• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

New Adjusted Cutoffs for "Normal" Endocardial Voltages in Patients With Post-Infarct LV Remodeling

M. Sramko, S. Abdel-Kafi, RJ. van der Geest, M. de Riva, CA. Glashan, HJ. Lamb, K. Zeppenfeld,

. 2019 ; 5 (10) : 1115-1126. [pub] 20190828

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028809

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine new reference cutoffs for normal unipolar voltage (UV) and bipolar voltage (BV) that would be adjusted for the LV remodeling. BACKGROUND: The definition of "normal" left ventricular (LV) endocardial voltage in patients with post-infarct scar is still lacking. The reference voltage of the noninfarcted myocardium (NIM) may differ between patients depending on LV structural remodeling and the ensuing interstitial fibrosis. METHODS: Electroanatomic voltage mapping was integrated with isotropic late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in 15 patients with nonremodeled LV and 12 patients with remodeled LV (end-systolic volume index >50 ml/m2 with ejection fraction <47% assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance). Reference voltages (fifth percentile values) were determined from pooled NIM segments without late gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS: The cutoffs for normal BV and UV were ≥3.0 and ≥6.7 mV for nonremodeled LV and ≥2.1 and ≥6.4 mV for remodeled LV. Endocardial low-voltage area (LVA) defined by the adjusted cutoffs corresponded better to late gadolinium enhancement-detected scar than did LVA defined by uniform cutoffs. In 15 patients who underwent successful ablation of ventricular tachycardia, the LVA contained >97% of targeted evoked delayed potentials. Insights from whole-heart T1 mapping revealed more fibrotic NIM in patients with remodeled LV compared with nonremodeled LV. CONCLUSIONS: This study found substantial differences in endocardial voltage of NIM in post-infarct patients with remodeled versus nonremodeled LV. The new adjusted cutoffs for "normal" BV and UV enable a patient-tailored approach to electroanatomic voltage mapping of LV.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028809
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114155201.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.07.007 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31648735
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Sramko, Marek $u Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a New Adjusted Cutoffs for "Normal" Endocardial Voltages in Patients With Post-Infarct LV Remodeling / $c M. Sramko, S. Abdel-Kafi, RJ. van der Geest, M. de Riva, CA. Glashan, HJ. Lamb, K. Zeppenfeld,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine new reference cutoffs for normal unipolar voltage (UV) and bipolar voltage (BV) that would be adjusted for the LV remodeling. BACKGROUND: The definition of "normal" left ventricular (LV) endocardial voltage in patients with post-infarct scar is still lacking. The reference voltage of the noninfarcted myocardium (NIM) may differ between patients depending on LV structural remodeling and the ensuing interstitial fibrosis. METHODS: Electroanatomic voltage mapping was integrated with isotropic late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in 15 patients with nonremodeled LV and 12 patients with remodeled LV (end-systolic volume index >50 ml/m2 with ejection fraction <47% assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance). Reference voltages (fifth percentile values) were determined from pooled NIM segments without late gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS: The cutoffs for normal BV and UV were ≥3.0 and ≥6.7 mV for nonremodeled LV and ≥2.1 and ≥6.4 mV for remodeled LV. Endocardial low-voltage area (LVA) defined by the adjusted cutoffs corresponded better to late gadolinium enhancement-detected scar than did LVA defined by uniform cutoffs. In 15 patients who underwent successful ablation of ventricular tachycardia, the LVA contained >97% of targeted evoked delayed potentials. Insights from whole-heart T1 mapping revealed more fibrotic NIM in patients with remodeled LV compared with nonremodeled LV. CONCLUSIONS: This study found substantial differences in endocardial voltage of NIM in post-infarct patients with remodeled versus nonremodeled LV. The new adjusted cutoffs for "normal" BV and UV enable a patient-tailored approach to electroanatomic voltage mapping of LV.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $7 D017115
650    _2
$a jizva $x diagnostické zobrazování $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D002921
650    12
$a elektrofyziologické techniky kardiologické $7 D022062
650    _2
$a endokard $x diagnostické zobrazování $x fyziologie $x patofyziologie $7 D004699
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonance kinematografická $7 D019028
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a infarkt myokardu $x komplikace $x patofyziologie $7 D009203
650    _2
$a referenční hodnoty $7 D012016
650    _2
$a komorová tachykardie $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D017180
650    _2
$a remodelace komor $x fyziologie $7 D020257
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Abdel-Kafi, Saif $u Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van der Geest, Rob J $u Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a de Riva, Marta $u Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Glashan, Claire A $u Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Lamb, Hildo J $u Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Zeppenfeld, Katja $u Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: k.zeppenfeld@lumc.nl.
773    0_
$w MED00193518 $t JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $x 2405-5018 $g Roč. 5, č. 10 (2019), s. 1115-1126
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31648735 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114155200 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1609144 $s 1119989
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 5 $c 10 $d 1115-1126 $e 20190828 $i 2405-5018 $m JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $n JACC Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00193518
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...