-
Something wrong with this record ?
Ultrasensitive circulating tumor DNA analysis enables precision medicine: experimental workflow considerations
D. Andersson, H. Kristiansson, M. Kubista, A. Ståhlberg
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- MeSH
- Circulating Tumor DNA * genetics MeSH
- Precision Medicine MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor genetics MeSH
- Workflow MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become a relevant biomarker in cancer management, allowing tumor assessment through analysis of minimally invasive liquid biopsies. Applications include screening, diagnostics, monitoring of treatment efficacy and detection of minimal residual disease as well as relapse. The potential of ctDNA analysis is significant, but several biological and technical challenges need to be addressed before widespread clinical implementation.Areas covered: Several clinical applications where ctDNA analysis may be beneficial require detection of individual DNA molecules. Consequently, to acquire accurate and informative data the entire workflow from sampling to final data interpretation needs to be optimized. In this review, we discuss the biological and technical challenges of ctDNA analysis and how preanalytical and analytical approaches affect different cancer applications.Expert opinion: While numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of using ctDNA in cancer applications, yet few reports about true clinical utility exist. Despite encouraging data, the sensitivity of ctDNA analyses, i.e. the probability to detect presence of cancer in liquid biopsies, is still an issue. Analysis of multiple mutations in combination with simultaneous assessment of other analytes is one solution. Improved standardization and guidelines will also facilitate the introduction of ctDNA analysis into clinical routine.
Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
Institute of Biotechnology Czech Academy of Sciences Vestec Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019714
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135929.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/14737159.2021.1889371 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33683971
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Andersson, Daniel $u Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $1 https://orcid.org/0000000245646652
- 245 10
- $a Ultrasensitive circulating tumor DNA analysis enables precision medicine: experimental workflow considerations / $c D. Andersson, H. Kristiansson, M. Kubista, A. Ståhlberg
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become a relevant biomarker in cancer management, allowing tumor assessment through analysis of minimally invasive liquid biopsies. Applications include screening, diagnostics, monitoring of treatment efficacy and detection of minimal residual disease as well as relapse. The potential of ctDNA analysis is significant, but several biological and technical challenges need to be addressed before widespread clinical implementation.Areas covered: Several clinical applications where ctDNA analysis may be beneficial require detection of individual DNA molecules. Consequently, to acquire accurate and informative data the entire workflow from sampling to final data interpretation needs to be optimized. In this review, we discuss the biological and technical challenges of ctDNA analysis and how preanalytical and analytical approaches affect different cancer applications.Expert opinion: While numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of using ctDNA in cancer applications, yet few reports about true clinical utility exist. Despite encouraging data, the sensitivity of ctDNA analyses, i.e. the probability to detect presence of cancer in liquid biopsies, is still an issue. Analysis of multiple mutations in combination with simultaneous assessment of other analytes is one solution. Improved standardization and guidelines will also facilitate the introduction of ctDNA analysis into clinical routine.
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x genetika $7 D014408
- 650 12
- $a cirkulující nádorová DNA $x genetika $7 D000074141
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $7 D009364
- 650 _2
- $a individualizovaná medicína $7 D057285
- 650 _2
- $a průběh práce $7 D057188
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Kristiansson, Helena $u Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Kubista, Mikael $u Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Czech Republic $u TATAA Biocenter, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Ståhlberg, Anders $u Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden $u Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden $1 https://orcid.org/0000000342430191
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174421 $t Expert review of molecular diagnostics $x 1744-8352 $g Roč. 21, č. 3 (2021), s. 299-310
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33683971 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135923 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1823073 $s 1170957
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 21 $c 3 $d 299-310 $e 20210308 $i 1744-8352 $m Expert review of molecular diagnostics $n Expert Rev Mol Diagn $x MED00174421
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720