Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Online Concentration of Bacteria from Tens of Microliter Sample Volumes in Roughened Fused Silica Capillary with Subsequent Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

M. Horká, J. Šalplachta, P. Karásek, F. Růžička, M. Roth

. 2020 ; 6 (3) : 355-365. [pub] 20200113

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NV16-29916A MZ0 CEP Register

This study presents a timely, reliable, and sensitive method for identification of pathogenic bacteria in clinical samples based on a combination of capillary electrophoresis with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. In this respect, a part of a single-piece fused silica capillary was etched with supercritical water with the aim of using it for static or dynamic cell-surface adhesion from tens of microliter sample volumes. The conditions for this procedure were optimized. Adhered cells of Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant) and of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were desorbed and preconcentrated from the rough part of the capillary surface using transient isotachophoretic stacking from a high conductivity model matrix. The charged cells were swep and separated again in micellar electrokinetic chromatography using a nonionogenic surfactant. Static adhesion of the cells onto the roughened part of the capillary is certainly volumetric limited. Dynamic adhesion allows the concentration of bacteria from 100 μL volumes of physiological saline solution, bovine serum, or human blood with the limits of detection at 1.8 × 102, 1.7 × 103, and 1.0 × 103 cells mL-1, respectively. The limits of detection were the same for all three examined bacterial strains. The recovery of the method was about 83% and it was independent of the sample matrix. A combination of capillary electrophoresis with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry required at least 4 × 103 cells mL-1 to obtain reliable results. The calibration plots were linear (R2 = 0.99) and the relative standard deviations of the peak area were at most 2.2%. The adhered bacteria, either individual or in a mixture, were online analyzed by micellar electrokinetic chromatography and then collected from the capillary and off-line analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry without interfering matrix components.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012792
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220311214656.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00200 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31887008
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Horká, Marie $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the CAS, Veveří 97, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Online Concentration of Bacteria from Tens of Microliter Sample Volumes in Roughened Fused Silica Capillary with Subsequent Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry / $c M. Horká, J. Šalplachta, P. Karásek, F. Růžička, M. Roth
520    9_
$a This study presents a timely, reliable, and sensitive method for identification of pathogenic bacteria in clinical samples based on a combination of capillary electrophoresis with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. In this respect, a part of a single-piece fused silica capillary was etched with supercritical water with the aim of using it for static or dynamic cell-surface adhesion from tens of microliter sample volumes. The conditions for this procedure were optimized. Adhered cells of Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant) and of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were desorbed and preconcentrated from the rough part of the capillary surface using transient isotachophoretic stacking from a high conductivity model matrix. The charged cells were swep and separated again in micellar electrokinetic chromatography using a nonionogenic surfactant. Static adhesion of the cells onto the roughened part of the capillary is certainly volumetric limited. Dynamic adhesion allows the concentration of bacteria from 100 μL volumes of physiological saline solution, bovine serum, or human blood with the limits of detection at 1.8 × 102, 1.7 × 103, and 1.0 × 103 cells mL-1, respectively. The limits of detection were the same for all three examined bacterial strains. The recovery of the method was about 83% and it was independent of the sample matrix. A combination of capillary electrophoresis with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry required at least 4 × 103 cells mL-1 to obtain reliable results. The calibration plots were linear (R2 = 0.99) and the relative standard deviations of the peak area were at most 2.2%. The adhered bacteria, either individual or in a mixture, were online analyzed by micellar electrokinetic chromatography and then collected from the capillary and off-line analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry without interfering matrix components.
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
650    _2
$a bakteriální adheze $7 D001422
650    _2
$a bakteriologické techniky $7 D001431
650    _2
$a elektroforéza kapilární $x metody $7 D019075
650    _2
$a koncentrace vodíkových iontů $7 D006863
650    _2
$a micely $7 D008823
650    _2
$a Pseudomonas aeruginosa $x izolace a purifikace $7 D011550
650    _2
$a oxid křemičitý $x chemie $7 D012822
650    _2
$a spektrometrie hmotnostní - ionizace laserem za účasti matrice $x metody $7 D019032
650    _2
$a Staphylococcus aureus $x izolace a purifikace $7 D013211
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Šalplachta, Jiří $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the CAS, Veveří 97, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Karásek, Pavel $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the CAS, Veveří 97, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ru Žička, Filip $u The Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Pekařská 53, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Roth, Michal $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the CAS, Veveří 97, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00205751 $t ACS infectious diseases $x 2373-8227 $g Roč. 6, č. 3 (2020), s. 355-365
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31887008 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220311214650 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1651037 $s 1133171
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 6 $c 3 $d 355-365 $e 20200113 $i 2373-8227 $m ACS infectious diseases $n ACS infect. dis. $x MED00205751
GRA    __
$a NV16-29916A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...