Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

CT colonography has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids

L. Lambert, J. Jahoda, G. Grusova, P. Hrabak, A. Novotny, A. Burgetova,

. 2020 ; 26 (2) : 82-86. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Turecko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028428

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the detection of internal hemorrhoids. METHODS: Three gastroenterologists systematically reported on the presence of internal hemorrhoids in patients with incomplete colonoscopy, for whom they considered a subsequent CTC. For 44 patients with internal hemorrhoids revealed by optical colonoscopy, an age- and gender-matched cohort of 66 patients with normal findings in the rectum was selected. Endoluminal and transaxial CTC views of the rectum were evaluated for the presence of internal hemorrhoids, the anal verge prominence, asymmetry, and cushion-like appearance on a Likert scale by two experienced radiologists and two gastroenterologists. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for identification of internal hemorrhoids were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.70), respectively. The radiologists showed a better specificity, the gastroenterologists a slightly better sensitivity. When only the rating "very likely" was considered as positive, the specificity rose to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.38-0.62). The interobserver agreement was fair. The best predictor of the presence of hemorrhoids was a prominent anal verge in the supine position (OR=1.789, 95% CI, 1.267-2.525). The difference between supine and prone positions in the evaluated features in patients with internal hemorrhoids was not significant. CONCLUSION: CTC has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids, if the rater is confident in detecting them. Internal hemorrhoids do not substantially change their shape between prone and supine positions.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028428
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210804093309.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 tu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5152/dir.2019.19098 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32116218
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a tu
100    1_
$a Lambert, Lukas $u Department of Radiology, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a CT colonography has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids / $c L. Lambert, J. Jahoda, G. Grusova, P. Hrabak, A. Novotny, A. Burgetova,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the detection of internal hemorrhoids. METHODS: Three gastroenterologists systematically reported on the presence of internal hemorrhoids in patients with incomplete colonoscopy, for whom they considered a subsequent CTC. For 44 patients with internal hemorrhoids revealed by optical colonoscopy, an age- and gender-matched cohort of 66 patients with normal findings in the rectum was selected. Endoluminal and transaxial CTC views of the rectum were evaluated for the presence of internal hemorrhoids, the anal verge prominence, asymmetry, and cushion-like appearance on a Likert scale by two experienced radiologists and two gastroenterologists. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for identification of internal hemorrhoids were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.70), respectively. The radiologists showed a better specificity, the gastroenterologists a slightly better sensitivity. When only the rating "very likely" was considered as positive, the specificity rose to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.38-0.62). The interobserver agreement was fair. The best predictor of the presence of hemorrhoids was a prominent anal verge in the supine position (OR=1.789, 95% CI, 1.267-2.525). The difference between supine and prone positions in the evaluated features in patients with internal hemorrhoids was not significant. CONCLUSION: CTC has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids, if the rater is confident in detecting them. Internal hemorrhoids do not substantially change their shape between prone and supine positions.
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kolonografie počítačovou tomografií $x metody $7 D023881
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a hemoroidy $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D006484
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a rektum $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012007
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jahoda, Jiří $u Department of Radiology, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0262762
700    1_
$a Grusova, Gabriela $u Fourth Department of Medicine, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hrabak, Pavel $u Fourth Department of Medicine, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Novotny, Ales $u Fourth Department of Medicine, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Burgetova, Andrea $u Department of Radiology, First School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00165249 $t Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) $x 1305-3612 $g Roč. 26, č. 2 (2020), s. 82-86
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32116218 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210804093306 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608763 $s 1119608
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 26 $c 2 $d 82-86 $e - $i 1305-3612 $m Diagnostic and interventional radiology $n Diagn Interv Radiol $x MED00165249
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...