Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Czech version of the outcome rating scale: Selected psychometric properties [Česká verze Outcome Reting Scale: vybrané psychometrickécharakteristiky]

Dana Seryjová Juhová, Tomáš Řiháček, Hynek Cígler, Eva Dubovská, Martin Saic, Martin Černý, Jan Dufek, Scott D. Miller

. 2021 ; 65 (4) : 353-368.

Status minimální Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22014151

Objectives. The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) is an ultra-brief self-report scale designed to measure change during psychotherapy. The goal of this study was to test (a) the factor structure of the ORS, (b) the measurement invariance between a clinical and a non-clinical sample, between pre-therapy and post-therapy assessment (within the clinical sample), and between online and paper-and-pencil forms of administration (within the non-clinical sample), (c) concurrent validity with other outcome measures, and (d) sensitivity to therapeutic change. Sample and settings. N = 256 patients, N = 210 non-clinical respondents, and N = 89 students participated in the study. Patients responded to the ORS before and after psychotherapy. Statistical analysis. The factor structure and measurement invariance were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability were assessed using correlational analysis. Sensitivity to change was assessed using the Reliable Change Index and pre-post effect size. Results. The unidimensional structure was supported. The best-fitting model was a partially tau-equivalent model with the first and the fourth items’ loadings fixed to the same value. While only metric invariance was demonstrated between the clinical and non-clinical samples, the ORS demonstrated scalar invariance between pre- and post-therapy assessment and strict invariance between the paper-and-pencil and online forms of administration. Internal consistency, as well as concurrent validity, were satisfactory. The sensitivity to the therapeutic change was adequate. Furthermore, internal consistency and sensitivity to change were increased if the score was computed as a weighted sum of items. Study limitation. The samples were not representative.

Česká verze Outcome Reting Scale: vybrané psychometrickécharakteristiky

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22014151
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220614144810.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
220530s2021 xr ad fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.51561/cspsych.65.4.353 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng $b cze
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Juhová, Dana $7 _AN090175 $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Czech version of the outcome rating scale: Selected psychometric properties / $c Dana Seryjová Juhová, Tomáš Řiháček, Hynek Cígler, Eva Dubovská, Martin Saic, Martin Černý, Jan Dufek, Scott D. Miller
246    31
$a Česká verze Outcome Reting Scale: vybrané psychometrickécharakteristiky
504    __
$a Literatura
520    3_
$a Objectives. The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) is an ultra-brief self-report scale designed to measure change during psychotherapy. The goal of this study was to test (a) the factor structure of the ORS, (b) the measurement invariance between a clinical and a non-clinical sample, between pre-therapy and post-therapy assessment (within the clinical sample), and between online and paper-and-pencil forms of administration (within the non-clinical sample), (c) concurrent validity with other outcome measures, and (d) sensitivity to therapeutic change. Sample and settings. N = 256 patients, N = 210 non-clinical respondents, and N = 89 students participated in the study. Patients responded to the ORS before and after psychotherapy. Statistical analysis. The factor structure and measurement invariance were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability were assessed using correlational analysis. Sensitivity to change was assessed using the Reliable Change Index and pre-post effect size. Results. The unidimensional structure was supported. The best-fitting model was a partially tau-equivalent model with the first and the fourth items’ loadings fixed to the same value. While only metric invariance was demonstrated between the clinical and non-clinical samples, the ORS demonstrated scalar invariance between pre- and post-therapy assessment and strict invariance between the paper-and-pencil and online forms of administration. Internal consistency, as well as concurrent validity, were satisfactory. The sensitivity to the therapeutic change was adequate. Furthermore, internal consistency and sensitivity to change were increased if the score was computed as a weighted sum of items. Study limitation. The samples were not representative.
700    1_
$a Řiháček, Tomáš, $d 1978- $7 js20020729003 $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cígler, Hynek, $d 1986- $7 xx0066280 $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dubovská, Eva $7 jo2015863698 $u Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Saic, Martin $7 mzk2005286571 $u Daily Sanatorium Horní Palata, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Černý, Martin, $d 1975- $7 xx0076182 $u Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic; General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Psychiatry, Teaching Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dufek, Jan $7 xx0080453 $u Psychiatric Clinic, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Miller, Scott D. $u International Center for Clinical Excellence, Chicago, Illinois, USA
773    0_
$t Československá psychologie $x 0009-062X $g Roč. 65, č. 4 (2021), s. 353-368 $w MED00010994
856    41
$u https://ceskoslovenskapsychologie.cz/index.php/csps/issue/archive $y stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $c 618 $y 0 $z 0
990    __
$a 20220527095737 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220614145840 $b ABA008
999    __
$a min $b bmc $g 1798391 $s 1165370
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 65 $c 4 $d 353-368 $i 0009-062X $m Československá psychologie $x MED00010994
LZP    __
$a NLK 2022-23/dk

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace