Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Psychological treatment of problematic sexual interests: cross-country comparison

K. Klapilová, LY. Demidova, H. Elliott, CA. Flinton, P. Weiss, JP. Fedoroff,

. 2019 ; 31 (2) : 169-180. [pub] 20190515

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20006362

This paper reviews the use of psychotherapeutic approaches to treat individuals who have committed sex crimes and/or have problematic sexual interests (PSI); including types of psychotherapy used, descriptions of preventive and reintegration programmes, and highlighting specific theoretical controversies. In the second part, experts from Canada, the Czech Republic, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, who participated in an International Consensus Meeting held in Prague (2017), summarize treatment programmes in their countries. The comparison revealed some general findings: each country has variability between its own programmes; most countries have different programmes for people who are in custody and who are in the community; the state-directed treatment programmes are primarily focused on criminal individuals, while non-criminal individuals are treated in preventive programmes and/or in special clinics or are untreated; the presence of PSI in patients is acknowledged in most programmes, although specific programmes exclusively for individuals with PSI rarely exist. Studies on effectiveness are difficult to compare due to methodologic, political, and cultural differences. Further communication between more countries to share knowledge about successful treatments and preventive approaches is needed, especially enhanced international collaboration between researchers and clinicians to verify the effectiveness of current clinical and experimental program, rs.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20006362
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200518132557.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/09540261.2019.1591353 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31090478
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Klapilová, Kateřina $u a Laboratory of Evolutionary Sexology and Psychopathology , National Institute of Mental Health , Klecany , Czech Republic. b Faculty of Humanities , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Psychological treatment of problematic sexual interests: cross-country comparison / $c K. Klapilová, LY. Demidova, H. Elliott, CA. Flinton, P. Weiss, JP. Fedoroff,
520    9_
$a This paper reviews the use of psychotherapeutic approaches to treat individuals who have committed sex crimes and/or have problematic sexual interests (PSI); including types of psychotherapy used, descriptions of preventive and reintegration programmes, and highlighting specific theoretical controversies. In the second part, experts from Canada, the Czech Republic, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, who participated in an International Consensus Meeting held in Prague (2017), summarize treatment programmes in their countries. The comparison revealed some general findings: each country has variability between its own programmes; most countries have different programmes for people who are in custody and who are in the community; the state-directed treatment programmes are primarily focused on criminal individuals, while non-criminal individuals are treated in preventive programmes and/or in special clinics or are untreated; the presence of PSI in patients is acknowledged in most programmes, although specific programmes exclusively for individuals with PSI rarely exist. Studies on effectiveness are difficult to compare due to methodologic, political, and cultural differences. Further communication between more countries to share knowledge about successful treatments and preventive approaches is needed, especially enhanced international collaboration between researchers and clinicians to verify the effectiveness of current clinical and experimental program, rs.
650    _2
$a zločinci $x zákonodárství a právo $x psychologie $7 D057237
650    12
$a srovnání kultur $7 D003431
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a parafilie $x prevence a kontrola $x terapie $7 D010262
650    12
$a psychoterapie $7 D011613
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Severní Amerika $7 D009656
651    _2
$a Spojené království $7 D006113
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Demidova, Liubov Y $u c Laboratory of Forensic Sexology, Department for Forensic Psychiatric Assessment in Criminal Proceedings , V. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology , Moscow , Russia.
700    1_
$a Elliott, Helen $u d Bishop Grosseteste University , Lincoln , UK.
700    1_
$a Flinton, Charles A $u e San Francisco Forensic Institute , San Francisco , CA , USA.
700    1_
$a Weiss, Petr $u a Laboratory of Evolutionary Sexology and Psychopathology , National Institute of Mental Health , Klecany , Czech Republic. f Institute of Sexology, 1st Faculty of Medicine , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fedoroff, J Paul $u g Sexual Behaviours Clinic , The Royal and University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Canada.
773    0_
$w MED00005884 $t International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) $x 1369-1627 $g Roč. 31, č. 2 (2019), s. 169-180
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31090478 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200518132557 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1525220 $s 1096418
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 31 $c 2 $d 169-180 $e 20190515 $i 1369-1627 $m International review of psychiatry $n Int Rev Psychiatry $x MED00005884
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...