-
Something wrong with this record ?
Access to novel cancer medicines in four countries in Central and Eastern Europe in relation to clinical benefit
T. Hofmarcher, P. Szilagyiova, A. Gustafsson, T. Dolezal, P. Rutkowski, C. Baxter, E. Karamousouli
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2016
PubMed Central
from 2016
Europe PubMed Central
from 2016
Open Access Digital Library
from 2016-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2016
- MeSH
- Medical Oncology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasms * drug therapy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Poland MeSH
BACKGROUND: Almost 100 novel cancer medicines have been approved in Europe over the last decade. Limited public health care resources in countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) call for a prioritization of access to effective medicines. We investigated how both reimbursement status and waiting time to reimbursement correlate with the magnitude of clinical benefit provided by novel medicines in four selected countries (Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 124 indications of 51 cancer medicines with marketing authorization by the European Medicines Agency in 2011-2020 were included and followed up until 2022. Data on reimbursement status and waiting time to reimbursement (i.e. time from marketing authorization to national reimbursement approval) were collected for each country. Data were analyzed in relation to clinical benefit status (i.e. substantial versus nonsubstantial clinical benefit) of indications according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). RESULTS: The degree of reimbursement differed between countries with 64% of indications with reimbursement in Czechia, 40% in Hungary, 51% in Poland, and 19% in Slovakia. In all countries, a significantly greater proportion of indications with a substantial clinical benefit was reimbursed (P < 0.05). The median waiting time to reimbursement ranged from 27 months in Poland to 37 months in Hungary. No significant differences in waiting time in relation to clinical benefit were observed in any country (P = 0.25-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer medicines with a substantial clinical benefit are more likely to be reimbursed in all four CEE countries. Waiting times to reimbursement are equally long for medicines with or without a substantial clinical benefit, indicating a lack of prioritization of fast access to medicines delivering a substantial benefit. Incorporation of the ESMO-MCBS in reimbursement assessments and decisions could aid in better utilization of limited resources to deliver more effective cancer care.
IHE The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Lund Sweden
Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Warsaw Poland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016671
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026105633.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101593 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37413761
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Hofmarcher, T $u IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: thomas.hofmarcher@ihe.se
- 245 10
- $a Access to novel cancer medicines in four countries in Central and Eastern Europe in relation to clinical benefit / $c T. Hofmarcher, P. Szilagyiova, A. Gustafsson, T. Dolezal, P. Rutkowski, C. Baxter, E. Karamousouli
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Almost 100 novel cancer medicines have been approved in Europe over the last decade. Limited public health care resources in countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) call for a prioritization of access to effective medicines. We investigated how both reimbursement status and waiting time to reimbursement correlate with the magnitude of clinical benefit provided by novel medicines in four selected countries (Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 124 indications of 51 cancer medicines with marketing authorization by the European Medicines Agency in 2011-2020 were included and followed up until 2022. Data on reimbursement status and waiting time to reimbursement (i.e. time from marketing authorization to national reimbursement approval) were collected for each country. Data were analyzed in relation to clinical benefit status (i.e. substantial versus nonsubstantial clinical benefit) of indications according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). RESULTS: The degree of reimbursement differed between countries with 64% of indications with reimbursement in Czechia, 40% in Hungary, 51% in Poland, and 19% in Slovakia. In all countries, a significantly greater proportion of indications with a substantial clinical benefit was reimbursed (P < 0.05). The median waiting time to reimbursement ranged from 27 months in Poland to 37 months in Hungary. No significant differences in waiting time in relation to clinical benefit were observed in any country (P = 0.25-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer medicines with a substantial clinical benefit are more likely to be reimbursed in all four CEE countries. Waiting times to reimbursement are equally long for medicines with or without a substantial clinical benefit, indicating a lack of prioritization of fast access to medicines delivering a substantial benefit. Incorporation of the ESMO-MCBS in reimbursement assessments and decisions could aid in better utilization of limited resources to deliver more effective cancer care.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a nádory $x farmakoterapie $7 D009369
- 650 _2
- $a lékařská onkologie $7 D008495
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 651 _2
- $a Polsko $7 D011044
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Szilagyiova, P $u MSD, s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Gustafsson, A $u IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Dolezal, T $u Value Outcomes s.r.o., Praha 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rutkowski, P $u Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Baxter, C $u MSD (UK) Limited, London, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Karamousouli, E $u MSD Greece, Alimos, Greece
- 773 0_
- $w MED00196632 $t ESMO open $x 2059-7029 $g Roč. 8, č. 4 (2023), s. 101593
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37413761 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026105627 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000283 $s 1203033
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 8 $c 4 $d 101593 $e 20230704 $i 2059-7029 $m ESMO open $n ESMO Open $x MED00196632
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013