Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Fluoroscopic Epidural Steroid Injection: Pain Relief in Discogenic Sciatica Versus Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. A Study on Middle Eastern Patients

T. Shamov, J. Y. Al-Hashel, R. T. Rоusseff

. 2020 ; 63 (2) : 73-78. [pub] 20200810

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21021233

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of epidural steroid injections (ESI) in patients with discogenic sciatica (Sci) versus patients with lumbar canal stenosis (LSS), not controlled by conservative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study, 80 patients with Sci and 66 with LSS were included. A single ESI (10 mg dexamethasone in 3 cc 0.25% bupivacaine) was applied under fluoroscopic control: one level above the highest stenotic level, in the posterior epidural space, via interlaminar approach in LSS and at the prolapse level, in the anterior epidural space, via transforaminal route in Sci. Pain intensity was assessed by VAS at baseline and on days 1, 15 and 30 after intervention. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 78 Sci and 63 LSS patients. Patients with Sci responded significantly better. At one month, pain reduction over 50% was achieved in 63% (52.3-73.7% at p = 0.95) of Sci but only in 35% (23.2-46.8%) of LSS (p = 0.03). Return to pre-intervention level happened in 47% (34.7-59.3%) of LSS versus 14% (6.3-21.7%) of Sci patients (p = 0.01). In 5 patients the procedure failed, without resulting morbidity. CONCLUSION: ESI are more effective in patients with Sci than in single level LSS. In multiple level LSS, results are disappointing.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21021233
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210920090743.0
007      
ta
008      
210806s2020 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.14712/18059694.2020.20 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32771072
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Shamov, Todor $u Armed Forces Hospital "Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah", Subhan, 46012, Kuwait $u Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, St Georgi Sofijski Str 3, 1606, Sofia, Bulgaria
245    10
$a Fluoroscopic Epidural Steroid Injection: Pain Relief in Discogenic Sciatica Versus Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. A Study on Middle Eastern Patients / $c T. Shamov, J. Y. Al-Hashel, R. T. Rоusseff
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of epidural steroid injections (ESI) in patients with discogenic sciatica (Sci) versus patients with lumbar canal stenosis (LSS), not controlled by conservative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study, 80 patients with Sci and 66 with LSS were included. A single ESI (10 mg dexamethasone in 3 cc 0.25% bupivacaine) was applied under fluoroscopic control: one level above the highest stenotic level, in the posterior epidural space, via interlaminar approach in LSS and at the prolapse level, in the anterior epidural space, via transforaminal route in Sci. Pain intensity was assessed by VAS at baseline and on days 1, 15 and 30 after intervention. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 78 Sci and 63 LSS patients. Patients with Sci responded significantly better. At one month, pain reduction over 50% was achieved in 63% (52.3-73.7% at p = 0.95) of Sci but only in 35% (23.2-46.8%) of LSS (p = 0.03). Return to pre-intervention level happened in 47% (34.7-59.3%) of LSS versus 14% (6.3-21.7%) of Sci patients (p = 0.01). In 5 patients the procedure failed, without resulting morbidity. CONCLUSION: ESI are more effective in patients with Sci than in single level LSS. In multiple level LSS, results are disappointing.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a epidurální analgezie $7 D015360
650    _2
$a anestetika lokální $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000779
650    _2
$a antiflogistika $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000893
650    _2
$a bupivakain $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D002045
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a dexamethason $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D003907
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fluoroskopie $7 D005471
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a degenerace meziobratlové ploténky $x komplikace $7 D055959
650    _2
$a výhřez meziobratlové ploténky $x komplikace $7 D007405
650    _2
$a lumbalgie $x farmakoterapie $x etiologie $7 D017116
650    _2
$a bederní obratle $7 D008159
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a měření bolesti $7 D010147
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a ischialgie $x farmakoterapie $x etiologie $7 D012585
650    _2
$a spinální stenóza $x komplikace $7 D013130
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Al-Hashel, Jasem Y. $u Department of Neurology, Ibn-Sina Hospital, Sabah Health Area, Safat 13115, Kuwait
700    1_
$a Rоusseff, Rossen T. $u Department of Neurology, Ibn-Sina Hospital, Sabah Health Area, Safat 13115, Kuwait
773    0_
$w MED00010947 $t Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) $x 1805-9694 $g Roč. 63, č. 2 (2020), s. 73-78
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32771072 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 3077 $c 1072 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210806 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830162330 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1699325 $s 1141686
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 63 $c 2 $d 73-78 $e 20200810 $i 1805-9694 $m Acta Medica $n Acta Med. (Hradec Král.) $x MED00010947
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20210806

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace