-
Something wrong with this record ?
Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for the Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
P. Ticha, M. Wu, M. Bujda, A. Sukop
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2002-11-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2003-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2002-11-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Esthetics MeSH
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Quality of Life MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mammaplasty * methods MeSH
- Mastectomy methods MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms * surgery MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Patient Satisfaction MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become an integral part of the evaluation of reconstruction surgery outcomes. However, there are limitations in current PROMs when it comes to the assessment of well-being during inpatient stay, patient perception of health, relationship with partner, and vitality (i.e., mood and ability to work and pursue hobbies, carry out daily tasks, and sleep) following breast reconstructive surgery. The aim was to develop a novel set of measures to compare patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following different types of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. METHODS: A novel questionnaire was created and refined through cognitive interviews with patients and expert feedback. A field test study was conducted, including patients who had undergone delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction with implant, autologous tissue, or combination of implant and autologous tissue. Based on the results, confirmatory factor analysis and examination of reliability of the questionnaire were conducted. Results of patient responses were analyzed using Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit, and Cronbach's alpha indicated high internal consistency of the questionnaire. Besides that, patients with combination reconstruction reported significantly lower vitality than patients with implant and autologous reconstruction (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This novel questionnaire expands the current knowledge base of postmastectomy breast reconstruction PROMs. Results of the field test study showed that combination reconstruction was associated with lower patient vitality than other reconstruction types. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22024946
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230222110455.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00266-022-02985-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35879476
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Tichá, Pavla $u Department of Plastic Surgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University in Prague, Srobarova 50, 10034, Prague 10, Czech Republic $u Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1651 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA $7 xx0282380
- 245 10
- $a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for the Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction / $c P. Ticha, M. Wu, M. Bujda, A. Sukop
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become an integral part of the evaluation of reconstruction surgery outcomes. However, there are limitations in current PROMs when it comes to the assessment of well-being during inpatient stay, patient perception of health, relationship with partner, and vitality (i.e., mood and ability to work and pursue hobbies, carry out daily tasks, and sleep) following breast reconstructive surgery. The aim was to develop a novel set of measures to compare patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following different types of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. METHODS: A novel questionnaire was created and refined through cognitive interviews with patients and expert feedback. A field test study was conducted, including patients who had undergone delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction with implant, autologous tissue, or combination of implant and autologous tissue. Based on the results, confirmatory factor analysis and examination of reliability of the questionnaire were conducted. Results of patient responses were analyzed using Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit, and Cronbach's alpha indicated high internal consistency of the questionnaire. Besides that, patients with combination reconstruction reported significantly lower vitality than patients with implant and autologous reconstruction (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This novel questionnaire expands the current knowledge base of postmastectomy breast reconstruction PROMs. Results of the field test study showed that combination reconstruction was associated with lower patient vitality than other reconstruction types. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
- 650 12
- $a nádory prsu $x chirurgie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a estetika $7 D004954
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a mamoplastika $x metody $7 D016462
- 650 _2
- $a mastektomie $x metody $7 D008408
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
- 650 _2
- $a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Wu, Meagan $u Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1651 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Bujda, Michele $u Department of Plastic Surgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University in Prague, Srobarova 50, 10034, Prague 10, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sukop, Andrej $u Department of Plastic Surgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University in Prague, Srobarova 50, 10034, Prague 10, Czech Republic. andrej@sukop.cz $1 https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000000159245123
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005691 $t Aesthetic plastic surgery $x 1432-5241 $g Roč. 46, č. 4 (2022), s. 1588-1599
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35879476 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230222110450 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854573 $s 1176236
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 46 $c 4 $d 1588-1599 $e 20220725 $i 1432-5241 $m Aesthetic plastic surgery $n Aesthetic Plast Surg $x MED00005691
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017