Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Variability assessment of manual segmentations of ischemic lesion volume on 24-h non-contrast CT

P. Cimflova, JM. Ospel, M. Marko, BK. Menon, W. Qiu

. 2022 ; 64 (6) : 1165-1173. [pub] 20211123

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2002-01-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: Infarct lesion volume (ILV) may serve as an imaging biomarker for clinical outcomes in the early post-treatment stage in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of manual segmentation of ILV on follow-up non-contrast CT (NCCT) scans. METHODS: Fifty patients from the Prove-IT study were randomly selected for this analysis. Three raters manually segmented ILV on 24-h NCCT scans, slice by slice, three times. The reference standard for ILV was generated by the Simultaneous Truth And Performance Level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was evaluated, using metrics of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) regarding lesion volume and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS: Median age of the 50 subjects included was 74.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 67-80), 54% were women, median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 18 (IQR 11-22), median baseline ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 6-10). The mean reference standard ILV was 92.5 ml (standard deviation (SD) ± 100.9 ml). The manually segmented ILV ranged from 88.2 ± 91.5 to 135.5 ± 119.9 ml (means referring to the variation between readers, SD within readers). Inter-rater ICC was 0.83 (95%CI: 0.76-0.88); intra-rater ICC ranged from 0.85 (95%CI: 0.72-0.92) to 0.95 (95%CI: 0.91-0.97). The mean DSC among the three readers ranged from 65.5 ± 22.9 to 76.4 ± 17.1% and the mean overall DSC was 72.8 ± 23.0%. CONCLUSION: Manual ILV measurements on follow-up CT scans are reliable to measure the radiological outcome despite some variability.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018244
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134643.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00234-021-02855-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34812917
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Cimflova, Petra $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u Department of Medical Imaging, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/000000018058383X
245    10
$a Variability assessment of manual segmentations of ischemic lesion volume on 24-h non-contrast CT / $c P. Cimflova, JM. Ospel, M. Marko, BK. Menon, W. Qiu
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Infarct lesion volume (ILV) may serve as an imaging biomarker for clinical outcomes in the early post-treatment stage in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of manual segmentation of ILV on follow-up non-contrast CT (NCCT) scans. METHODS: Fifty patients from the Prove-IT study were randomly selected for this analysis. Three raters manually segmented ILV on 24-h NCCT scans, slice by slice, three times. The reference standard for ILV was generated by the Simultaneous Truth And Performance Level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was evaluated, using metrics of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) regarding lesion volume and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS: Median age of the 50 subjects included was 74.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 67-80), 54% were women, median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 18 (IQR 11-22), median baseline ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 6-10). The mean reference standard ILV was 92.5 ml (standard deviation (SD) ± 100.9 ml). The manually segmented ILV ranged from 88.2 ± 91.5 to 135.5 ± 119.9 ml (means referring to the variation between readers, SD within readers). Inter-rater ICC was 0.83 (95%CI: 0.76-0.88); intra-rater ICC ranged from 0.85 (95%CI: 0.72-0.92) to 0.95 (95%CI: 0.91-0.97). The mean DSC among the three readers ranged from 65.5 ± 22.9 to 76.4 ± 17.1% and the mean overall DSC was 72.8 ± 23.0%. CONCLUSION: Manual ILV measurements on follow-up CT scans are reliable to measure the radiological outcome despite some variability.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a ischemická cévní mozková příhoda $7 D000083242
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a cévní mozková příhoda $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D020521
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Ospel, Johanna M $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000300296764
700    1_
$a Marko, Martha $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000290630465
700    1_
$a Menon, Bijoy K $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/000000023466496X
700    1_
$a Qiu, Wu $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. qiu.wu.ch@gmail.com $u Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. qiu.wu.ch@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000178278270
773    0_
$w MED00003503 $t Neuroradiology $x 1432-1920 $g Roč. 64, č. 6 (2022), s. 1165-1173
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34812917 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134637 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822038 $s 1169487
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 64 $c 6 $d 1165-1173 $e 20211123 $i 1432-1920 $m Neuroradiology $n Neuroradiology $x MED00003503
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...