femoral venipuncture for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicentre randomized efficacy and safety trial (ULTRA-FAST trial)

K. Yamagata, D. Wichterle, T. Roubícek, P. Jarkovský, Y. Sato, T. Kogure, P. Peichl, P. Konecný, H. Jansová, P. Kucera, B. Aldhoon, R. Cihák, Y. Sugimura, J. Kautzner,

. 2018 ; 20 (7) : 1107-1114. [pub] 20180701

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028785

Aims: Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently related to vascular access. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided (USG) venipuncture may facilitate the procedure and reduce complication rates. Methods and results: We conducted a multicentre, randomized trial in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF on uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy. The study enrolled consecutive 320 patients (age: 63 ± 8 years; male: 62%) and were randomized to USG or conventional venipuncture in 1:1 fashion. It was prematurely terminated due to substantially lower-than-expected complication rates, which doubled the population size needed to maintain statistical power. While the complication rates did not differ between two study arms (0.6% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.62), intra-procedural outcome measures were in favour of the USG approach (puncture time, 288 vs. 369 s, P < 0.001; first pass success, 74% vs. 20%, P < 0.001; extra puncture attempts 0.5 vs. 2.1, P < 0.001; inadvertent arterial puncture 0.07 vs. 0.25, P < 0.001; unsuccessful cannulation 0.6% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Though these measures varied between trainees (49% of procedures) and expert operators, between-arm differences (except for unsuccessful cannulation) were comparably significant in favour of USG approach for both subgroups. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided puncture of femoral veins was associated with preferable intra-procedural outcomes, though the major complication rates were not reduced. Both trainees and expert operators benefited from the USG strategy. (www.clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02834221).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028785
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190819085632.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/europace/eux175 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28575490
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Yamagata, Kenichiro $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Vídenská 1958/9, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Ultrasound-guided versus conventional femoral venipuncture for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicentre randomized efficacy and safety trial (ULTRA-FAST trial) / $c K. Yamagata, D. Wichterle, T. Roubícek, P. Jarkovský, Y. Sato, T. Kogure, P. Peichl, P. Konecný, H. Jansová, P. Kucera, B. Aldhoon, R. Cihák, Y. Sugimura, J. Kautzner,
520    9_
$a Aims: Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently related to vascular access. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided (USG) venipuncture may facilitate the procedure and reduce complication rates. Methods and results: We conducted a multicentre, randomized trial in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF on uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy. The study enrolled consecutive 320 patients (age: 63 ± 8 years; male: 62%) and were randomized to USG or conventional venipuncture in 1:1 fashion. It was prematurely terminated due to substantially lower-than-expected complication rates, which doubled the population size needed to maintain statistical power. While the complication rates did not differ between two study arms (0.6% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.62), intra-procedural outcome measures were in favour of the USG approach (puncture time, 288 vs. 369 s, P < 0.001; first pass success, 74% vs. 20%, P < 0.001; extra puncture attempts 0.5 vs. 2.1, P < 0.001; inadvertent arterial puncture 0.07 vs. 0.25, P < 0.001; unsuccessful cannulation 0.6% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Though these measures varied between trainees (49% of procedures) and expert operators, between-arm differences (except for unsuccessful cannulation) were comparably significant in favour of USG approach for both subgroups. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided puncture of femoral veins was associated with preferable intra-procedural outcomes, though the major complication rates were not reduced. Both trainees and expert operators benefited from the USG strategy. (www.clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02834221).
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a fibrilace síní $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017115
650    _2
$a periferní katetrizace $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D002406
650    _2
$a předčasné ukončení klinických zkoušek $7 D057239
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a vena femoralis $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D005268
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a punkce $7 D011677
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a intervenční ultrasonografie $7 D018084
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Japonsko $7 D007564
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Wichterle, Dan $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague 4, Czech Republic. Department of Cardiology, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1/1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Roubícek, Tomáš $u Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital Liberec, Husova 357/10, Liberec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jarkovský, Patrik $u Department of Cardiology, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1/1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sato, Yuriko $u Department of Cardiology, Kawakita General Hospital, 1-7-3, Asagaya-kita, Suginami-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
700    1_
$a Kogure, Takamichi $u Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
700    1_
$a Peichl, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Vídenská 1958/9, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Konecný, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Vídenská 1958/9, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jansová, Helena $u Department of Cardiology, Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1/1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kucera, Pavel $u Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital Liberec, Husova 357/10, Liberec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Aldhoon, Bashar $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Vídenská 1958/9, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cihák, Robert $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Vídenská 1958/9, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sugimura, Yoichi $u Department of Cardiology, Kawakita General Hospital, 1-7-3, Asagaya-kita, Suginami-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Josef $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Vídenská 1958/9, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00149837 $t Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1532-2092 $g Roč. 20, č. 7 (2018), s. 1107-1114
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28575490 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190819085906 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433934 $s 1067245
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 20 $c 7 $d 1107-1114 $e 20180701 $i 1532-2092 $m Europace $n Europace $x MED00149837
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...