Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Patient-based reliability of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound scoring system for salivary gland assessment in patients with Sjögren's syndrome

S. Finzel, S. Jousse-Joulin, F. Costantino, P. Hánová, A. Hocevar, A. Iagnocco, H. Keen, E. Naredo, S. Ohrndorf, WA. Schmidt, MA. D'Agostino, L. Terslev, GA. Bruyn

. 2021 ; 60 (5) : 2169-2176. [pub] 20210514

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21018609

BACKGROUND: To assess the reliability of the consensually agreed US definitions of major salivary gland lesions and the US scoring system for salivary gland assessment in patients with SS. METHODS: Nine experienced sonographers scanned and read the US images of both parotid glands (PGs) and submandibular glands (SMGs) in eight patients with primary and secondary SS in two rounds. A consensually agreed four-grade semi-quantitative scoring was applied in B-mode for morphological lesions: grade 0, normal; grade 1, mild inhomogeneity without anechoic or hypoechoic areas; grade 2, moderate inhomogeneity with focal anechoic or hypoechoic areas; grade 3, severe inhomogeneity with diffuse an- or hypoechoic areas occupying the entire gland or fibrous gland. The presence or absence of typical SS lesions, i.e. the Sjögren's signature, was scored binary. Intra- and interreader reliabilities were computed using weighted and unweighted Cohen's and Light's κ coefficients. RESULTS: The mean prevalence of grades 0-3 in PG were 43, 17, 23 and 31% and 28, 14, 33 and 32% for the SMGs, respectively. The weighted κ for intrareader reliability ranged from 0.44 to 1 for grading and 0.64 to 1 for the Sjögren's signature of PG and 0.59 to 1 and -0.09 to 0.6 for SMGs, respectively. The interreader reliability κ for grading in PG was 0.62 (95% CI 0.47, 0.74) and for Sjögren's signature it was 0.36 (95% CI 0, 0.43); in SMG it was 0.62 (95% CI 0.47, 0.72) and 0.03 (95% CI 0, 0.07) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The consensually agreed novel US scoring system for major salivary gland lesions showed substantial intra- and interreader reliability in patients with SS. The reliability of the Sjögren's signature was moderate.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018609
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100211.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa471 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33085747
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Finzel, Stephanie $u Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
245    10
$a Patient-based reliability of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound scoring system for salivary gland assessment in patients with Sjögren's syndrome / $c S. Finzel, S. Jousse-Joulin, F. Costantino, P. Hánová, A. Hocevar, A. Iagnocco, H. Keen, E. Naredo, S. Ohrndorf, WA. Schmidt, MA. D'Agostino, L. Terslev, GA. Bruyn
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: To assess the reliability of the consensually agreed US definitions of major salivary gland lesions and the US scoring system for salivary gland assessment in patients with SS. METHODS: Nine experienced sonographers scanned and read the US images of both parotid glands (PGs) and submandibular glands (SMGs) in eight patients with primary and secondary SS in two rounds. A consensually agreed four-grade semi-quantitative scoring was applied in B-mode for morphological lesions: grade 0, normal; grade 1, mild inhomogeneity without anechoic or hypoechoic areas; grade 2, moderate inhomogeneity with focal anechoic or hypoechoic areas; grade 3, severe inhomogeneity with diffuse an- or hypoechoic areas occupying the entire gland or fibrous gland. The presence or absence of typical SS lesions, i.e. the Sjögren's signature, was scored binary. Intra- and interreader reliabilities were computed using weighted and unweighted Cohen's and Light's κ coefficients. RESULTS: The mean prevalence of grades 0-3 in PG were 43, 17, 23 and 31% and 28, 14, 33 and 32% for the SMGs, respectively. The weighted κ for intrareader reliability ranged from 0.44 to 1 for grading and 0.64 to 1 for the Sjögren's signature of PG and 0.59 to 1 and -0.09 to 0.6 for SMGs, respectively. The interreader reliability κ for grading in PG was 0.62 (95% CI 0.47, 0.74) and for Sjögren's signature it was 0.36 (95% CI 0, 0.43); in SMG it was 0.62 (95% CI 0.47, 0.72) and 0.03 (95% CI 0, 0.07) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The consensually agreed novel US scoring system for major salivary gland lesions showed substantial intra- and interreader reliability in patients with SS. The reliability of the Sjögren's signature was moderate.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče $7 D017063
650    _2
$a parotis $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D010306
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a Sjögrenův syndrom $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012859
650    _2
$a podčelistní slinná žláza $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D013363
650    _2
$a ultrasonografie $7 D014463
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jousse-Joulin, Sandrine $u Rheumatology Department, Chu de Brest, University of Brest, INSERM, Brest, France
700    1_
$a Costantino, Félicie $u Department of Rheumatology, AP-HP Ambroise Paré Hospital, University of Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
700    1_
$a Hánová, Petra $u Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hocevar, Alojzija $u Rheumatology Department, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Iagnocco, Annamaria $u Academic Rheumatology Centre, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Keen, Helen $u Rheumatology Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
700    1_
$a Naredo, Esperanza $u Rheumatology Department, Joint and Bone Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Ohrndorf, Sarah $u Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a Schmidt, Wolfgang A $u Medical Centre for Rheumatology Berlin-Buch, Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a D'Agostino, Maria Antonietta $u Department of Rheumatology, AP-HP Ambroise Paré Hospital, University of Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
700    1_
$a Terslev, Lene $u Centre for Rheumatology and Spinal Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
700    1_
$a Bruyn, George A $u Department of Rheumatology, MC Groep Hospitals, Lelystad, The Netherlands
773    0_
$w MED00011379 $t Rheumatology (Oxford, England) $x 1462-0332 $g Roč. 60, č. 5 (2021), s. 2169-2176
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33085747 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100211 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689641 $s 1139055
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 60 $c 5 $d 2169-2176 $e 20210514 $i 1462-0332 $m Rheumatology $n Rheumatology (Oxford) $x MED00011379
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options