-
Something wrong with this record ?
Neuromodulation in the treatment of postoperative epidural fibrosis: comparison of the extent of epidural fibrosis and the effect of stimulation
V. Masopust, J. Holubová, P. Skalický, R. Rokyta, J. Fricová, J. Lacman, D. Netuka, J. Patríková, K. Janoušková
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 1991
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
PubMed Central
from 2020
ProQuest Central
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1998
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Epidural Space diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome complications MeSH
- Fibrosis therapy MeSH
- Cicatrix MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Low Back Pain MeSH
- Lumbosacral Region MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Pain Measurement MeSH
- Spinal Cord Stimulation methods MeSH
- Neuralgia therapy MeSH
- Postoperative Complications diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
The goal was to prove that when a cohort of patients is chosen precisely, dorsal column stimulation provides significant improvement to quality of life. We studied a cohort of 50 patients with the history of failed back surgery syndrome coupled with epidural fibrosis (EF). A percutaneous implantation technique was used in each of the 50 patients. The study group was composed of 20 women and 28 men aged 26-67 years (mean age 49). A prospective observational questionnaire-based study was used. According to the methods, Ross's classification was adjusted to four degrees of scar size for our study objective. Despite this adjustment, it was not possible to statistically evaluate our research, due to very similar results in Groups I, III and IV. Patients without epidural fibrosis were assigned to Group 0, and patients with EF of different ranges were assigned to Group 1. The mean change in visual analogue scale DeltaVAS after our division into Group 0 was 4.82; for Group 1 it was 6.13. Evaluation of EF and DeltaVAS correlation by paired t-test shows a statistically higher effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the epidural fibrosis group, compared to group 0 without postoperative epidural fibrosis (p=0.008). The extent of epidural fibrosis is an important factor for Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). FBSS is the basis for the existence of neuropathic pain after lumbar spinal surgery. There is clear evidence of a correlation between patients with epidural scar formation on MR scan and the effect of dorsal column stimulation.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Military University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Radiology Military University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22000847
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220202102446.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220106s2021 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.33549/physiolres.934617 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33982586
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Masopust, Václav $7 xx0061196 $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Neuromodulation in the treatment of postoperative epidural fibrosis: comparison of the extent of epidural fibrosis and the effect of stimulation / $c V. Masopust, J. Holubová, P. Skalický, R. Rokyta, J. Fricová, J. Lacman, D. Netuka, J. Patríková, K. Janoušková
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a The goal was to prove that when a cohort of patients is chosen precisely, dorsal column stimulation provides significant improvement to quality of life. We studied a cohort of 50 patients with the history of failed back surgery syndrome coupled with epidural fibrosis (EF). A percutaneous implantation technique was used in each of the 50 patients. The study group was composed of 20 women and 28 men aged 26-67 years (mean age 49). A prospective observational questionnaire-based study was used. According to the methods, Ross's classification was adjusted to four degrees of scar size for our study objective. Despite this adjustment, it was not possible to statistically evaluate our research, due to very similar results in Groups I, III and IV. Patients without epidural fibrosis were assigned to Group 0, and patients with EF of different ranges were assigned to Group 1. The mean change in visual analogue scale DeltaVAS after our division into Group 0 was 4.82; for Group 1 it was 6.13. Evaluation of EF and DeltaVAS correlation by paired t-test shows a statistically higher effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the epidural fibrosis group, compared to group 0 without postoperative epidural fibrosis (p=0.008). The extent of epidural fibrosis is an important factor for Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). FBSS is the basis for the existence of neuropathic pain after lumbar spinal surgery. There is clear evidence of a correlation between patients with epidural scar formation on MR scan and the effect of dorsal column stimulation.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a jizva $7 D002921
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a epidurální prostor $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D004824
- 650 _2
- $a failed back surgery syndrom $x komplikace $7 D055111
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fibróza $x terapie $7 D005355
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lumbalgie $7 D017116
- 650 _2
- $a lumbosakrální krajina $7 D008161
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neuralgie $x terapie $7 D009437
- 650 _2
- $a měření bolesti $7 D010147
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a míšní stimulace $x metody $7 D062187
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Holubová, Jana $7 xx0239449 $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Skalický, Petr $7 xx0255110 $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rokyta, Richard, $d 1938- $7 nlk19990073780 $u Department of Normal, Pathological and Clinical Physiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fricová, Jitka, $d 1971- $7 xx0105524 $u Department of Normal, Pathological and Clinical Physiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lacman, Jiří $7 xx0061409 $u Department of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Netuka, David $7 xx0061783 $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Patríková, Jitka $7 xx0269038 $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Janoušková, Karla $7 xx0248433 $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003824 $t Physiological research $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 70, č. 3 (2021), s. 461-468
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33982586 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220106 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220202102436 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1755678 $s 1151993
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 70 $c 3 $d 461-468 $e 20210512 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20220106