-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Human evaluation of amphibian species: a comparison of disgust and beauty
D. Frynta, Š. Peléšková, S. Rádlová, M. Janovcová, E. Landová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
1636218
Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
17-15991S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
LO1611
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (CZ)
- MeSH
- fobie psychologie MeSH
- krása * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obojživelníci * MeSH
- odpor * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Animals can evoke a wide range of emotions helping us to choose a quick and appropriate reaction towards them: approach or avoidance in general. This work has focused on disgust evoked by amphibians in humans as well as perceived beauty. Due to the high morphological variability of recent amphibian taxa, we examined humans' cognitive categorisation of 101 amphibian photos and the effect of stimuli characteristics on disgust evaluation or beauty perception of individual groups/species. We also explored how respondents' characteristics, e.g. gender, age and disgust sensitivity (DS-R) influence the disgust and beauty evaluation of picture stimuli on a 7-point Likert scale. The scores of disgust and beauty evaluation were strongly negatively correlated, representing the opposite ends of a single axis, further referred to as the index of preference. The most preferred amphibians belonged to anurans, whereas the least preferred ones were mostly worm-like, legless and small-eyed caecilians. Additional analyses of morphologically diverse anurans showed that species with a round body shape, short forelegs, small eyes, warts, pink and grey colouration, or dark and dull colouration were perceived as disgusting or ugly. The effect of gender and age were only marginal; however, people with higher disgust sensitivity rated amphibians as more disgusting and less beautiful, which might support the hypothesis of a possible disgust involvement in animal fears and phobias. This topic has implications not only for the nature conservation decisions of globally endangered amphibians but also for understanding the evolution of disgust and its generalisation to harmless animals.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19034465
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191011112206.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00114-019-1635-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31263997
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Frynta, Daniel $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague, Czech Republic. National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Human evaluation of amphibian species: a comparison of disgust and beauty / $c D. Frynta, Š. Peléšková, S. Rádlová, M. Janovcová, E. Landová,
- 520 9_
- $a Animals can evoke a wide range of emotions helping us to choose a quick and appropriate reaction towards them: approach or avoidance in general. This work has focused on disgust evoked by amphibians in humans as well as perceived beauty. Due to the high morphological variability of recent amphibian taxa, we examined humans' cognitive categorisation of 101 amphibian photos and the effect of stimuli characteristics on disgust evaluation or beauty perception of individual groups/species. We also explored how respondents' characteristics, e.g. gender, age and disgust sensitivity (DS-R) influence the disgust and beauty evaluation of picture stimuli on a 7-point Likert scale. The scores of disgust and beauty evaluation were strongly negatively correlated, representing the opposite ends of a single axis, further referred to as the index of preference. The most preferred amphibians belonged to anurans, whereas the least preferred ones were mostly worm-like, legless and small-eyed caecilians. Additional analyses of morphologically diverse anurans showed that species with a round body shape, short forelegs, small eyes, warts, pink and grey colouration, or dark and dull colouration were perceived as disgusting or ugly. The effect of gender and age were only marginal; however, people with higher disgust sensitivity rated amphibians as more disgusting and less beautiful, which might support the hypothesis of a possible disgust involvement in animal fears and phobias. This topic has implications not only for the nature conservation decisions of globally endangered amphibians but also for understanding the evolution of disgust and its generalisation to harmless animals.
- 650 12
- $a obojživelníci $7 D000663
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a krása $7 D001504
- 650 12
- $a odpor $7 D000078382
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a fobie $x psychologie $7 D010698
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Peléšková, Šárka $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague, Czech Republic. National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rádlová, Silvie $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Janovcová, Markéta $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague, Czech Republic. National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Landová, Eva $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague, Czech Republic. evalandova@seznam.cz. National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic. evalandova@seznam.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003460 $t Die Naturwissenschaften $x 1432-1904 $g Roč. 106, č. 7-8 (2019), s. 41
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31263997 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191011112626 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451125 $s 1073015
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 106 $c 7-8 $d 41 $e 20190701 $i 1432-1904 $m Naturwissenschaften $n Naturwissenschaften $x MED00003460
- GRA __
- $a 1636218 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
- GRA __
- $a 17-15991S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
- GRA __
- $a LO1611 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (CZ)
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007