Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients

D. Grieco, E. Bressi, K. Sedláček, K. Čurila, K. Vernooy, E. Fedele, E. De Ruvo, A. Fagagnini, J. Kron, SK. Padala, KA. Ellenbogen, L. Calò

. 2023 ; 66 (2) : 311-321. [pub] 20220310

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-07-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-07-01 to 1 year ago

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging technique to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but its feasibility and safety in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block is hardly investigated. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with an indication for CRT comparing pacing parameters and complication rates of LBBAP-CRT in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) versus younger patients (< 75 years) over a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 55/60 enrolled patients (92%), among which 25(45%) were elderly. In both groups, LBBAP significantly reduced the QRS duration (elderly group: 168 ± 15 ms to 136 ± 12 ms, p < 0.0001; younger group: 166 ± 14 ms to 134 ± 11 ms, p < 0.0001) and improved LVEF (elderly group: 28 ± 5% to 40 ± 7%, p < 0.0001; younger group: 29 ± 5% to 41 ± 8%, p < 0.0001). The pacing threshold was 0.9 ± 0.8 V in the elderly group vs. 0.7 ± 0.5 V in the younger group (p = 0.350). The R wave was 9.5 ± 3.9 mV in elderly patients vs. 10.7 ± 2.7 mV in younger patients (p = 0.341). The fluoroscopic (elderly: 13 ± 7 min vs. younger: 11 ± 7 min, p = 0.153) and procedural time (elderly: 80 ± 20 min vs. younger: 78 ± 16 min, p = 0.749) were comparable between groups. Lead dislodgement occurred in 2(4%) patients, 1 in each group (p = 1.000). Intraprocedural septal perforation occurred in three patients (5%), 2(8%) in the elderly group (p = 0.585). One patient (2%) in the elderly group had a pocket infection. CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP is a feasible and safe technique for delivering physiological pacing in elderly patients who are candidates for CRT with suitable pacing parameters and low complication rates.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004071
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425141059.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10840-022-01174-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35266067
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Grieco, Domenico $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Via Casilina, 1049, 00169, Rome, Italy
245    10
$a Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients / $c D. Grieco, E. Bressi, K. Sedláček, K. Čurila, K. Vernooy, E. Fedele, E. De Ruvo, A. Fagagnini, J. Kron, SK. Padala, KA. Ellenbogen, L. Calò
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging technique to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but its feasibility and safety in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block is hardly investigated. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with an indication for CRT comparing pacing parameters and complication rates of LBBAP-CRT in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) versus younger patients (< 75 years) over a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 55/60 enrolled patients (92%), among which 25(45%) were elderly. In both groups, LBBAP significantly reduced the QRS duration (elderly group: 168 ± 15 ms to 136 ± 12 ms, p < 0.0001; younger group: 166 ± 14 ms to 134 ± 11 ms, p < 0.0001) and improved LVEF (elderly group: 28 ± 5% to 40 ± 7%, p < 0.0001; younger group: 29 ± 5% to 41 ± 8%, p < 0.0001). The pacing threshold was 0.9 ± 0.8 V in the elderly group vs. 0.7 ± 0.5 V in the younger group (p = 0.350). The R wave was 9.5 ± 3.9 mV in elderly patients vs. 10.7 ± 2.7 mV in younger patients (p = 0.341). The fluoroscopic (elderly: 13 ± 7 min vs. younger: 11 ± 7 min, p = 0.153) and procedural time (elderly: 80 ± 20 min vs. younger: 78 ± 16 min, p = 0.749) were comparable between groups. Lead dislodgement occurred in 2(4%) patients, 1 in each group (p = 1.000). Intraprocedural septal perforation occurred in three patients (5%), 2(8%) in the elderly group (p = 0.585). One patient (2%) in the elderly group had a pocket infection. CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP is a feasible and safe technique for delivering physiological pacing in elderly patients who are candidates for CRT with suitable pacing parameters and low complication rates.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a srdeční resynchronizační terapie $x metody $7 D058406
650    _2
$a Hisův svazek $7 D002036
650    _2
$a kardiostimulace umělá $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D002304
650    _2
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $x metody $7 D004562
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a tepový objem $7 D013318
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bressi, Edoardo $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Via Casilina, 1049, 00169, Rome, Italy. edo.bressi@gmail.com $u Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. edo.bressi@gmail.com $u Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. edo.bressi@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000280806842
700    1_
$a Sedláček, Kamil $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine - Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Čurila, Karol $u Department of Cardiology, Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vernooy, Kevin $u Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Fedele, Elisa $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Via Casilina, 1049, 00169, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a De Ruvo, Ermenegildo $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Via Casilina, 1049, 00169, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Fagagnini, Alessandro $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Via Casilina, 1049, 00169, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Kron, Jordana $u Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
700    1_
$a Padala, Santosh K $u Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
700    1_
$a Ellenbogen, Kenneth A $u Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
700    1_
$a Calò, Leonardo $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Via Casilina, 1049, 00169, Rome, Italy
773    0_
$w MED00008134 $t Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing $x 1572-8595 $g Roč. 66, č. 2 (2023), s. 311-321
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35266067 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425141056 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1924628 $s 1190280
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 66 $c 2 $d 311-321 $e 20220310 $i 1572-8595 $m Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology $n J Interv Card Electrophysiol $x MED00008134
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...