-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Young clonal and non-clonal herbs differ in growth strategy but not in aboveground biomass compensation after disturbance
J. Martínková, A. Klimeš, J. Klimešová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
19-13231S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- biomasa MeSH
- fotosyntéza MeSH
- listy rostlin * MeSH
- rostliny * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Clonal plants have more traits enabling individual persistence (larger belowground storage of buds and assimilates), whereas non-clonal plants have more traits enabling population persistence (a higher reliance on regeneration from seeds). This difference presumably makes those groups respond differently to disturbance. We asked whether this difference is already expressed in the first year of the plant's life. In a pot experiment with 17 congeneric pairs of clonal and non-clonal herbs, we investigated response to a disturbance at the individual level. We were interested whether the leaf C/N ratio (a proxy reflecting active growth and photosynthetic efficiency), the R/S ratio (a proxy for belowground storage) and the amount of compensated biomass differ between clonal and non-clonal herbs. Moreover, we asked whether compensation for the loss of aboveground biomass after disturbance can be predicted by the R/S ratio or explained by the leaf C/N ratio. We found that clonal herbs have higher leaf C/N and R/S ratios than non-clonal herbs. Under disturbance, the leaf C/N and R/S ratios decreased in the clonal herbs and increased in the non-clonal herbs. However, the clonal and non-clonal plants did not differ in biomass compensation ability. Neither the R/S ratio nor the leaf C/N ratio explained the compensation abilities of the herbs. These results show that even though the growth strategies of clonal and non-clonal plants and their reactions to disturbance are different, the groups are similarly capable of compensating for the loss of aboveground biomass. Clonal plants do not have an advantage over non-clonal plants under disturbance during their first year of life.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20024852
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222160015.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00442-020-04724-7 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32749550
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Martínková, Jana $u Department of Experimental and Functional Morphology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. jana.martinkova@ibot.cas.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Young clonal and non-clonal herbs differ in growth strategy but not in aboveground biomass compensation after disturbance / $c J. Martínková, A. Klimeš, J. Klimešová,
- 520 9_
- $a Clonal plants have more traits enabling individual persistence (larger belowground storage of buds and assimilates), whereas non-clonal plants have more traits enabling population persistence (a higher reliance on regeneration from seeds). This difference presumably makes those groups respond differently to disturbance. We asked whether this difference is already expressed in the first year of the plant's life. In a pot experiment with 17 congeneric pairs of clonal and non-clonal herbs, we investigated response to a disturbance at the individual level. We were interested whether the leaf C/N ratio (a proxy reflecting active growth and photosynthetic efficiency), the R/S ratio (a proxy for belowground storage) and the amount of compensated biomass differ between clonal and non-clonal herbs. Moreover, we asked whether compensation for the loss of aboveground biomass after disturbance can be predicted by the R/S ratio or explained by the leaf C/N ratio. We found that clonal herbs have higher leaf C/N and R/S ratios than non-clonal herbs. Under disturbance, the leaf C/N and R/S ratios decreased in the clonal herbs and increased in the non-clonal herbs. However, the clonal and non-clonal plants did not differ in biomass compensation ability. Neither the R/S ratio nor the leaf C/N ratio explained the compensation abilities of the herbs. These results show that even though the growth strategies of clonal and non-clonal plants and their reactions to disturbance are different, the groups are similarly capable of compensating for the loss of aboveground biomass. Clonal plants do not have an advantage over non-clonal plants under disturbance during their first year of life.
- 650 _2
- $a biomasa $7 D018533
- 650 _2
- $a fotosyntéza $7 D010788
- 650 12
- $a listy rostlin $7 D018515
- 650 12
- $a rostliny $7 D010944
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Klimeš, Adam $u Department of Experimental and Functional Morphology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Klimešová, Jitka $u Department of Experimental and Functional Morphology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005783 $t Oecologia $x 1432-1939 $g Roč. 193, č. 4 (2020), s. 925-935
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32749550 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222160011 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1598997 $s 1115538
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 193 $c 4 $d 925-935 $e 20200804 $i 1432-1939 $m Oecologia $n Oecologia $x MED00005783
- GRA __
- $a 19-13231S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125