-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Biomechanics optimisation of the laminoplasty groove size and position: A numerical study
A. Hrouda, L. Capek, J. Hradil, Z. Horak
Jazyk angličtina
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- krční obratle diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- laminoplastika * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: This study is focused on the opening technique of the cervical vertebrae during laminoplasty which serves to substantially reduce the most severe adverse effects of the simple resection of posterior vertebral elements. This computational study aims to clarify by an optimisation approach what shape and position upon the lamina the groove should have. METHODS: The computational model was developed in the computational software COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6a based on a computer tomography data obtained from the C4 vertebra. For finding the optimal minimum or maximum of a function (surface), optimisation algorithms are developed following the Nelder-Mead algorithm. RESULTS: The reaction-opening force increases with a decreasing groove radius and an increasing position from the vertebra body. The created area increases with a decreasing groove radius and a decreasing position. As the opening happens mostly only above the groove, the opening area increases only in this location. Moreover, the von Mises stress peak value is almost twice as large as in the case of maximization of the opening area, which might result in breaking of the lamina as the thickness of the lamina would be reduced to its minimum. CONCLUSION: The groove radius and position can affect the opening force and the opening area in case of double door laminoplasty. The opening force is highly influenced by the groove position and radius. The best position for placing the groove is in the middle of the lamina and the radius of the groove should be as large as possible.
Colleague of Polytechnics Jihlava Tolsteho 1556 58601 Jihlava Czech Republic
KU Leuven Department of Mechanical Engineering Belgium
Regional Hospital in Liberec Husova 10 46001 Liberec Czech Republic
Technical University of Liberec Studentska 2 46117 Liberec Czech Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22032851
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131151138.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 Sco f 000 0|00 0|
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.08.026 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36084565
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a Scotland
- 100 1_
- $a Hrouda, Ales $u KU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Belgium; Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 2, 46117 Liberec, Czech, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Biomechanics optimisation of the laminoplasty groove size and position: A numerical study / $c A. Hrouda, L. Capek, J. Hradil, Z. Horak
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: This study is focused on the opening technique of the cervical vertebrae during laminoplasty which serves to substantially reduce the most severe adverse effects of the simple resection of posterior vertebral elements. This computational study aims to clarify by an optimisation approach what shape and position upon the lamina the groove should have. METHODS: The computational model was developed in the computational software COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6a based on a computer tomography data obtained from the C4 vertebra. For finding the optimal minimum or maximum of a function (surface), optimisation algorithms are developed following the Nelder-Mead algorithm. RESULTS: The reaction-opening force increases with a decreasing groove radius and an increasing position from the vertebra body. The created area increases with a decreasing groove radius and a decreasing position. As the opening happens mostly only above the groove, the opening area increases only in this location. Moreover, the von Mises stress peak value is almost twice as large as in the case of maximization of the opening area, which might result in breaking of the lamina as the thickness of the lamina would be reduced to its minimum. CONCLUSION: The groove radius and position can affect the opening force and the opening area in case of double door laminoplasty. The opening force is highly influenced by the groove position and radius. The best position for placing the groove is in the middle of the lamina and the radius of the groove should be as large as possible.
- 650 _2
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a krční obratle $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D002574
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a laminoplastika $x škodlivé účinky $7 D065406
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Capek, Lukas $u Regional Hospital in Liberec, Husova 10, 46001 Liberec, Czech Republic; Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 2, 46117 Liberec, Czech, Czech Republic. Electronic address: lukas.capek@nemlib.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Hradil, Jan $u Regional Hospital in Liberec, Husova 10, 46001 Liberec, Czech Republic; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10 Vinohrady, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Horak, Zdenek $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10 Vinohrady, Czech Republic; Colleague of Polytechnics Jihlava, Tolsteho 1556, 58601 Jihlava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166944 $t Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia $x 1532-2653 $g Roč. 105, č. - (2022), s. 45-50
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36084565 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131151134 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891535 $s 1184186
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 105 $c - $d 45-50 $e 20220906 $i 1532-2653 $m Journal of clinical neuroscience $n J. clin. neurosci. $x MED00166944
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120