• Something wrong with this record ?

Les lipides des plantes fossiles dans leurs rapports avec les plantes actuelles. Exemples des flores cénomaniennes d'Anjou et de Bohême [Lipids from fossil plants and their relation to modern plants. Example s of Cenomanian flora from Anjou and Bohemia]

TN. Thanh, S. Derenne, C. Largeau, D. Pons, J. Broutin, A. Mariotti, H. Bocherens,

. 2000 ; 194 (2) : 57-64. [pub] -

Language French Country France

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Comparative analyses of lipids from fossil plants and from their extant counterparts were undertaken in order to test the taxonomic significance of lipids in palaeobotany. The comparison between lipids from a fossil Ginkgoaceae, Eretmophyllum andegavense, and its extant counterpart, Ginkgo biloba, revealed the presence of original molecules, dimethoxyalkylcoumarins, in lipids from both plants. Such compounds confirm, on chemical grounds the relationship between these extant and fossil Ginkgoaceaes. Moreover, differences in n-alkane distribution between E. andegavense and E. obtusum which are very similar morphologically, confirm that these fossil plants do not belong to the same species. Furthermore, comparative analyses of a fossil Cheirolepidiaceae, Frenelopsis alata, and its extant counterpart, the Cupressaceae Tetraclinis articulata, revealed some similarities between these two species although they do not belong to the same family. Otherwise, comparative analyses of fungi-infected and uninfected samples of F. alata demonstrated that these micro-organisms can significantly affect the chemical composition of fossil plant lipids. In conclusion, even if chemical analyses alone are not sufficient to determine the genus or species of a given fossil plant, they can precise the taxonomy of some specimens that have been previously studied by palaeobotanists.

Lipids from fossil plants and their relation to modern plants. Example s of Cenomanian flora from Anjou and Bohemia

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20014012
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200923104207.0
007      
ta
008      
200911s2000 fr f 000 0|fre||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)11098429
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a fre
044    __
$a fr
100    1_
$a Thanh, T N $u Laboratoire de Biogéochimie Isotopique, Université Paris VI, INRA-CNRS-UMR 7618, Paris, France.
245    10
$a Les lipides des plantes fossiles dans leurs rapports avec les plantes actuelles. Exemples des flores cénomaniennes d'Anjou et de Bohême / $c TN. Thanh, S. Derenne, C. Largeau, D. Pons, J. Broutin, A. Mariotti, H. Bocherens,
246    31
$a [Lipids from fossil plants and their relation to modern plants. Example s of Cenomanian flora from Anjou and Bohemia].
520    9_
$a Comparative analyses of lipids from fossil plants and from their extant counterparts were undertaken in order to test the taxonomic significance of lipids in palaeobotany. The comparison between lipids from a fossil Ginkgoaceae, Eretmophyllum andegavense, and its extant counterpart, Ginkgo biloba, revealed the presence of original molecules, dimethoxyalkylcoumarins, in lipids from both plants. Such compounds confirm, on chemical grounds the relationship between these extant and fossil Ginkgoaceaes. Moreover, differences in n-alkane distribution between E. andegavense and E. obtusum which are very similar morphologically, confirm that these fossil plants do not belong to the same species. Furthermore, comparative analyses of a fossil Cheirolepidiaceae, Frenelopsis alata, and its extant counterpart, the Cupressaceae Tetraclinis articulata, revealed some similarities between these two species although they do not belong to the same family. Otherwise, comparative analyses of fungi-infected and uninfected samples of F. alata demonstrated that these micro-organisms can significantly affect the chemical composition of fossil plant lipids. In conclusion, even if chemical analyses alone are not sufficient to determine the genus or species of a given fossil plant, they can precise the taxonomy of some specimens that have been previously studied by palaeobotanists.
650    _2
$a cykasy $x chemie $7 D032462
650    12
$a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
650    12
$a zkameněliny $7 D005580
650    _2
$a houby $x chemie $7 D005658
650    _2
$a plynová chromatografie s hmotnostně spektrometrickou detekcí $7 D008401
650    _2
$a Ginkgo biloba $x chemie $7 D020441
650    _2
$a lipidy $x klasifikace $x izolace a purifikace $7 D008055
650    _2
$a molekulární struktura $7 D015394
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a listy rostlin $x chemie $7 D018515
650    _2
$a stonky rostlin $x chemie $7 D018547
650    _2
$a rostliny $x chemie $x klasifikace $x genetika $x mikrobiologie $7 D010944
650    _2
$a léčivé rostliny $7 D010946
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Francie $7 D005602
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Derenne, S
700    1_
$a Largeau, C
700    1_
$a Pons, D
700    1_
$a Broutin, J
700    1_
$a Mariotti, A
700    1_
$a Bocherens, H
773    0_
$w MED00005351 $t Journal de la Société de biologie $x 1295-0661 $g Roč. 194, č. 2 (2000), s. 57-64
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11098429 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200911 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200923104203 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1563448 $s 1104169
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2000 $b 194 $c 2 $d 57-64 $e - $i 1295-0661 $m Journal de la Société de biologie $n J. Soc. biol. $x MED00005351
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200911

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...