Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Scent lineups compared across eleven countries: Looking for the future of a controversial forensic technique

B. Ferry, JJ. Ensminger, A. Schoon, Z. Bobrovskij, D. Cant, M. Gawkowski, I. Hormila, P. Kos, F. Less, E. Rodionova, KT. Sulimov, L. Woidtke, T. Jezierski,

. 2019 ; 302 (-) : 109895. [pub] 20190729

Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19044578
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-02-07 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-02-07 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-02-07 do Před 2 měsíci

Odkazy

PubMed 31419594
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109895
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

A scent lineup is generally a procedure whereby a dog's alerting behavior is used to establish that the dog detects two scents, one from a crime scene and one from a suspect, as deriving from the same person. The aim of this article is to compare methodologies of using dogs in scent lineups as a means of identifying perpetrators of crimes. It is hoped that this comparative approach, looking at countries where the method is currently or has in the past been used, will help determine what issues should be addressed in order to assure that the scent lineup will have a future as a forensic technique. Participants from eleven countries-Belgium, The Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, The Netherlands, Poland, Russia, and the U.S.-completed a survey questionnaire regarding key aspects of the scent lineup procedures used by the police in their countries. Although there was broad overlap on certain matters, such as the use of control and zero trials, collection of decoy scents from individuals of similar gender and race as the suspect, materials for holding scent, frequency of cleaning and changing stations, and use and timing of rewards, there were significant differences in the degree of blindness required, who calls an alert (handler or experimenter), and whether handlers can work with more than one dog. The gap between recommendations and results available from the scientific literature and procedures used in police practice was greater for some countries than others, even taking into account that some scientific methodologies might be expensive or impractical given agency resources. The authors make recommendations about how to go forward if scent lineups are to remain a valid forensic technique.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044578
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200114083922.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109895 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31419594
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Ferry, Barbara $u Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR 5292 - INSERM U 1028 - Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon F-69675 Bron Cedex, France; Forensic Research Group, UQTR, 3351 Boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada. Electronic address: barbara.ferry@cnrs.fr.
245    10
$a Scent lineups compared across eleven countries: Looking for the future of a controversial forensic technique / $c B. Ferry, JJ. Ensminger, A. Schoon, Z. Bobrovskij, D. Cant, M. Gawkowski, I. Hormila, P. Kos, F. Less, E. Rodionova, KT. Sulimov, L. Woidtke, T. Jezierski,
520    9_
$a A scent lineup is generally a procedure whereby a dog's alerting behavior is used to establish that the dog detects two scents, one from a crime scene and one from a suspect, as deriving from the same person. The aim of this article is to compare methodologies of using dogs in scent lineups as a means of identifying perpetrators of crimes. It is hoped that this comparative approach, looking at countries where the method is currently or has in the past been used, will help determine what issues should be addressed in order to assure that the scent lineup will have a future as a forensic technique. Participants from eleven countries-Belgium, The Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, The Netherlands, Poland, Russia, and the U.S.-completed a survey questionnaire regarding key aspects of the scent lineup procedures used by the police in their countries. Although there was broad overlap on certain matters, such as the use of control and zero trials, collection of decoy scents from individuals of similar gender and race as the suspect, materials for holding scent, frequency of cleaning and changing stations, and use and timing of rewards, there were significant differences in the degree of blindness required, who calls an alert (handler or experimenter), and whether handlers can work with more than one dog. The gap between recommendations and results available from the scientific literature and procedures used in police practice was greater for some countries than others, even taking into account that some scientific methodologies might be expensive or impractical given agency resources. The authors make recommendations about how to go forward if scent lineups are to remain a valid forensic technique.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a trestní zákon $7 D003416
650    _2
$a psi $x fyziologie $7 D004285
650    12
$a odoranty $7 D009812
650    _2
$a čich $x fyziologie $7 D012903
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
651    _2
$a Rusko $7 D012426
651    _2
$a Spojené státy americké $7 D014481
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Ensminger, John J $u Delta Hedge Consulting, Rhinebeck, NY, United States. Electronic address: jensminger@msn.com.
700    1_
$a Schoon, Adee $u Animal Detection Consultancy, Leiden, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Bobrovskij, Zbignev $u Lithuanian Police Forensic Science Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania.
700    1_
$a Cant, David $u Canine Service of the Belgian Federal Police, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Gawkowski, Maciej $u Police Cynology, Department of the Police Training Center, Sulkowice, Poland.
700    1_
$a Hormila, IIlkka $u Police Dog Training Centre, Finnish Police University Centre (ret.), Finland.
700    1_
$a Kos, Pavel $u Tuchomerice Dog Regional Group, Odorology Section, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Less, Ferenc $u Education and Training Centre of Hungarian Police Dunakeszi, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Rodionova, Elena $u Institute for Information Transmission Problems RAS, Moscow.
700    1_
$a Sulimov, Klim T $u Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage, Moscow (ret.), Russia.
700    1_
$a Woidtke, Leif $u Leipzig University, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Applied Police Sciences Rothenburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Jezierski, Tadeusz $u Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland. Electronic address: t.jezierski@ighz.pl.
773    0_
$w MED00001844 $t Forensic science international $x 1872-6283 $g Roč. 302, č. - (2019), s. 109895
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31419594 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200114084254 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1482847 $s 1083251
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 302 $c - $d 109895 $e 20190729 $i 1872-6283 $m Forensic science international $n Forensic Sci Int $x MED00001844
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace