-
Something wrong with this record ?
The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation-defined tumors
E. Mosaieby, P. Martínek, O. Ondič
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2013
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
ProQuest Central
from 2013-05-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
from 2013
PubMed
35621010
DOI
10.1002/mgg3.1994
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Gene Fusion MeSH
- Genomics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mutation MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor genetics MeSH
- Neoplasms * genetics pathology MeSH
- Translocation, Genetic MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: This study presents a novel molecular parameter potentially co-defining tumor biology-the total tumor suppressor gene (TSG) count at chromosomal loci harboring genes rearranged in fusion-defined tumors. It belongs to the family of molecular parameters created using a black-box approach. METHOD: It is based on a public curated Texas TSG database. Its data are regrouped based on individual genes loci using another public database (Genecards). The total TSG count for NTRK (NTRK1; OMIM: 191315; NTRK2; OMIM: 600456; NTRK3; OMIM: 191316), NRG1 (OMIM: 142445), and RET (OMIM: 164761) rearranged tumors in patients treated with a theranostic approach is calculated using the results of recently published studies. RESULTS: Altogether 138 loci containing at least three TSGs are identified. These include 21 "extremely hot" spots, with 10 to 28 TSGs mapping to a given locus. However, the study falls short of finding a correlation between tumor regression or patient survival and the TSG count owing to a low number of cases meeting the study criteria. CONCLUSION: The total TSG count alone cannot predict the biology of translocation-defined tumors. The addition of other parameters, including microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutation burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and copy number heterogeneity (CNH), might be helpful. Thus a multi-modal data integration is advocated. We believe that large scale studies should evaluate the significance and value of the total TSG count.
Department of Pathology Medical Faculty in Pilsen Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Molecular Genetics Department Bioptická Laboratoř s r o Pilsen Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025087
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031101256.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/mgg3.1994 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35621010
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Mosaieby, Elaheh $u Molecular Genetics Department, Bioptická Laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation-defined tumors / $c E. Mosaieby, P. Martínek, O. Ondič
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: This study presents a novel molecular parameter potentially co-defining tumor biology-the total tumor suppressor gene (TSG) count at chromosomal loci harboring genes rearranged in fusion-defined tumors. It belongs to the family of molecular parameters created using a black-box approach. METHOD: It is based on a public curated Texas TSG database. Its data are regrouped based on individual genes loci using another public database (Genecards). The total TSG count for NTRK (NTRK1; OMIM: 191315; NTRK2; OMIM: 600456; NTRK3; OMIM: 191316), NRG1 (OMIM: 142445), and RET (OMIM: 164761) rearranged tumors in patients treated with a theranostic approach is calculated using the results of recently published studies. RESULTS: Altogether 138 loci containing at least three TSGs are identified. These include 21 "extremely hot" spots, with 10 to 28 TSGs mapping to a given locus. However, the study falls short of finding a correlation between tumor regression or patient survival and the TSG count owing to a low number of cases meeting the study criteria. CONCLUSION: The total TSG count alone cannot predict the biology of translocation-defined tumors. The addition of other parameters, including microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutation burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and copy number heterogeneity (CNH), might be helpful. Thus a multi-modal data integration is advocated. We believe that large scale studies should evaluate the significance and value of the total TSG count.
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x genetika $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a fúze genů $7 D050939
- 650 _2
- $a genomika $7 D023281
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mutace $7 D009154
- 650 12
- $a nádory $x genetika $x patologie $7 D009369
- 650 _2
- $a translokace genetická $7 D014178
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Martínek, Petr $u Molecular Genetics Department, Bioptická Laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ondič, Ondrej $u Molecular Genetics Department, Bioptická Laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000240385641
- 773 0_
- $w MED00205675 $t Molecular genetics & genomic medicine $x 2324-9269 $g Roč. 10, č. 8 (2022), s. e1994
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35621010 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031101254 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854677 $s 1176377
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 10 $c 8 $d e1994 $e 20220527 $i 2324-9269 $m Molecular genetics & genomic medicine $n Mol Genet Genomic Med $x MED00205675
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017