-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of Restenosis Risk in Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Carotid Stents: A Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation
J. Sýkora, K. Zeleňák, M. Vorčák, M. Števík, M. Sýkorová, J. Sivák, M. Rovňák, J. Zapletalová, J. Mužík, I. Šinák, E. Kurča, L. Meyer, J. Fiehler
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
313011W875
European Regional Development Fund
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2003-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- duplexní dopplerovská ultrasonografie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- stenóza arteria carotis * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- stenóza MeSH
- stenty * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report intermediate-term results of duplex ultrasound follow-up of carotid artery stenting performed with the dual-layer stent as compared to concurrent patients treated with other commercially available single-layer carotid stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single centre, retrospective, nonrandomized study including 162 non-consecutive patients with 199 implanted carotid stents treated over a 7-year period was conducted. Patients with at least one ultrasound examination after treatment were included. Procedural and follow-up data for patients treated with the dual-layer stent implantation (83 stents) vs first-generation carotid stents implantations (116 stents) were compared. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 24.0 months (IQR 10-32 months) for dual-layer stents and 27.5 months (IQR 10.3-59 months) for single-layer stents. The rate of severe restenosis was significantly higher in the dual-layer stent group than in the single-layer group (13.3% [11/83] vs 3.4% [4/116], p = 0.01). Seven reinterventions were performed in 5 patients with dual-layer stents. The rate of reintervention was significantly higher compared to no reinterventions in single-layer stents (6% [5/83] vs 0% [0/116], p = 0.012). Patients with restenosis had significantly higher presence of dyslipidaemia (100% [12/12] vs 63.3% [95/150], p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting, the patients treated with low-profile dual-layer micromesh stent showed higher rates of restenosis and reinterventions compared to first-generation single-layer stents.
Clinic of Neurology University Hospital Kollárova 2 036 59 Martin Slovakia
Department of Vascular Surgery University Hospital Kollárova 2 036 59 Martin Slovakia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22024525
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100926.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00270-022-03200-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35798859
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Sýkora, Ján $u Clinic of Radiology, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Kollárova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia $u Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 185/6, 77520, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of Restenosis Risk in Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Carotid Stents: A Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation / $c J. Sýkora, K. Zeleňák, M. Vorčák, M. Števík, M. Sýkorová, J. Sivák, M. Rovňák, J. Zapletalová, J. Mužík, I. Šinák, E. Kurča, L. Meyer, J. Fiehler
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report intermediate-term results of duplex ultrasound follow-up of carotid artery stenting performed with the dual-layer stent as compared to concurrent patients treated with other commercially available single-layer carotid stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single centre, retrospective, nonrandomized study including 162 non-consecutive patients with 199 implanted carotid stents treated over a 7-year period was conducted. Patients with at least one ultrasound examination after treatment were included. Procedural and follow-up data for patients treated with the dual-layer stent implantation (83 stents) vs first-generation carotid stents implantations (116 stents) were compared. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 24.0 months (IQR 10-32 months) for dual-layer stents and 27.5 months (IQR 10.3-59 months) for single-layer stents. The rate of severe restenosis was significantly higher in the dual-layer stent group than in the single-layer group (13.3% [11/83] vs 3.4% [4/116], p = 0.01). Seven reinterventions were performed in 5 patients with dual-layer stents. The rate of reintervention was significantly higher compared to no reinterventions in single-layer stents (6% [5/83] vs 0% [0/116], p = 0.012). Patients with restenosis had significantly higher presence of dyslipidaemia (100% [12/12] vs 63.3% [95/150], p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting, the patients treated with low-profile dual-layer micromesh stent showed higher rates of restenosis and reinterventions compared to first-generation single-layer stents.
- 650 12
- $a stenóza arteria carotis $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D016893
- 650 _2
- $a stenóza $7 D003251
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a stenty $x škodlivé účinky $7 D015607
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a duplexní dopplerovská ultrasonografie $7 D018616
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zeleňák, Kamil $u Clinic of Radiology, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Kollárova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia. kamil.zelenak@uniba.sk $1 https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000000204162985
- 700 1_
- $a Vorčák, Martin $u Clinic of Radiology, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Kollárova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Števík, Martin $u Clinic of Radiology, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Kollárova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Sýkorová, Martina $u Vaša Ambulancia, s. r. o., Prieložtek 1, 036 01, Martin, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Sivák, Jozef $u Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 185/6, 77520, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Middle-Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cesta k nemocnici 1, 974 01, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Rovňák, Marek $u Orthopedic Clinic, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Kollárova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletalová, Jana $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 976/3, 775 15, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mužík, Juraj $u Department of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná, 8215/1, 010 26, Žilina, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Šinák, Igor $u Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Kollárova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Kurča, Egon $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital, Kollárova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Meyer, Lukas $u Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Fiehler, Jens $u Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001056 $t Cardiovascular and interventional radiology $x 1432-086X $g Roč. 45, č. 9 (2022), s. 1257-1266
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35798859 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100923 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854317 $s 1175815
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 45 $c 9 $d 1257-1266 $e 20220707 $i 1432-086X $m Cardiovascular and interventional radiology $n Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol $x MED00001056
- GRA __
- $a 313011W875 $p European Regional Development Fund
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017