• Something wrong with this record ?

Pesticide residue exposure provides different responses of the microbiomes of distinct cultures of the stored product pest mite Acarus siro

J. Hubert, B. Navratilova, B. Sopko, M. Nesvorna, TW. Phillips

. 2022 ; 22 (1) : 252. [pub] 20221019

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: The contribution of the microbiome to pesticide breakdown in agricultural pests remains unclear. We analyzed the effect of pirimiphos-methyl (PM) on four geographically different cultures of the stored product pest mite Acarus siro (6 L, 6Tu, 6Tk and 6Z) under laboratory experiments. The effect of PM on mite mortality in the impregnated filter paper test was compared. RESULTS: The mite sensitivity to PM decreased in the order of 6 L, 6Tu, 6Tk, and 6Z. Then, the mites were cultured on PM residues (0.0125 and 1.25 μg·g-1), and population growth was compared to the control after 21 days of exposure. The comparison showed two situations: (i) increasing population growth for the most sensitive cultures (6 L and 6Tu), and (ii) no effect on mite population growth for tolerant cultures (6Z and 6Tk). The microbiome of mites was analyzed by quantification of 16S DNA copies based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and by barcode sequencing of the V4 fragment of 16S DNA on samples of 30 individuals from the control and PM residues. The microbiome comprised primarily Solitalea-like organisms in all cultures, except for 6Z, followed by Bacillus, Staphylococcus, and Lactobacillus. The microbiomes of mite cultures did not change with increasing population density. The microbiome of cultures without any differences in population density showed differences in the microbiome composition. A Sodalis-like symbiont replaced Solitalea in the 1.25 μg·g-1 PM in the 6Tk culture. Sodalis and Bacillus prevailed in the microbiomes of PM-treated mites of 6Z culture, while Solitalea was almost absent. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the microbiome of A. siro differs in composition and in response to PM residues in the diet. The results indicate that Sodalis-like symbionts can help recover mites from pesticide-induced stress.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22033026
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230228133947.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12866-022-02661-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36261789
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hubert, Jan, $u Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507/73, 16106, Prague 6 - Ruzyne, Czechia. carpoglyphus@gmail.com $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 00, Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czechia. carpoglyphus@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/000000030740166X $d 1972- $7 mzk2005306688
245    10
$a Pesticide residue exposure provides different responses of the microbiomes of distinct cultures of the stored product pest mite Acarus siro / $c J. Hubert, B. Navratilova, B. Sopko, M. Nesvorna, TW. Phillips
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The contribution of the microbiome to pesticide breakdown in agricultural pests remains unclear. We analyzed the effect of pirimiphos-methyl (PM) on four geographically different cultures of the stored product pest mite Acarus siro (6 L, 6Tu, 6Tk and 6Z) under laboratory experiments. The effect of PM on mite mortality in the impregnated filter paper test was compared. RESULTS: The mite sensitivity to PM decreased in the order of 6 L, 6Tu, 6Tk, and 6Z. Then, the mites were cultured on PM residues (0.0125 and 1.25 μg·g-1), and population growth was compared to the control after 21 days of exposure. The comparison showed two situations: (i) increasing population growth for the most sensitive cultures (6 L and 6Tu), and (ii) no effect on mite population growth for tolerant cultures (6Z and 6Tk). The microbiome of mites was analyzed by quantification of 16S DNA copies based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and by barcode sequencing of the V4 fragment of 16S DNA on samples of 30 individuals from the control and PM residues. The microbiome comprised primarily Solitalea-like organisms in all cultures, except for 6Z, followed by Bacillus, Staphylococcus, and Lactobacillus. The microbiomes of mite cultures did not change with increasing population density. The microbiome of cultures without any differences in population density showed differences in the microbiome composition. A Sodalis-like symbiont replaced Solitalea in the 1.25 μg·g-1 PM in the 6Tk culture. Sodalis and Bacillus prevailed in the microbiomes of PM-treated mites of 6Z culture, while Solitalea was almost absent. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the microbiome of A. siro differs in composition and in response to PM residues in the diet. The results indicate that Sodalis-like symbionts can help recover mites from pesticide-induced stress.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a Acaridae $7 D040041
650    12
$a rezidua pesticidů $7 D010573
650    12
$a roztoči $7 D008925
650    12
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a Bacteroidetes $7 D041963
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Navratilova, Blanka $u Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507/73, 16106, Prague 6 - Ruzyne, Czechia $u Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 1594/7, CZ-128 44, Prague 2 - New Town, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000204365600
700    1_
$a Sopko, Bruno $u Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507/73, 16106, Prague 6 - Ruzyne, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000255801871 $7 xx0250670
700    1_
$a Nesvorná, Marta $u Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507/73, 16106, Prague 6 - Ruzyne, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000305724131 $7 mzk2016907308
700    1_
$a Phillips, Thomas W $u Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000251966994
773    0_
$w MED00008191 $t BMC microbiology $x 1471-2180 $g Roč. 22, č. 1 (2022), s. 252
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36261789 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230228133944 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891660 $s 1184361
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 22 $c 1 $d 252 $e 20221019 $i 1471-2180 $m BMC microbiology $n BMC Microbiol $x MED00008191
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...