-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture
M. Jastrzębski, G. Kiełbasa, K. Curila, P. Moskal, A. Bednarek, M. Rajzer, P. Vijayaraman
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- blokáda Tawarova raménka patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- elektrokardiografie metody MeSH
- Hisův svazek fyziologie MeSH
- kardiostimulace umělá metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- převodní systém srdeční patofyziologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srdeční frekvence fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: During left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, it is important to confirm that capture of the LBB, and not just capture of only adjacent left ventricular (LV) myocardium, has been achieved. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for LBB capture. We hypothesized that because LBB pacing results in physiological depolarization of the LV, then the native QRS can serve as a reference for diagnosis of LBB capture in the same patient. METHODS: Only patients with evidence of LBB capture (QRS morphology transition) were included. Several QRS characteristics were compared between the native rhythm and different types of LBB area capture. RESULTS: A total of 357 ECGs (124 patients) were analyzed: 118 with native rhythm, 124 with nonselective LBB capture, 69 with selective LBB capture, and 46 with LV septal capture. Our hypotheses that during LBB capture the paced V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT; measured from QRS onset) equals the native V6 RWPT and that the paced V6 RWPT (measured from the stimulus) equals the LBB potential to V6 R-wave peak interval were positively validated. Criteria based on these rules had sensitivity and specificity of 88.2%-98.0% and 85.7%-95.4%, respectively. Moreover, 100% specific V6 RWPT cutoff for LBB capture diagnosis in patients with narrow QRS/right bundle branch block was determined to be 74 ms. CONCLUSION: We showed equivalency of LV activation times on ECG during native and paced LBB conduction. Therefore, if V6 RWPT is longer during pacing, this finding is indicative of lack of LBB capture.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22012420
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506130621.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.02.021 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33677102
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Jastrzębski, Marek $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland. Electronic address: mcjastrz@cyf-kr.edu.pl
- 245 10
- $a Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture / $c M. Jastrzębski, G. Kiełbasa, K. Curila, P. Moskal, A. Bednarek, M. Rajzer, P. Vijayaraman
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: During left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, it is important to confirm that capture of the LBB, and not just capture of only adjacent left ventricular (LV) myocardium, has been achieved. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for LBB capture. We hypothesized that because LBB pacing results in physiological depolarization of the LV, then the native QRS can serve as a reference for diagnosis of LBB capture in the same patient. METHODS: Only patients with evidence of LBB capture (QRS morphology transition) were included. Several QRS characteristics were compared between the native rhythm and different types of LBB area capture. RESULTS: A total of 357 ECGs (124 patients) were analyzed: 118 with native rhythm, 124 with nonselective LBB capture, 69 with selective LBB capture, and 46 with LV septal capture. Our hypotheses that during LBB capture the paced V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT; measured from QRS onset) equals the native V6 RWPT and that the paced V6 RWPT (measured from the stimulus) equals the LBB potential to V6 R-wave peak interval were positively validated. Criteria based on these rules had sensitivity and specificity of 88.2%-98.0% and 85.7%-95.4%, respectively. Moreover, 100% specific V6 RWPT cutoff for LBB capture diagnosis in patients with narrow QRS/right bundle branch block was determined to be 74 ms. CONCLUSION: We showed equivalency of LV activation times on ECG during native and paced LBB conduction. Therefore, if V6 RWPT is longer during pacing, this finding is indicative of lack of LBB capture.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a Hisův svazek $x fyziologie $7 D002036
- 650 _2
- $a blokáda Tawarova raménka $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D002037
- 650 _2
- $a kardiostimulace umělá $x metody $7 D002304
- 650 _2
- $a elektrokardiografie $x metody $7 D004562
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a převodní systém srdeční $x patofyziologie $7 D006329
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční frekvence $x fyziologie $7 D006339
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kiełbasa, Grzegorz $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Curila, Karol $u Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Moskal, Paweł $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Bednarek, Agnieszka $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Rajzer, Marek $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi $u Geisinger Heart Institute, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
- 773 0_
- $w MED00156180 $t Heart rhythm $x 1556-3871 $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2021), s. 935-943
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33677102 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506130613 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789846 $s 1163621
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 18 $c 6 $d 935-943 $e 20210304 $i 1556-3871 $m Heart rhythm $n Heart Rhythm $x MED00156180
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425